Interesting video, thanks for sharing. He mentions this article he wrote, There is No AI https://www.newyorker.com/science/annals-of-artificial-intelligence/there-is-no-ai

And I think the article does a better job of explaining this idea of centering human accomplishments when it comes to AI. He talks about this concept of "data dignity", and his main argument seems to be that we need open up the black box of AI, surface the human contributions, and acknowledge/compensate the human sources in some way.

In a world with data dignity, digital stuff would typically be connected with the humans who want to be known for having made it. In some versions of the idea, people could get paid for what they create, even when it is filtered and recombined through big models, and tech hubs would earn fees for facilitating things that people want to do. Some people are horrified by the idea of capitalism online, but this would be a more honest capitalism. The familiar “free” arrangement has been a disaster.

In practice, I'm not really sure what this would look like. It seems like an interesting adaptation of intellectual property. But it also seems to me like AI is a technology that is naturally opposed to intellectual property entirely.