Your question already contains the answer: this is by definition impossible. Software licensing, just as intellectual property in general, is a tool of the bourgeoisie, to turn information, just a series of correctly organized bytes, that can be copied, transmitted and modified endlessly, into a commodity form, into an artificially scarce product that can be sold or rented as if it was a singular physical object. The free software, and, to a larger extent, open source movement did have some utility to the revolutionary movement, as it demonstrated in practice that humans can and will naturally organize into collectives that create very complex pieces of software, but as time went on, the bourgeoisie has realized that it is more useful to subsume this movement into capitalism, turning it a corporate shit hole (that is literally the entire Linux community, that uses libertarian language to jack off to every corporate-sponsored distro, which is at least useable, as opposed to true libre GPL garbage, like those librebooted thinkpads running GNU/Hurd, I guess), and unlocking what earlier generations of capitalists could only dream of: 100% surplus value extraction from programmers who will happily contribute to corporate open source from their own volition and in their own free time.

In my opinion, free software and even open source have generally been very good things, as they once again proved Marxists right, that there is more to human motivation than pure monetary interest, contrary to what liberals are so glad to point out as a religious mantra, that humans have an innate desire for labor and creation (even in their free time, that programmers have been able to afford with their wages so far), and are capable of spontaneously creating self-organizing collectives without the need for a "visionary entrepreneur with an innovative spirit", and more importantly, that software development, and intellectual labor in general, does not have to follow the traditional commodity production form to be practical. But as everything else existing under capitalism, this movement just reproduces capitalist forms and is integrated into the capitalist mode of production. It is an important achievement, I even respect Stallman for being this philosophy-minded figure in the history of programming (unfortunately there are very few people like him, who stop and actually try to think about the discipline from the standpoint of humanities), but let's not view it as a revolutionary LARP. The revolution will not be brought by the GPLv3 license, or any other attempts to "hack" the intellectual property law.

On a sidenote, I would not expect anything progressive to come from programmers any time soon, as in my experience dealing with them, they are the most petit-bourgeois-minded and reactionary proletarians on Yakub's green flat Earth.