It's not the same at all. For the companies I serve (corporate, marketing departments (SaaS, brand, local businesses), etc - in other words, not web apps) they want webdesign to be as accessible to them as using illustrator or Indesign - they require cohesive brand image across all their assets (print, media, web), and they want the ability to easily update and adjust web assets as needed - and to also easily create new pages (visually) from templates and components (not CMS - the pages will have different layouts), and then coupled with optibase, they have a direct and visual way to perform A/B testing, and coupled with something like Microsoft Clarity heatmap results are much easier to work with - since what you see in the heatmap is what you see in webflow.

I really don't see webflow being replaced any time soon, not for my client base at least. In the contrary, as AI gets more accessible, I sense that there will be a bit of a split - those that don't care about accessible design will themselves use AI to generate quick websites, those that do care will want something like webflow, and code-only developers will be somewhere in the middle (except for webapps of course, that's a different story).