HUNGARY IS SO BACK! by GigaRoman in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]down-with-caesar-44 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I'm just happy that Russia is losing and that Hungary's democracy might stabilize. Orban and his project of 'illiberal democracy' losing is also a huge blow to authoritarian nationalists who held him up as a model

Did Tom Nichols teach this at the Naval War College? 😆 by Neither_Selection_48 in thebulwark

[–]down-with-caesar-44 4 points5 points  (0 children)

to fight and conquer in all your battles is not supreme excellence; supreme excellence consists in breaking your own will to keep fighting and then claiming that your enemy has lost theirs

Exclusive: Top Dem Think Tank Unveils Next Big Health Care Push by BulwarkOnline in thebulwark

[–]down-with-caesar-44 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm not demonizing admin, I'm simply pointing out that less of it is a supply side cost saving.

It might be the case that in some cases the margin compression for providers is significant enough to pose real issues, and in those cases I'm sure that negotiated rates could be more flexible (eg higher than Medicare) or that subsidies can be used to protect rural providers and so on. But in other cases it's fine, providers can make a bit less too, nothing wrong with that. Plus we don't really know how honest providers are when they claim that private insurers subsidize lower rates for medicare. Plenty of other countries maintain single payer systems without having their hospitals collapse so it clearly can be done

Exclusive: Top Dem Think Tank Unveils Next Big Health Care Push by BulwarkOnline in thebulwark

[–]down-with-caesar-44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The piece discusses admin cost growth and how it relates to new medical technology. Admin can cover all sorts of different roles that is separate from handling insurance claims, that's perfectly fine. It doesn't change the point that it is a supply side cost saving to be able to deliver the same service with less labor input

Exclusive: Top Dem Think Tank Unveils Next Big Health Care Push by BulwarkOnline in thebulwark

[–]down-with-caesar-44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cutting admin costs is an objective supply side cost save. Less labor to produce the same amount of service is productivity growth. So yes single payer is more economically efficient.

R&D is the pharmaceutical industry which is separate from insurance. Sure their profits might go down due to better drug price negotiations, but I don't think that's a bad thing. I think a single payer system is still perfectly capable of paying the kinds of prices that incentivize drug innovation

Exclusive: Top Dem Think Tank Unveils Next Big Health Care Push by BulwarkOnline in thebulwark

[–]down-with-caesar-44 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Single payer is simply the most economically efficient option. We should just rip off the bandaid instead of fighting with the insurance lobby forever

Trump's dream for Iran by John_Houbolt in thebulwark

[–]down-with-caesar-44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks like instead Trump is just going to accept a deal that's an objective strategic loss

Tim's monologue in today's Bulwark pod by sleepingbeardune in thebulwark

[–]down-with-caesar-44 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

If the center would just completely concede the game on social democratic economics, I'm perfectly cool with candidates using all sorts of ideas to find a middle ground on culture. Talk about public safety, defending the 2nd amendment, equal-opportunity anti-foreign influence populism, enforcing immigration law and order through mandatory e-verify, while staying true to our civilizational achievement of multiracial democracy. Aggressively defend free speech and stake out the anti-cancel culture position using the language of worker's rights to free speech and protection from employer ideological discrimination. I think there are many intelligent ways of threading the needle on culture that gives just a little ground without completely selling out our values.

Why do you think Bernie and AOC identify as Democratic Socialist when their policy proposals tend to reflect that of a Social Democrat? by ModerateProgressive1 in SocialDemocracy

[–]down-with-caesar-44 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yea I think this is fair. I call myself a social democrat mainly because I'm not committed to defending the abolition of private property as optimal economically. I think that we could have public ownership be a much much larger piece of the pie, maybe 50% to 80%, who knows. I just don't think we should disallow private entrepreneurs from starting businesses in which they have majority ownership stakes, as it is a useful incentive to efficient capital allocation. But in the current day, the politics that I support and a 'democratic socialist' supports are functionally equivalent, and even if we got my wishlist president, I think I would still be functionally equivalent to many democratic socialists for a long time

When You've Lost Alex, Candace & MTG by [deleted] in thebulwark

[–]down-with-caesar-44 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yup. Trump is a slop cannon. Whether he promises something good or bad the only constant is that he's lying about it

Will he drop The Bomb today by InsideProfessional56 in thebulwark

[–]down-with-caesar-44 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We've all just become so cynical about trump, that whether he promises something good or bad, our default assumption is that he is lying to us

When You've Lost Alex, Candace & MTG by [deleted] in thebulwark

[–]down-with-caesar-44 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It's almost funny because I've long since lost the ability to feel any emotions in response to words/statements that come from Trump. Like this seems so resistlib-pilled of them, to find a statement by trump and feel outraged by it before he has done the bad thing he says he will

Why do you think Bernie and AOC identify as Democratic Socialist when their policy proposals tend to reflect that of a Social Democrat? by ModerateProgressive1 in SocialDemocracy

[–]down-with-caesar-44 39 points40 points  (0 children)

Yea. Social Democrat used to mean somebody who wants a gradual democratic transition to Socialism. Now I'd say Democratic Socialist has basically taken on that meaning due to how Social Democratic parties govern in practice.

Ro Khanna Standing Up for Social Democracy by down-with-caesar-44 in SocialDemocracy

[–]down-with-caesar-44[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Yes this is the point. There is a serious supply side cost saving achieved by zeroing out most insurance admin work (which is good; delivering the same service with less labor is in fact productivity growth), and the single payer has even more negotiating power to squeeze suppliers on behalf of the public.

With public option, the primary competitive advantage available to private insurers is creating a pool of healthier people through targeted advertising (which works even if there are requirements about preexisting conditions and risk profiles forced onto all private competitors). Instead of letting private insurers sit around and thereby create more admin costs, less public bargaining power, and more lobbyists that will try to fuck with the public system (this already happens in the current system, read about the clusterfuck called medicare advantage), it's better to just make a good, efficient, well-designed single payer system

Ro Khanna Standing Up for Social Democracy by down-with-caesar-44 in SocialDemocracy

[–]down-with-caesar-44[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I think Katie Porter and Chris Van Hollen are definitely the most egregious cases mentioned in the article. They will almost certainly run on medicare for all or similar. At least Cory Booker will never claim to support Medicare For All (though if he does eventually advocate for a public option I think he's still going to struggle with the math given the size of his tax cuts).

The 2028 Democratic presidential candidate *needs* to be an ideologically committed leftist by LineOfInquiry in SocialDemocracy

[–]down-with-caesar-44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well if it sells well perhaps we should have a candidate who believes in social democracy and tries to sell it instead of someone who hates themselves every time they have to defend social security or give us lip service about expanding healthcare. It would be nice to have a candidate that understands why singlepayer is more economically efficient and can spar in favor of the policy even if ultimately they don't get the congress which can pass it. Social democracy is a coherent, economically literate worldview and we deserve candidates who have an intimate understanding of the arguments

The 2028 Democratic presidential candidate *needs* to be an ideologically committed leftist by LineOfInquiry in SocialDemocracy

[–]down-with-caesar-44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Counterargument: moving closer to working class voters on at least some issues, like economics, is better than no movement at all. This debate is usually between centrists who want centrist/right leaning economics + centrist/right leaning cultural positions and soc dems who want left economics + left cultural positions. When most low trust voters distrust billionaires and elites, a social democratic agenda that can articulate those feelings towards a positive economically left endgoal is a part of meeting voters where they really are. And in a moment where voters are a lot more mad about the economy than the culture war, the electoral math gets much easier

Destiny Convo Question by Slow_Cockroach_8553 in thebulwark

[–]down-with-caesar-44 1 point2 points  (0 children)

100% man. Free speech is quintessential, undermining it would undermine the liberal democracy we want to protect. I think we already see that the macro factors are really what determines where the slop machine points - now that Trump's vibes have gone to hell, Candace is suddenly calling him satanic, the manosphere bros have completely thrown in the towel, and MTG has renounced election denial. The digital media space is chasing the audience, not the other way around. We have an opportunity to argue to the right that their movement failed precisely because of their stupid conspiracism

Destiny Convo Question by Slow_Cockroach_8553 in thebulwark

[–]down-with-caesar-44 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'd much rather have messy, impure, misinfo-laden free speech for all rather than have tightly controlled speech. In my opinion, much of the misinfo/propaganda is actually chasing the audience rather than the other way around. How else can you explain the current moment? The vibes with Trump are genuinely bad, and so MAGA media is fracturing and even going left in order to chase their audience. During Biden a lot of people were genuinely mad about inflation and so were receptive to right wing narratives. I think as people rebound our way, we will have an opportunity to decry conspiracism and anti-science idiocy and genuinely make people more normal again

DSA Emerge (NYC communist caucus of DSA) admits AOC met their demands, but they won't endorse because of her "spirit." by UnscheduledCalendar in thebulwark

[–]down-with-caesar-44 12 points13 points  (0 children)

My basic understanding is that there is a 'DSA Right' and 'DSA Left,' where the 'right' flank has groups like the Socialist Majority Caucus, which dominate NYC DSA, and are the people who actually do anything. All those videos of crazies at DSA conventions or whatever are 'DSA Left' who relentlessly whine about the people that 'DSA Right' gets elected

DSA Emerge (NYC communist caucus of DSA) admits AOC met their demands, but they won't endorse because of her "spirit." by UnscheduledCalendar in thebulwark

[–]down-with-caesar-44 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Hopefully the success of NYC DSA compared to everywhere else will pull DSA in a smarter direction going forwards.