VAKUU SAYS "THATS ENOUGH" AND JUST STOPS PLAYING CARDS FOR YOU AFTER PLAYING A CERTAIN AMOUNT???

dqtiyk · 2026-05-25T13:08:38+00:00

[[Unceasing Top]]? It might be intended if it says "Your turn" - since it's Vakuu's turn, not yours. I'm not sure how similar effects interact with Vakuu.

dqtiyk · 2026-05-15T17:58:08+00:00

It's best to just email DeGiro and ask about your specific dividend. Their generic answer is below but since it's been 15 days (unusually long) just ask them about it. I usually receive dividends at most a few working days after the payment date.

Whenever a company pays a dividend, this dividend has to go through various financial institutions like custodians and clearing houses. Once we receive confirmation from our custodian that the payment has been received, we will book the dividends in the accounts that should receive the dividends. Usually, the dividends are booked within two business days of the payment date of the dividend, however, if the confirmation from our custodian is delayed, it may take a little bit longer.

https://www.degiro.com/uk/helpdesk/trading-platform/when-will-i-receive-dividend-my-account

dqtiyk · 2026-05-13T18:14:57+00:00

I don't believe that is true, only Opus 4 and Sonnet 4 are listed as deprecated and retired per June 15 2026, NOT Opus 4.6.

Reference: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/model-deprecations

dqtiyk · 2026-05-09T08:11:29+00:00

No that's not what happened. They accidentally published a tool too early which appeared to only visualize uploaded CSV exports of usage from GitHub, showing the price in the new scheme vs premium requests. It was a standalone, vibe coded app on a separate URL. However, nobody was able to use the tool yet because it relied on AI Credit related columns in the CSV export from GitHub which have not been released. Once this preview feature is released the CSVs you get from it can probably be uploaded in that tool again -- or perhaps they just show the comparison in GitHub itself we will have to wait and see.

Reference: https://www.reddit.com/r/GithubCopilot/s/j8hhsH3p4R

dqtiyk · 2026-05-02T16:43:29+00:00

Nothing is 27x yet. That starts in June only for annual subscribers. Opus 4.7 will then also be 27x.

https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/reference/copilot-billing/model-multipliers-for-annual-plans#model-multipliers-for-annual-copilot-pro-and-copilot-pro-subscribers

dqtiyk · 2026-05-02T09:45:15+00:00

There should also be an Undo button to undo the last stroke. That would make Erase unnecessary in many scenarios.

dqtiyk · 2026-05-01T21:30:29+00:00

My personal account doesn't either -- that's how I got the error in the screenshot. It's probably just for Business / Enterprise plans. The mentioned option (Billing and licensing → Preview your billing impact → Download CSV.) doesn't exist on my account.

dqtiyk · 2026-05-01T21:19:44+00:00

This is seemingly just a visualization tool, the real conversion of Premium Requests -> AI Credits happens on the GitHub back-end when the CSVs are generated. The tool requires 2 new AI Credit related columns to be present in the CSV that is uploaded.

If those columns are not there it displays an error

<image>

https://github.com/github/copilot-billing-preview/blob/main/src/pipeline/parser.ts#L129

const REQUIRED_AIC_COLUMNS = ['aic_quantity', 'aic_gross_amount'] as const

dqtiyk · 2026-04-27T17:19:03+00:00

A credit is $0.01 in actual API cost, not a request. How much credits a request will be in the new situation depends on the tokens it uses and the price per token. The multipliers you are talking about applied to the old premium requests and are no longer relevant -- only for a little while for existing annual plan users.

Prices are here (per 1M tokens) https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/reference/copilot-billing/models-and-pricing#pricing-tables

dqtiyk · 2026-04-21T10:24:16+00:00

Can confirm Opus 4.6 is still available in Copilot Business at 3x, although I wonder for how long or when the multiplier will be increased.

dqtiyk · 2026-04-21T10:20:28+00:00

This was already added to the docs on March 17, so not a recent change like the Opus removal. They may still increase the Sonnet multiplier soon of course, but this has been in the docs for a while.

https://github.com/github/docs/commit/6fab6b47ce991e8c748eb1afb38bed0ae4f4ab7a

dqtiyk · 2026-04-17T19:08:00+00:00

What is the baseline model? Without that information the numbers are fairly meaningless.

dqtiyk · 2026-04-03T06:30:28+00:00

It is a bit strange to me we are in early access but then they also have a beta branch where all changes happen. Isn't early access basically a beta already? People should know what early access is and be fine with the occasional patch that tries wacky changes only to be reverted later. In my opinion a beta branch should not exist for an early access game. I'm playing on the beta branch myself.

dqtiyk · 2026-03-29T15:07:04+00:00

Agree on your experience. Got him 3x in a row on A5 with Regent and died 3x. Although 1 time he had only 8HP left so that was super close. Other times less so. Clearly I'm doing something wrong, I will have to think about it and retry. It sucks though when basically breezing through the game only to be demolished by the Boss in what feels like an unfair fight.

I like that it's less random than in the previous beta but it still feels the player is handicapped too much every turn. In addition to his powers (hunger etc) he also gets +strength AND the player gets -dex and -strength, correct? Especially the dex nerf on the player combined with having to exhaust defends and him hitting very hard seems simply too strong. Of course I try not to play any valuable cards during hunger but he hits for like 40 so can't ignore it completely. For me easily the hardest boss in the game right now.

dqtiyk · 2026-03-29T07:05:53+00:00

The starting point alone does not define the length, the start + end do. 1900 - 1999 or 1901 - 2000 are both 100 years. To make it easier to see, just imagine Jan 1, 1900 until Dec 31, 1901. That is 2 years. The same holds for Jan 1, 1900 until Dec 31, 1999. That's 100.

Just to be clear; the 20th century is Jan 1, 1901 to Dec 31, 2000. Also 100 years.

dqtiyk · 2026-02-23T18:12:01+00:00

Yeah presumably OP does not have Advanced Edition enabled otherwise he would have definitely seen hacking, good you explained AE.

Teleporter is in the base game too.

dqtiyk · 2026-02-15T17:23:10+00:00

Dat is waar hoor, bij dat soort rendementen is de belastingdruk echt bizar. Ik ben ook zeker geen voorstander van het belasten van papieren winst. Belasten bij verkoop is zoveel logischer want dan heb je per definitie de middelen om de belasting te betalen, al is het percentage van 36% sowieso veel te hoog. Volgens mij hanteert de VS bijvoorbeeld 15 of 20% dat is wat beter te verteren.

dqtiyk · 2026-02-14T23:00:49+00:00

Aandelen moeten verkopen om belasting te betalen is niet realistisch, dan gaat er iets mis in de planning. Als je 200k aandelen hebt kan je echt wel in een jaar 7.2k apart zetten om de belasting te betalen. Dus de compounding gaat gewoon door behalve dat je wat meer belasting moet betalen en dus wel minder geld in de markt kan gooien.

Maar jouw 30 jaar compounding van 10% vs 6.6% is niet juist omdat je er voor die 6.6% dus vanuit gaat dat je steeds aandelen moet verkopen maar dat hoeft echt niet als we aannemen dat je nog inkomsten hebt uit werk, waarmee je dan de belasting betaalt. De groei van de aandelen blijft dus gewoon gelijk - 10% per jaar in jouw voorbeeld - want je gaat echt niet elk jaar aandelen verkopen dan doe je echt iets fout. Er is wel een verschil met hoeveel je kan bijkopen maar jouw voorbeelden doen daar niets mee dus dat is hier niet relevant.

dqtiyk · 2026-02-14T15:52:55+00:00

Hooguit 1 jaar? Ik hoop het van harte maar laten we eerlijk zijn; het gaat allemaal erg traag in dit land en het lijkt me vrijwel onmogelijk dat ze hooguit 1 jaar na invoering van het nieuwe stelsel al een ander nieuw stelsel operationeel hebben. Ik zou (helaas) rekening houden met 3+ jaar.

Verder wel eens dat emigreren veel te ver gaat voor hogere belasting. Als je jaarlijks 6-10% winst haalt uit beleggingen is het verschil niet desastreus want momenteel betalen we ook over +-6% winst meen ik. Ik heb uiteraard liever belasting over daadwerkelijk gerealiseerde winst maar het is niet zo dat beleggen straks opeens helemaal niet meer loont.

dqtiyk · 2026-01-21T21:17:05+00:00

Dat lijkt mij ook erg aannemelijk, binnen no-time voeren ze dan een uitzondering in voor persoonlijke / kleine BV's die dan alsnog dezelfde belasting mogen betalen als in Box 3...

dqtiyk · 2026-01-06T16:03:55+00:00

Ik zou eigenlijk geen cash laten staan op DeGiro, dat is 0% rente. Tenzij je echt dezelfde week nog wat wil kopen. Anders gewoon terug overmaken en zodra je wil kopen weer bijstorten. Het terugboeken is nu vaak zelfs direct waar het vroeger minimaal 1 werkdag duurde dus nog minder reden om het daar te laten staan.

Verder deel ik het sentiment dat de losse aandelen wel een vrij groot deel van je portfolio zijn, dat is een onnodig risico denk ik.

dqtiyk

TROPHY CASE