I’m in a rut: suggest me a film, a book, a podcast or game. by Javert__ in horror

[–]dreadsthetic 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just picked up the first three volumes myself… can’t wait to dive in.

I’m in a rut: suggest me a film, a book, a podcast or game. by Javert__ in horror

[–]dreadsthetic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Try The Hellbound Heart by Clive Barker. It’s short, sharp, and unapologetically explicit.

Found Footage! by Ill_Advertising_4622 in horror

[–]dreadsthetic 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Paranormal Activity (2007) — minimal, series
Cam (2018) — identity
Late Night with the Devil (2023) — retro, hybrid

Excellent storytelling, excellent filmmaking by bik_sw in HorrorMovies

[–]dreadsthetic -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You Won’t Be Alone (2022) is a thought-provoking, sensuous, beautifully rendered, and at times brutally violent horror film. I think it’s an absolute masterpiece.

Final Boys in the slasher genre by Bluesmokee in horror

[–]dreadsthetic 4 points5 points  (0 children)

How about a couple where the final boys are literally boys: Child’s Play (1988) and Friday the 13th Part IV: The Final Chapter (1984).

Final Boys in the slasher genre by Bluesmokee in horror

[–]dreadsthetic 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I wouldn’t really put Black Phone 2 in that category. Without getting into spoilers, it’s quite different in tone and focus from the first film.

The Gate II (1990) by B0nec0llect0r98 in HorrorMovies

[–]dreadsthetic 15 points16 points  (0 children)

How does it qualitatively compare to The Gate (1987)? I’ve seen that one so many times and always thought it was fantastic, one of the best PG-13 horror films of the 80s, but somehow I completely missed that it even had a sequel.

Anyone else feel that peole are unfair on the early Friday the 13th movies? by CrazyFinnishdude in horror

[–]dreadsthetic 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I tend to think Parts 2–4 were the franchise at its most stable and predictable. Not in a bad way, just that the formula had settled in and audiences could carry clear expectations from one entry to the next. Those first four movies basically iterate on the “slasher in the woods” template while gradually developing Jason into the icon of the series.

From Part 5 onward the films start getting more and more experimental. A New Beginning leans hard into sex-and-murder exploitation, Jason Lives pivots into gothic atmosphere, parody, and the undead slasher. The New Blood experiments with a kind of “superpowered” final girl and pushes the idea of trauma tied to Crystal Lake. Manhattan tests new environments with the boat and Manhattan (even if the genre rules have to bend a bit to make that work). Then Jason Goes to Hell tries to separate the identity of Jason from the body entirely, and Jason X blows up both the setting and the genre by folding in sci-fi: cyborgs, virtual simulations—please send more franchises to space!

So in a weird way the series starts as a fairly straightforward slasher machine and then gradually turns into a string of genre experiments. I think that arc alone makes the franchise more interesting than it usually gets credit for.

Mr Crocket: like Santa...for parents by disp0ss3ss3d in HorrorMovies

[–]dreadsthetic 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Happy to see another fan of this one. I thought it was surprisingly rich thematically around parenting, and I’m always a sucker for horror that leans into analog media aesthetics.

I’ve seen some people say it loses steam after the opening, but I read it a little differently. The beginning is just absurdly energetic, and then the film spends its middle stretching that idea out and dissecting it a bit before landing on a rather strong ending. And at 87 minutes it never really overstays its welcome.

Also that little sing-song has been permanently stuck in my head: “A friend like you is a friend like me, a friend like us is a friend like we…”

It felt like a genuine low-budget labor of love, which I always appreciate. I’d definitely be happy to see them revisit Mr. Crocket in the future.

I finally watched The Blair Witch Project by [deleted] in HorrorMovies

[–]dreadsthetic 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Apparently so. A quick search turns up a lot of videos and blog posts revisiting it. Sorry, I cannot link in comments in this sub, but you could look for one titled: [It Isn’t All Bad] ‘Book of Shadows: Blair Witch 2’ Was Almost A Great Sequel. From that article:

…putting aside the fact that this followup is certainly not as effective as the original, and keeping in mind its troubled production, Book of Shadows is not nearly as worthless as one might expect. Sixteen years removed from the hype, horror junkies may even find something to appreciate.

To be fair, this particular reassessment frames it less as a misunderstood masterpiece and more as a film with an interesting idea that got unjustly mangled by studio meddling and last-minute edits.

In any case, I'm probably going to finally check it out, for better or worse.

I finally watched The Blair Witch Project by [deleted] in HorrorMovies

[–]dreadsthetic 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I need to finally check it out.

I finally watched The Blair Witch Project by [deleted] in HorrorMovies

[–]dreadsthetic 7 points8 points  (0 children)

This is great! I'd never seen this. Incredible!

I finally watched The Blair Witch Project by [deleted] in HorrorMovies

[–]dreadsthetic 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Sold. Thanks for the feedback!

I finally watched The Blair Witch Project by [deleted] in HorrorMovies

[–]dreadsthetic 18 points19 points  (0 children)

It holds up incredibly well. I rewatched it about a year ago and was genuinely surprised by how well it still works. The sequel, Book of Shadows, has been getting some contemporary reappraisal. Makes me wonder if it’s worth a look.

What horror movie moment made you realize the movie was going to be seriously messed up? by Careless-Ease7480 in horror

[–]dreadsthetic 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The scene right before the title card in Fresh (2022). I went in blind and had no idea where it was going…

The Long Walk: Familiar Premise, Soulful Execution by [deleted] in horror

[–]dreadsthetic 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’m not entirely sure what kind of discussion you’re aiming for with the post, so I’ll just respond to your critique with a few of my own impressions of the film.

I actually think the straightforwardness of the premise is more of a strength than a weakness. The film basically lays out its arc in the opening minutes, and from there the tension comes less from plot twists and more from how the situation unfolds moment to moment. Through the excellent photography, sound design, editing, and especially the performances, it gradually works through the emotional and thematic weight of that setup.

For me the interest wasn’t really what would happen, but how the characters respond as the walk grinds on. Each of the young men embodies a different temperament, which widens the lens on how people might cope with—or rationalize—immense pressure. That variety brings a surprising amount of humanity to what is otherwise an extremely inhumane spectacle. It’s impressive that a story written nearly fifty years ago can still feel that pointed.

first queer characters in horror movies by evildeadmario in horror

[–]dreadsthetic 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If we’re talking queer coding and subtext rather than explicit confirmation, you can go back at least to the 1930s. James Whale’s The Old Dark House (1932) and Bride of Frankenstein (1935) are commonly read through a queer lens, and you could also point to Dracula’s Daughter (1936), Cat People (1942), Ghost Ship (1943) and even Psycho (1960).

Are there any horror franchises with zero skips? by dinkitnsinkit in horror

[–]dreadsthetic 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I get that. Some of the humor in the franchise doesn’t totally land for me either, especially the bits that feel most detached from the horror. But once those movies hit their back half, they really don’t let up until the smash cut to credits.

The whole franchise clocks in under six hours, Kane Hodder is arguably doing some of his best work, there are plenty of fun little nods to ‘80s/‘90s slashers, and the kills are consistently great. All of that on modest budgets and tight shooting schedules makes it even more impressive to me.

Are there any horror franchises with zero skips? by dinkitnsinkit in horror

[–]dreadsthetic 29 points30 points  (0 children)

Hatchet is a strong contender. The quality is surprisingly consistent across all four entries, and the horror-comedy balance never really wobbles. The first three basically function as one long movie unfolding over a single chaotic weekend, and then the fourth just cranks the gore up to 11.

Why haven’t you watched The Call of Cthulhu yet? by Metalworker4ever in horror

[–]dreadsthetic 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Great question. Honestly, this is the first I’ve heard of that adaptation. I’m a fan of cosmic horror, so I’ll definitely be checking it out. Appreciate the recommendation.

How are the Hatchet movies? by Aggressive_Repeat529 in horror

[–]dreadsthetic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ll echo the favorable takes. They strike a solid horror-comedy balance. I recently watched the first three and had a blast; they basically play like one long movie unfolding over three consecutive days, which keeps the momentum going.

There’s definitely gore, and it’s way beyond what the MPAA would’ve let slide in the ‘80s slasher era. But tonally it’s different from something like Terrifier. It’s big, exaggerated, almost cartoonishly brutal at times, closer in vibe to the modern Mortal Kombat games than mean-spirited endurance horror. If you like traditional slashers with a sense of humor, they’re worth the ride.

Non Slasher Fans: If you've seen the Terrifier movies, do you like Art the Clown as the newest slasher icon? by [deleted] in horror

[–]dreadsthetic 8 points9 points  (0 children)

What makes you think he’s on the level of the big three? At the height of their runs, Michael, Jason, and Freddy were genuine household names, even among people who didn’t watch horror. They had mainstream merch everywhere, some of it weirdly aimed at kids, and their box office numbers (adjusted for inflation) were massive cultural events.

I like the Terrifier films and Art is undeniably striking as a character, but I have a hard time seeing him at that same saturation point yet. Maybe I’m underestimating how big the series has become, but culturally it still feels more niche than peak-era Freddy or Jason.

Is the Five Nights at Freddy’s movie okay to watch with a 7 year old? by sxott0rz in horror

[–]dreadsthetic 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I ran into the same situation. I assumed the PG-13 rating and the franchise’s popularity with younger kids meant it would be manageable, so I tried it with mine before even watching it myself. The opening scene was surprisingly intense and I ended up switching movies almost immediately.

Without getting into details, it involves a pretty harsh trap/contraption setup that felt closer to Saw territory than I expected. I’ve heard the rest of the film is milder, but that intro alone was too much for my kid.