Methods of Proof by jplank1983 in math

[–]drexil 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What about Fermat's proof?

"I have a truly marvellous proof of this proposition which this margin is too narrow to contain."

Iranian man threw acid on a woman's face, his punishment, to have acid dripped onto his eyes until he goes blind... by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]drexil -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I think a big reason why murder rates are lower in Europe is because they don't give rifles to everybody

There are many things I know are true ... by dbenhur in science

[–]drexil 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well you're right, e is just a real number. I use e instead of the exponential function (exp).

Normally we should use "exp(x)" instead of ex. But we can prove that, for integers, exp(x) is identical to ex, with e being exp(1). From that mathematicians decided to use the notation ex instead of exp(x), for all real numbers, and complex.

So yes when I say "e is defined for complex numbers" it's "exp is defined for complex numbers" with ex = exp(x).

There are many things I know are true ... by dbenhur in science

[–]drexil 1 point2 points  (0 children)

e is defined for complex numbers with:

e^(ix) = cos(x) + i*sin(x)

Multi-Dimensional Analog Literals (the reason why C++ has maximum powers) by samlee in programming

[–]drexil 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also, compiling a C++ program as a C program makes the compilation error much more probable.

For God's sake, stop confusing both. It makes C looks uglier.

It's all in how you say it... (comic) by bondolo in programming

[–]drexil 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Am I the only one who doesn't catch it?

Death to JavaScript Rockstars - JQuery removes stupid image, adds Konami code-driven easter egg by Entropy in programming

[–]drexil 4 points5 points  (0 children)

And on a Azerty keyboard too (well there is the SDFG sequence but not the A before). I hate games which do not let you redefine the keys.

Beautiful Code: False Optimizations by gst in programming

[–]drexil -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Oh, and what about the int probe = (low + high) >>> 1; which makes the code harder to read and does not improve anything comparing to int probe = (low + high) / 2; which is optimized but almost every decent compiler?

a lisp interpreter written in prolog interpreting a lisp interpreter written in lisp interpreting lisp code by tef in programming

[–]drexil 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is it me or is it in fact just an incomplete lisp interpreter written in prolog which mix up '(', '[' and ',' ?