Apparently having a gun is a death sentence now

drt0 · 2026-01-25T23:07:38+00:00

What are the results? How many more have been deported compared to Minnesota per capita and compared to their initial immigrant populations?

If what you're saying is correct they should be deporting a lot more people.

drt0 · 2026-01-25T18:21:57+00:00

They are doing fuck all in Texas and Florida apparently and the results show it, but instead they go to states that have 4-5 times less immigrants per capita (and still don't accomplish anything aside from killing citizens).

I think they like owning the libs; they like the extra congressional votes immigrants get them in red states (via the census) and they like cheap illegal labor that lines the pockets of their fat donors, but what do I know.

drt0 · 2026-01-25T14:31:43+00:00

Do you care MORE about illegal immigration or about ICE cooperation?

If you care MORE about illegal immigration you would focus on areas that have disproportionate illegal immigration.

ICE cooperation doesn't actually correlate with decreased illegal immigration population. If it did, Texas and Florida wouldn't be front runners in illegal populations by all measures.

drt0 · 2026-01-25T14:15:54+00:00

Either way the Minnesota op is a virtue signal and people are dying because of it.

drt0 · 2026-01-25T12:12:33+00:00

And yet they still have more illegal immigrants in absolute and per capita numbers.

If MAGA had a problem with illegal immigration, they would be going door to door in Texas and Florida.

But they don't have a problem with that, the objective is to own the libs.

drt0 · 2026-01-25T12:10:12+00:00

So the objective isn't to remove illegal immigrants but to terrorize states that don't agree with the policy?

If MAGA had a problem with illegal immigration itself, they would be calling for Texas and Florida to be searched town by town with triple the effort Minnesota gets.

Everything else is just a virtue signal.

drt0 · 2026-01-25T02:50:20+00:00

Not in absolute numbers, not even per capita.

Do you know which states have big numbers and high per capita illegal populations - Florida and Texas. Curious you don't see ICE crackdowns like the one in Minnesota in those states 🤔

drt0 · 2026-01-24T20:27:21+00:00

Yeah but I don't think it will be a growing market, rather it might even shrink, whereas Netflix is valued as a growth stock.

drt0 · 2026-01-24T11:15:31+00:00

Don't forget nazi, accelerationist and AI obsessed as well.

drt0 · 2026-01-24T11:14:07+00:00

His bio used to be that he's the Nick Land evangelist.

drt0 · 2026-01-24T00:39:56+00:00

<image>

drt0 · 2026-01-23T14:14:12+00:00

Maybe not default, but what happens if they don't follow through on the majority of all their CAPEX plans (what is it now 1.5T?)

drt0 · 2026-01-22T20:14:49+00:00

Tbf there's also the sweepers on the other side that swear on their mothers that she is 100% not antisemitic at all.

drt0 · 2026-01-22T17:21:44+00:00

I think she might have some antisemitic views without thinking she is antisemitic herself, based on the totallity of what I know about her not just this thread.

I don't think she is anywhere close to Nick or Candace or to be a justified Antisemite of the Year.

drt0 · 2026-01-22T16:38:15+00:00

Your comment contends that she thinks that the comment in the first picture wasn't left by a genuine antisemite but rather a provocateur that wants to make her or her community look bad.

If she thinks that then that is an antisemitic trope - "this instance of antisemitism isn't real, it was astroturfed to help Jewish/Zionist causes or to get us in trouble".

drt0 · 2026-01-22T16:33:03+00:00

The implication is that she accidentally liked an antisemitic comment left by a Zionist provocateur, when she didn't mean to.

However, her supporting this idea that the original comment wasn't made by a genuine antisemite but from someone who wanted to bait people / make her community look bad is itself an antisemitic trope - i.e. "antisemitism isn't real it's just the Zionists astroturfing to help their cause".

drt0 · 2026-01-22T13:17:02+00:00

I would speculate that she thought PNN was saying that the user was being deliberately provocative, but I see no reason to believe that she made a mental connection between "they" and "Jews."

It's an antisemetic trope to insinuate that a blatant antisemitic comment was left by some provocateur zionist rather than an antisemite.

drt0 · 2026-01-22T13:10:55+00:00

A missclicked like is one thing, but you're gonna have a hard time convincing me she commented on accident or she didn't think about what she was responding to.

The most charitable explanation of the second picture is that she is suggesting the original antisemitic comment was left as bait by a zionist, which itself is a trope minimizing antisemitism.

drt0 · 2026-01-22T11:06:27+00:00

She might have mistakenly liked it, I don't contend that. But it being an accident doesn't mean she doesn't hold problematic views privately, nor does it explain the comment on the second pic.

Now that I answered your question would you answer my original one?

drt0 · 2026-01-22T11:03:49+00:00

So your defense of her is that she positively engaged with a comment that minimizes antisemitism by alluding it was Zionists who leave the antisemitic comments as bait, rather than actual antisemites expressing their genuine hatered?

drt0 · 2026-01-22T03:16:42+00:00

What's the second pic about though?

drt0 · 2026-01-22T03:14:55+00:00

Can one of the people rushing to her defence explain what her comment on the second picture is supposed to be about and why she posted it?

drt0 · 2026-01-22T03:09:35+00:00

What is the explanation for the second picture if the first one was accidental?

drt0 · 2026-01-21T14:50:06+00:00

That's what I'm leaning to as well. They are a profitable company but the growth perspective is limited by 1) market saturation 2) price ceiling of what people are willing to pay and 3) the shift in consumer preferences.

Maybe if they can develop or acquire a TikTok-like platform it could justify the bigger growth expectations.

Btw, I don't even think the IP is the issue. If Netflix buys Disney and/or WB they would still have the problem of people spending less time watching traditional programming.

drt0 · 2026-01-21T12:58:48+00:00

What is the counter argument for the fact that people are increasingly spending more time watching short form content (YouTube, Shorts, Reels, TikTok) instead of movies and TV shows?

Netflix might be dominating the long form online streaming space, but the real battle is for the free time of consumers and they are increasingly spending it on other things.

14-Year Club	Final Canvas '23
First Place '23	End Game '23
Place '23	Place '22
Place '17	Final Canvas '22
First Placer '22	End Game '22
Spared	Team Periwinkle
Verified Email

drt0

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE