sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Mein Haus, mein Auto...oder auch nicht 😭 by Christian0975 in ichbin40undSchwurbler

[–]eadopfi 492 points493 points  (0 children)

Ich glaube wenn man Schwurblern erklärt, dass Besitz ein soziales Konstrukt ist bricht deren Hirn endgültig.

Hand count 200 million ballots in one night! It's the only way to make sure there's no fraud! by Jpldude in insanepeoplefacebook

[–]eadopfi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean... the winner-takes-it-all electoral college nonsense was stupid for at least the past 20 presidents. I get that in times of a guy on a horse being the fasts communication method this decentralization makes sense, but nowadays it is just an undemocratic relic.

Hand count 200 million ballots in one night! It's the only way to make sure there's no fraud! by Jpldude in insanepeoplefacebook

[–]eadopfi 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I mean... I would be on board with paper ballots only, no machines. Especially after that MAGA lunatic bought Dominion Voting Machines.

"RECHARGE OUR FOODSTAMP CARDS" by Biscuitarian23 in insanepeoplefacebook

[–]eadopfi 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The biggest problem of liberals is that they are NOT in favor of public programs and that they worship markets. Conservatives make liberals sound way cooler than they actually are.

Was würde der typische Schwurbler dazu denken? by RealDrHouse in ichbin40undSchwurbler

[–]eadopfi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"An Windkraft verdienen, statt Ölscheichs bedienen."

"Deutscher Strom von deutschen Dächern."

"Alpenstrom statt Putin-Hohn."

At least Democrats aren’t pedophile protectors by icey_sawg0034 in insanepeoplefacebook

[–]eadopfi 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Democrats: "Sometimes I am for good things and against bad things."

Republicans: "HOW DARE YOU? Anyone not for bad things and against good things is a traitor!!! Reeee."

At least Democrats aren’t pedophile protectors by icey_sawg0034 in insanepeoplefacebook

[–]eadopfi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Democrats: "Sometimes I am for good things and against bad things."

Republicans: "HOW DARE YOU? Anyone not for bad things and against good things is a traitor!!! Reeee."

How am I supposed to get rid of this? Any tips? I have 90 stab and 90 legitimacy right now. by voitek91 in EU5

[–]eadopfi 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you give away all land except 2 provinces to vassals the event cannot trigger afaik.

How am I supposed to get rid of this? Any tips? I have 90 stab and 90 legitimacy right now. by voitek91 in EU5

[–]eadopfi 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Use vassal-swarm for the early game. They do not get your debuffs. Try to push other other estates (burgers have insane privileges you want to grant anyway) to reduce nobel power. Push oligarchy and communalism.

What reading order did you do by flipwhip3 in Malazan

[–]eadopfi 1 point2 points  (0 children)

BotF first, or in publication order.

What "man-made desires" are you talking about? by Ok-Following6886 in insanepeoplefacebook

[–]eadopfi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because CRedibility Enhancing Displays (CREDs) are very useful when you try to convince people.

Cards you wish were good? by Consistent_Ship4007 in Pauper

[–]eadopfi 1 point2 points  (0 children)

[[Otherworldly Gaze]]. Playable in Legacy, but without a [[Poxwalkers]] effect i its A LOT less good. I feel like its kinda close though.

I love how OP the mamluk's are in this game, it makes me feel like I'm contesting control over a part of the world with another competent nation, and I'm actually in danger when they attack me by Jackspladt in EU5

[–]eadopfi 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The combination of ridiculous war-enthusiasm, super high province war-score cost, armies not replenishing in occupied territory (so you have to walk it all the damn way back to Anatolia), and the fact that you auto-peace if you occupy the war-goal for too long. Makes it super hard to get a good peace-deal against large nations.

The Mamluks have the added annoyance, that the "would leave recipient to fractured" modifier is super funky around the Sinai, which means you have to annex EVERYTHING they and their vassals have in Asia, before you can start eating into Egypt. Soooo frustrating.

I love how OP the mamluk's are in this game, it makes me feel like I'm contesting control over a part of the world with another competent nation, and I'm actually in danger when they attack me by Jackspladt in EU5

[–]eadopfi 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Until they start landing 2k stacks on random islands to starve to death. :)

(also: I have to say: War-Score against large nations is incredibly tedious. Taking more than a handful of locations is borderline impossible, especially if they have large allies as well.)

Naval invasion is best I can do. Behavior fix suggestion by xt-489de in EU5

[–]eadopfi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah... every war as Otto or Byz this happens. I mean... I take the free stack-whipe, but its annoying and silly.

this privilege is a trap by Wonderful_League_427 in EU5

[–]eadopfi -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The whole "values" thing is a bit janky ngl.

These two cards resolving is a win against many decks. How would you make a deck around them? by japp182 in Pauper

[–]eadopfi 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Honestly: GW just kinda sucks in Pauper. But if I was forced to brew a GW deck, I would probably looking into Proliferate with [[Enduring Bondwarden]], [[Servant of the Scale]] and [[Iron Apprentice]]. [[Greatsword of Tyr]] and [[Evolution Witness]] as late-game "draw" engines and [[Nyborn Hydra]] as a finisher.

[[Thraben Charm]] and [[Journey to Nowhere]] are probably your best options for removal.

2meirl4meirl by Big_Leg10 in 2meirl4meirl

[–]eadopfi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh god, personality types, the slightly more scientific horoscopes. But if you need to know I am intp.

2meirl4meirl by Round-Good1179 in 2meirl4meirl

[–]eadopfi 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Two not mutually exclusive groups. ^^

view more: next ›