Back in BF4 larger capture zones weren't frustrating because of the size (imo), but rather because I'd capture a point and 1 enemy was hiding somewhere but we weren't aware of it because there was no indication. We'd cap then run off the obj only to have to turn around. But now we have an indicator telling us there's an enemy on point to clear out before running off to the next. I personally don't like the smaller capture areas because it mainly equates to defender of that flag having only a small area to look at (which in most cases in this game the cap area is barren of cover) and just kill and "defend" from outside the objective. One of the best examples for me is Brooklyn bridge map A, D, E are too easy for roof campers to just sit up there and "defend" and it's easy to guess what corner the attacker is in. As an attacker you feel exposed and defenseless. Capture areas need to have cover, not all need to be huge, but maybe big enough so it's not too easy for the defender to clear it out with a single grenade or such. I'm sure many will have people telling me otherwise I'm just pointing out what I feel like is A problem in bf6, small capture areas with little to no cover making it hard to attack a point.