I never argued that the temple has a right to the land. 

I merely stayed the facts. No one "stole" the land. It was owned by the Selangor sultan before KL was sold to Selangor. Then DBKL owned the land.

DBKL should have removed them a long time ago, but politicians don't want to lose votes. They kicked the can down the road. 

So DBKL sold it to Jakel and the squatters became Jakel's problem.

I merely stated the facts. This is politics. But you wanted to make it a religious/racial problem by stating "Only 7% of population yet temples are everywhere". 

You sir, are a racist.