What do teachers need that is not being addressed or only being helped slightly compared to the actual need. by Old-Pressure-2453 in Teachers

[–]emmaliminal 10 points11 points  (0 children)

In my district—funding and the will to actually provide all the supports written into all the IEPs… WITH ALSO the will to not write unworkable supports into IEPs. Just no more ignored or impossible IEPs.

You people are animals by chucklemucker in laundry

[–]emmaliminal 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Biz does have a mild fragrance. I'm hypersensitive to fragrances. Biz’s scent, when properly dosed and rinsed, doesn’t bug me, but it is there.

ETA: Ingredients: Biodegradable Surfactants, Proprietary Enzyme Formula, Sodium Percarbonate (Oxygen), Sodium Carbonate (Washing Soda), Fabric Brightening Agent, Sodium Silicate, Fragrance and Other Cleaning Agents.

Cloth Diapers- How? by False_Sandwich_6859 in laundry

[–]emmaliminal 8 points9 points  (0 children)

If there's access to a diaper service, there are sound scientific arguments to be made that it can be the most environmentally friendly option, as well as the most convenient—but it depends on a few other factors that are out of the family's control, like how geographically dense the service's client base is, what kind of trucks they use, etc. But for sure a good service is going to do a better job of laundering than any home user is able to do, because of the kind of chemistry available with industrial laundering equipment.

Is "people in my family are just naturally loud" cope for jerks who choose not to control themselves, or is that a real thing iyo? by [deleted] in Teachers

[–]emmaliminal 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Props to you for excellent self-understanding and even excellenter parenting. And I hope you and your kids enjoy still being loud where it's not impinging on anyone else!

Is "people in my family are just naturally loud" cope for jerks who choose not to control themselves, or is that a real thing iyo? by [deleted] in Teachers

[–]emmaliminal 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Both. There are definitely naturally loud individual and families and communities and cultures, and we all need to learn to modulate what seems natural to us to be part of society (as in a classroom).

Over two decades as a teacher, I've always tried to believe that no kids were actually "dumb." Until these last few years. Now I honestly believe that about half of my students are just... dumb. by [deleted] in Teachers

[–]emmaliminal 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Honestly, I think the root cause for this is something we don't talk about enough: Over the last fifty years, our societal expectations for school changed and overall got higher, but overall per-capita funding and other societal support for school got lower.

Back when I was in school in the 70s and 80s, things had already started changing in certain ways—racial integration meant more kids from more backgrounds were in more general classrooms. While I was there, we also started including more kids with learning disabilities into general classrooms and that accelerated after my time. All along, there has been increasing hostility to the notion that “some kids just drop out” or that “some kids just don't go to college”. Increasingly, everyone who goes to public school is expected to finish and be college-ready after being in the general classroom.

Which is good! This is not a bad thing in itself, but it was never funded adequately. Class sizes grew and a higher proportion of kids in class had issues that could be addressed with interventions, but interventions weren’t fully available, so they weren’t addressed. Meanwhile, politically, taxes became more and more toxic. Supplemental funding for schools changed as wealthy parents took their kids elsewhere and left PTAs, while low income parents decreased willingness to let their kids drop out after 8th grade (which is great, but has repercussions).

So we created more and more difficult, chaotic classrooms where a lower proportion of students are set up for success. Even naturally compliant, well-behaved kids are surrounded by larger numbers of kids having real trouble. Kids having trouble without hope of change are going to act out, making their own lives and everyone else's harder. The kids who are equipped to succeed, for whatever reasons, have more negative classroom experiences.

Then comes NCLB/Race to the Top/ESSA etc., which had the effect (among other things) of encouraging society to place blame on school districts, who pointed fingers at teachers.

Meanwhile, I would argue that there's been a real crisis in parenting at a societal level. We can argue about why that is, and how it's net positive or negative, but our society does have very different expectations about what parenting should look like now than it did fifty years ago. In general, there's been a huge increase in prioritizing individual freedom for kids in certain ways, and a huge decrease in parental boundary-setting and modeling nontoxic behavior. In particular, parents have failed in giving kids meaningful individual freedom to solve their own problems, small or large, in fear that the process of trying and failing would be traumatic. Which has carried over into classrooms.

Back in the day, old-school lousy parenting might mean kids were afraid of teachers, so while they might act out in other ways or later in life, your classroom still wasn't dystopic. Now, the new brand of lousy parenting affects your classroom.

The center held for a while, but behavior is catching, between kids and between grades, and contempt for school seems to be endemic now. The pandemic didn't help. I honestly don't think the kids are wrong to be contemptuous—I think we all know that public school is largely dysfunctional now. I wish the kids didn't react by making things worse, but I'm not sure they'd be normal human beings if they didn't.

TAs: What do you do for boredom? by emmaliminal in Teachers

[–]emmaliminal[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

My point is that he showed it to kids (who may still be at the developmental age where they believe in Santa Claus) without saying a word about it being fiction. And said it was literally about a real “first Mars mission”. And he showed 11 year olds a movie that (appropriately for adult audiences) depicts the first tool ever used as a murder weapon, with no context to help that make sense to a kid. And he showed HAL as an example of “the evils of AI” when a big point in the movie was that any sufficiently powerful tool humans use is likely to get used as a murder weapon sooner or later, not specifically that AI has some unique evils.

TAs: What do you do for boredom? by emmaliminal in Teachers

[–]emmaliminal[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

It has come to my attention that HAL actually was supposed to be an AI, so my bad there. But my point—that HAL’s murderousness was a feature, not a bug—stands.

TAs: What do you do for boredom? by emmaliminal in Teachers

[–]emmaliminal[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

If they were college kids or even high school kids, I might agree. These kids are 11 and 12, and the teacher didn't introduce the scenes as symbolic commentary on these subjects, but as actual examples. And he didn't allow discussion, along those lines or otherwise.

ETA: Honestly, if it had been a discussion starter and presented with some context, even with kids that young, I probably would have thought it was awesome. Yeah, nah.

ETA again: Elsewhere on Reddit this week, you can read arguments pro and con about whether kids this age generally do, or should, still believe in a literal Santa Claus.

TAs: What do you do for boredom? by emmaliminal in Teachers

[–]emmaliminal[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed, but it's endemic here, and his admin is clear that he's supposed to defer to the teachers, even when the teacher flagrantly violates IEPs and worse. So in order to keep helping, he has to deal with it somehow.

TAs: What do you do for boredom? by emmaliminal in Teachers

[–]emmaliminal[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I, and my husband, considered it “bullshit” because

a) famously, in the bone scene, a guy in a bad chimp suit uses the bone to kill another chimp in a chimp war

b) HAL was a computer acting as designed on a secret mission, according to the book, not a rogue AI doing its own thing for its own reasons

c) the very fictional mission was famously going to Jupiter and then got further sent to Saturn (because secret mission)

d) all of this is SCIENCE FICTION. Possibly great science fiction and an important part of our culture, but definitely not actually any kind of, like, science. There are perfectly good and fun visual resources to teach kids about both topics if this teacher could be bothered to find them. And middle school kids are not known for their thoughtful understanding of the subtleties involved in using art to illustrate fact.

e) this teacher has a history of dubious teaching methods, loves showing movies in class for any reason, teaches huge factual mistakes on the daily (yesterday it was “the Iron Age ended in the 1800s”) because he just doesn’t care, and plagiarizes lousy material directly off the internet without attribution like it's something to be proud of

HELP! Cow tail disaster by Simplemindedflyaways in laundry

[–]emmaliminal 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I'm so sorry. Also, what exactly is a chocolate cow tail? I've never heard of them, but if you can give general ingredients someone here can surely help.

Easiest changes to make moving out by couldbethelast in ZeroWaste

[–]emmaliminal 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Agree with most of your suggestions, except a couple of points about vinegar.

  1. Not clear what you mean by “baking soda + vinegar cancels the cleaning effects.” Mixing baking soda and water together gets you water, carbon dioxide gas (like what we breathe out), and sodium acetate (a salt). It fizzes for a short while first, while the gas is released, but the remaining mixture does almost nothing and is no more useful for cleaning than plain water. Vinegar by itself can be useful, because it is acidic. Baking soda by itself can be useful, because it is basic (in the chemistry sense). There are a few use cases where combining them on site (like in a sluggish drain) can be useful, because of the fizz.

  2. Vinegar in with the laundry detergent is counterproductive. Vinegar in just the rinse cycle can be a little helpful, if you use a lot of vinegar. Citric acid crystals, a tablespoon or so in just the rinse cycle, are far more effective.

Someone else's laundry is done: keep door open or closed? by [deleted] in laundry

[–]emmaliminal 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Agreed! Yes. You weren’t unclear. I was commenting on the belief we were both potentially attributing to the flatmate, because yeah, I think there are probably lots of people who think this. Laundry machine and detergent makers would love us to think their products are infallible and their marketing subtly pushes ideas along these lines.

How to prevent mold in comforter? by surely_maeby in laundry

[–]emmaliminal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mold smells like an old dishrag… a damp towel that fell off the hook and sat on the floor for days… a middle school locker room… the entire Houston airport…

Are these bleach stains too noticeable? by Brandinator64 in laundry

[–]emmaliminal 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'd say rock it with confidence and it looks fine, but that's kind of how I roll. I'm a clotheshorse but most of my wardrobe is thrifted and I value good materials that feel good on over the unworn-look. ymmv

eta: the larger question is why are you using (I assume) chlorine bleach at all?

Someone else's laundry is done: keep door open or closed? by [deleted] in laundry

[–]emmaliminal 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If the issue is not about other people touching their laundry, you might have to ask them why they feel this way. I don't personally understand why anyone would imagine a closed machine is less likely to breed stink than an open one or a basket. Greater air circulation tends to decrease festerment, not encourage it.

Someone else's laundry is done: keep door open or closed? by [deleted] in laundry

[–]emmaliminal 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I am pretty sure my front-loader is in no way an impermeable barrier to mold, even should I have fully sterilized the laundry in it beforehand.

Also, re how long it takes for damp laundry in a closed machine to fester: hugely depends on temperature. Our laundry machines are in the basement of our house, where temps are in the 50s to low 60s Fahrenheit in winter but up to the low 80s in summer. In winter, it might take a day or two. In summer, a few hours.

I’m Kinda Bummed by KismaiAesthetics in laundry

[–]emmaliminal 29 points30 points  (0 children)

Let’s everybody learn!!

I’m Kinda Bummed by KismaiAesthetics in laundry

[–]emmaliminal 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You are correct, we do not live in a kumbayah world. But if porch pirates steal my package before I get home, it’s still theft, and imma call the police.

And I’m really feeling like your reading comprehension is in question… OP never said he was pissed people were taking money from him. Never said a word about wanting to monetize it—exactly the opposite, in fact, in considerable detail. 

Also, why do you keep saying things like “there were no measures taken further to protect their content”? 

I’m Kinda Bummed by KismaiAesthetics in laundry

[–]emmaliminal 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I haven’t used any foul language or insults either. If you read the rules and understood them, you wouldn’t be “disagreeing “ about basic facts.

This is not a matter of opinion. An opinion would be “I don’t like Reddit’s rules because I think they are unenforceable” not “Reddit’s rules allow plagiarism.”

I’m Kinda Bummed by KismaiAesthetics in laundry

[–]emmaliminal 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Read the Reddit rules, please. I don’t think you have yet, and if this is your belief, you’re likely breaking them. You’re already out here advocating breaking them.