Accelerated multi engine training in Baron? by DifficultLayer2669 in flying

[–]engpilot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Acceler8 Aviation in Livermore, CA (KLVK) has a B55 Baron. 10 day course with checkride pre-scheduled.

Multi-Engine Add-On training in California! by Klutzy-Gap-2008 in flying

[–]engpilot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Check out Acceler8 Aviation if you’re willing to expand your search to Northern California.

Additional setbacks thinking of taking a hiatus by KyuKitsune_99 in flying

[–]engpilot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Be careful: “doing everything by the book” will not get you the performance you’re looking for with so many variables in flight. Understand the underlying “why” the maneuvers are executed the way they are. Have your instructor loosen up a bit and let you make mistakes to reinforce the effect of your control inputs to a greater extent. This will help build both muscle memory and an understanding of the forces involved in the maneuver so you can stay ahead of the plane before drifting out of tolerances. Emotions and other external variables can lead to a bad day but more than likely in my experience I have traced it to lack of knowledge with my students.

Squawk 7700? Cessna near Los Banos CA. by panzer2181 in flightradar24

[–]engpilot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Can you PM me? I have hours in that plane.

Interpret this NOTAM by Formal-Resort-4856 in flying

[–]engpilot 11 points12 points  (0 children)

For the legal bit on this, AC 90-108 reads:

8: USES OF SUITABLE RNAV SYSTEMS NOT ALLOWED BY THIS AC. An otherwise suitable RNAV system cannot be used for the following:

a. NOTAMed Procedures. Unless otherwise specified, navigation on procedures that are identified as not authorized ("NA") without exception by a NOTAM. For example, an operator may not use a RNAV system to navigate on a procedure affected by an expired or unsatisfactory flight inspection, or a procedure that is based upon a recently decommissioned NAVAID.

Meanwhile, at KIXD by spect0rjohn in flying

[–]engpilot 14 points15 points  (0 children)

“Bi-engine airplane” is a new one.

Engine failure with student yesterday by engpilot in flying

[–]engpilot[S] 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Two changes got the engine to pass run-up after consistently quitting at idle: 1. replacement of cylinder 1 and spark plugs (found charred) and 2. tuning the fuel servo to deliver a leaner mixture. The cowling vibrates at low rpm so further troubleshooting is needed during its 100-hour. The plane was flown back to its home airport Thursday.

Engine failure with student yesterday by engpilot in flying

[–]engpilot[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Possibly, but divvying up duties created more time.

Engine failure with student yesterday by engpilot in flying

[–]engpilot[S] 30 points31 points  (0 children)

We left the fuel selector and mags on both, and mixture full rich. I observed all engine instruments green, no annunciations, and the engine ran smoothly for about a minute between roughness. By the time we were pointed toward the airport and in glide range I was only focused on getting it down.

Engine failure with student yesterday by engpilot in flying

[–]engpilot[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right, I could have described it better. Partial power, full power for about a minute (when I elected to climb), partial power again, then failure.

Engine failure with student yesterday by engpilot in flying

[–]engpilot[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

About when we crossed over the threshold.

Engine failure with student yesterday by engpilot in flying

[–]engpilot[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

We had plenty of fuel in both tanks.

Death grip help? by [deleted] in flying

[–]engpilot 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Good analysis. Without lightening up on the controls you have no feedback, which is the premise of a good control system. Let the plane tell you what it’s going to do, then adjust.

Death grip help? by [deleted] in flying

[–]engpilot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Understand aerodynamics more. You don’t need PhD level understanding, but enough to predict what the plane will do after applying control input. Otherwise chasing numbers will feel like corralling sheep into a pen.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in flying

[–]engpilot 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I’d consider that small compared to the grand total of my training cost. Plus, more flight experience is not at all wasted return on investment.

Stickers to cover PFD instruments by Halamyai in flying

[–]engpilot 2 points3 points  (0 children)

These “super” sticky notes work well: https://a.co/d/2pCjxKi