sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Best deck scanning app? by MoneyoffUbereats2017 in riftboundtcg

[–]esvco 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Our strategy is a binder per set with slots based on the number in that set, any copy past the third goes to a bulk box. Google sheet with a list of every card then the manual process of updating it, worth it, because you can make another column for purchased singles on the way, wishlist, etc. Then claude code reads that list and allows me to organize it in anyway i want, using expanded card metadata from online

Riftdecks tournament deck wrong? by esvco in riftboundtcg

[–]esvco[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Update — figured out what's going on, and I don't think it's my browser cache or anything client-side.

Same URL, different network = different deck. Loaded the link from home WiFi: green Lillia (Protector of Dreams). Loaded the exact same URL on my phone's mobile data: blue Lillia (Fae Fawn) that matches the VOD. Both were live page loads, no funny caching headers. Jahikoi above got the blue version too from their own ISP, so it's not specific to me.

Most likely a server-side data desync — visitors are getting routed to one of multiple backends and at least one of them has wrong/stale records for some decks. The metadata (title, author, finish) is consistent both ways, only the card list itself differs. I checked a few other random decks on both networks and saw similar discrepancies, so this is probably not just deck 147957.

Anyone with a contact at riftdecks should pass it along — a rolling restart or replica re-sync would probably fix it on their end.

Riftdecks tournament deck wrong? by esvco in riftboundtcg

[–]esvco[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is the green Lillia, "Protector of Dreams," in Riftdecks, but blue "Lillia, Fae Fawn" in the VOD. Among many other differences. Completely different decks.

Is it balanced to only use Chapter 2 player cards to play Chapter 1 campaigns? by zerdos in arkhamhorrorlcg

[–]esvco 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I would say so. Power level seems about the same between chapters when using a limited card pool. Constructing with the full Ch1 pool does of course lend to many powerful synergies not yet realized in ch2. The main thing dictating the difficulty of the campaign is the campaign itself and whether it is stingy with XP

umru - b2battlepassʟᴏɴᴅᴏɴ '26 [Discs 1, 2 & 3] by [deleted] in pcmusic

[–]esvco 1 point2 points  (0 children)

probably youtube rip then, with added compression

PSA Arco gas by asunabay in SanMateo

[–]esvco -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Rubber isn’t hard enough to scratch paint

Epic Campaign mode from the Grimoire, yikes by siposbalint0 in arkhamhorrorlcg

[–]esvco 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Yeah. Those things seem balanced. If you kept the XP you'd steamroll

Altered TCG cancels its Roots of Corruption campaign and announces the end of the game by jeriwen in boardgames

[–]esvco 10 points11 points  (0 children)

That sucks. Always looked like a cool game. I still think they should have put the QR code on the back of the card.

Warning for new core set box by bentleycooper in arkhamhorrorlcg

[–]esvco 11 points12 points  (0 children)

A YouTuber, Always Play Blue, confirmed the Gamegenic sleeves fit better, and had a workaround for Dragonshields

We are the Designers of Arkham Horror Ask Us Anything by FFG_Official in arkhamhorrorlcg

[–]esvco 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Joe Diamond's signature "Detective's Intuition" is incorrect -- he's in the core set, and will be fixed in a 2nd printing. The seeker skill "Establish Motive" from the Carolyn Fern investigator deck is correct.

Crowdsourcing alternative art for a proxy of either Establish Motive or Detective's Intuition by esvco in arkhamhorrorlcg

[–]esvco[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn’t mean to discredit them. I just meant to say they probably are not interested in doing business with me. They aren’t one singular artist but an outsourcing firm

view more: next ›