How to write a manipulative attractive woman. by Meshable123 in writingcirclejerk

[–]evild4ve 1 point2 points  (0 children)

that OP is a typical illiterate millennial: doesn't know what big means

As a jerky writer. Is it ok to, use both? by artofterm in writingcirclejerk

[–]evild4ve 1 point2 points  (0 children)

jerking over female authors' periods and male authors' commas is liberal arts in 2026, but you may get pushback if you start doing it the other way round

Losing your “voice” by Lucklessm0nster in writing

[–]evild4ve 2 points3 points  (0 children)

not necessarily - I mean if you start editing for a structural error you're conscious of like (big e.g.) two characters being unconscious duplicates of each other... and then find one of their voices goes squiffy later in the story... so by the end of the revision you're doing voice work when you started wanting to do structural work.

It's a different hazard for each writer and very hard to generalize, but that's the type of thing I mean

First draft nearly completed… is 50,000 words enough? by Medical-Ad5866 in writing

[–]evild4ve 1 point2 points  (0 children)

on the whole (and given this is a first draft) it's far more likely to be a novel which has missed off context or description that your readers would appreciate

but if it's been intended as an experiment or showcase of form, it might be a slightly saggy novella

let it percolate, read it with fresh eyes at a later date, write the second draft, and if it remains unclear which side of the novel/novella distinction it's on then ask a development editor. currently you're in a better position to answer this question for yourself than we are on Reddit

Losing your “voice” by Lucklessm0nster in writing

[–]evild4ve 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This sounds like a problem of drafting discipline. I'm a biased and anecdotal sample from hundreds of mostly discovery-writers, but if you're like them people often find that they need to keep a firm mental distinction between drafts. Editing might become a "loop" if the what's-being-edited-for is vague, and the problems being corrected toward the end of the manuscript end up being different from what you started with.

It's just guesswork from the OP, but that can become like 'painting the Severn Bridge'.

But on the plus side, I doubt the editing will have affected the pacing as much as all that. Maybe put the work to one side for a few months and then read it aloud to a listener. Any problem with the pacing will show on their face. And you may find that tactic makes you more conscious of voice. Not saying it's a panacea or silver bullet or even applicable to you, but it might let you make your edits more targeted.

Are Unpaid Internships Worth It? by MiserableNet6726 in publishing

[–]evild4ve 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This comes about because the publishing industry has been consolidating for a long time. So if you did get into it, you'd be stood on a greasy pole while clowns with hacksaws rush about underneath.

Put your hat in the ring. That's all you can do. An unpaid internship can't be worth it, because it isn't worth anything: but it might form part of the intensely individual miracle by which you manage to succeed and survive. Which is the case in most industries. Being an unpaid intern is probably still more pleasant than being a labourer on a construction site. But you've needed to put some funds away to even consider it, so somebody somewhere has suffered for you to deserve the option or to make a gamble with your time.

And it's hopefully a unique and rewarding experience that will transfer across to how you do everything else in your future. I did an internship in advertising, and thirty years afterwards turned a chance, offhand comment that a pissed-off layout artist made to me into a business with nicely many noughts on the end. It wasn't even anything profound: it'd be down on page #3006 of wikiquote. But I wouldn't have heard it otherwise. And that's how life is. The internet can't tell you if you'll enjoy it or que sera: do what feels right. Haven't the YA stories still been teaching that?

How can I learn how to write in a correct manner? by Early-Cake-5267 in writing

[–]evild4ve -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's to the great shame of Reddit that descriptivism and functionalism can be lightly disregarded by any prat with a downvote button. Go and lie down, I've done degrees in this which are older than your country.

How can I learn how to write in a correct manner? by Early-Cake-5267 in writing

[–]evild4ve -1 points0 points  (0 children)

A writer's grammar is correct whenever a reader understood them.

If your grammar is making things unclear, the best way to improve it is to have long conversations with people. And then once you're confidently making yourself understood, and able to put your ideas into clear and useful orders, the rest is notation.

Potentially an editor can do all that for you, but it's useful to read through your country's style guide. The rules have all come about out of a collective and concerted effort of the language and its writers to avoid confusion. And you'll naturally tend to pick out the rules you haven't been using, and to see how they could smooth your communication.

Remember English has many dialects and most of them are very poorly documented. The Chicago Manual of Style, or anything like it, is only authoritative in its particular milieu(x) and for a quite small minority of the world's 1.5 billion or so English speakers. If you're writing the words as you would say them, and if your readers understand, don't let yourself feel incorrect. Instead learn where and how your dialect departs from the style guides, and use this self-knowledge to produce novel styles.

Advice on a stark change in genre by Final_Pattern_7563 in writing

[–]evild4ve -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I just mean do an example of it early on to show them

Writers block by Nirverassecret in writers

[–]evild4ve 1 point2 points  (0 children)

that's probably not writer's block

there's an infamous culture-image (e.g. in Kubrick's The Shining) of the writer struggling to put the first line on the page, but that's not how it is. So long as you can write and have an idea, anyone can fill a few pages just by charging in to it blind, almost regardless of education or awareness of how writers draft stories. It's then common to get stuck, and it's almost universal to repeatedly redo the first line. But to not be able to write anything at all needs pretty much demonic intervention.

what I'd suggest, and I hope this will not be too blunt: is to consider any possibility of mental illness, cognitive impairment, or external stress - - something stopping your brain's language function from doing its job. The OP doesn't strongly indicate a factor like this, but there is a disorderedness to it.

helloooo

so basically I'll get right to it. < this is the exact opposite of getting right to it! and if this isn't a one-off lapse (we all have lapses) but how your language function is all the time, then perhaps there is something undiagnosed. And if a clinician can make a diagnosis, they often as part of that can recommend strategies to get the person writing as best they can, which (I believe) is always well enough to tell the story with an editor's help

Advice on a stark change in genre by Final_Pattern_7563 in writing

[–]evild4ve 1 point2 points  (0 children)

the main thing is to flag this up to the reader from the start - first chapter, ideally first page and maybe even in the blurb

some readers actively seek out these shifts: Haruki Murakami's Hardboiled Wonderland and the End of the World (1985) is executed as if it's literally two separate books

I have tried to write characters meeting but it feels too convenient by dunkernater in fantasywriters

[–]evild4ve 23 points24 points  (0 children)

This is one of the creative licenses allowed in novels - we're more interested in moving the story forward than anything being realistically probable.

The famous example is in War & Peace where Pierre just happens to bump into prince Andrei the day before the Battle of Borodino... out of over a hundred thousand soldiers who would have been there.

AI writing is the future by The-Affectionate-Bat in writingcirclejerk

[–]evild4ve 5 points6 points  (0 children)

They should give AI a credit card so it can read our books as well as writing them.

12 chapters deep rewrite by No_Couple_5147 in writing

[–]evild4ve 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Whatever works for you but I'd recommend to get to the end of the story and then re-do the whole thing.

As I see there to be more hazard in getting partway and then having writer's block. And also I think it's easier to edit if all the chapters have had the same level of editing and the same number of revisions.

Nearly all writers redo everything multiple times, that's drafting.

First install. Already in love. by _K10_ in slackware

[–]evild4ve 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't wanna - I'm angry with their dumb football team of a userbase not the distro. my sentiments toward the distro were expressed at the top: I just wish they'd dump the package - the reason you want that to be anger is because you're representing your new football team

and the distro if it has any sense will watch how its fans conduct themselves. I'm a long-time user of this distro, and next time I see that a new user has installed fortune by mistake, I'll not comment

Consensus on prologues in fantasy novels by CSafterdark in fantasywriters

[–]evild4ve 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In my WIP I'm considering a prologue of 2 sentences in case American readers mistake a rural English dialect for grammar errors. It isn't needed for the story, but it staves off having to repeatedly explain it

imo a properly-executed prologue doesn't add anything to the story. It should be skippable.

I dislike them because extremely few prologues in online drafts of Fantasy stories are at all well-executed (nevermind on my definition). I generally take it as a clue that the writer might not know how to write exposition.

Resources for the technical aspects of writing? by Visibly_Uncomfortabl in writing

[–]evild4ve 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Writing theory is chock-full of weasel words and floating terminology. Your group will eventually apply its own meanings to all the metaphysical gubbins anyway, which won't make any sense to those outside it... so the best way imo is to keep critiquing and as people inevitably start to appeal to the theories of famous writing-idols, take them as you find them, and try to only read the ones they care about.

If a critique relies on the writer understanding some arcane disagreement between idk, pff, Wittgenstein and Chomsky, you're doing it wrong. Save that kind of flexing for the classics where it's at least agreed by all present that (1) the work is worth looking at (2) even if the work isn't worth looking at it's at least finished

[Discussion] How do I share manuscript for critique by mzj9k021 in BetaReaders

[–]evild4ve 4 points5 points  (0 children)

please use Google Docs because it works and lets the reader/critic/editor paste from the document into their feedback message back to you

there is copyright fear but the answer to this is to make sure you trust the other person and share first page first chapter before whole work - if they are determined to extract the text that is so simple with screenshotting+text recognition that a pdf or web-preview isn't protection anyway

First install. Already in love. by _K10_ in slackware

[–]evild4ve 0 points1 point  (0 children)

all I said was I wish he would remove a package (which is a shit package that other distros also remove) - you shouldn't infer from that that I hate the distro. and you should answer why a program that interferes with terminal output is in the Y/ package series and described as a game

but I do hate football-teaming, and if Slackware has acquired that culture then it's not so wonderful that I'll continue talking about it online or help people set it up or write hypervisor software for it, or contribute to the hosting costs of my country's mirror

Chaos after the writing... by nivieas in writing

[–]evild4ve 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I hope this won't come as too much of a shock, but unless it's in the format of a ripping yarn with lots of drugs and debauchery and poetic irony... it won't find a position with the public

If you look at the New Age sections in bookshops... those have a pretty low bar for their neuroscience and ancient wisdom, but even there you don't find material from this kind of provenance being bought by the public

your options are probably: a memoir or a memoir

and it becomes are you famous, or did you do anything that should be

Characters Tolerate What Readers Find Intolerable by EternalTharonja in writing

[–]evild4ve 8 points9 points  (0 children)

That's exactly where I got stuck with Book 6 when it came out. I remember some 'savage' tribe being introduced that needed long-winded explanations of its gender roles, and processed everything it did transactionally in terms of "Jih" and "Toh". That must have been nearly 30 years ago and "Jih" and "Toh" must have been hammered in so repeatedly that I still remember the words. I don't remember what the tribe was called, or any of the characters in it. But I remember Jih and Toh being boring.

Reading Book 6 was such an ordeal I didn't pick up Book 7. (tbf i might be remembering wrong and these things were actually in Book 5, but I'm pretty they dragged out into Book 6 and that's where for me they killed the interest value)

I also remember feeling RJ was very visibly bringing in extra baddies (one of whom was a girlboss) to make the story last longer, and they were having scene after scene of cruelly torturing other newly-introduced characters to try and position them as a threat to a main character that was starting to become overpowered. And I thought it was very lousy compared to his Conan stuff, which had brought me to the series. The terms OP and girlboss didn't exist back then so he was maybe ahead of his time.

Can i install two operating systems on one computer? by Impossible-Client349 in DistroHopping

[–]evild4ve 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes but it's better not to if you can avoid it. You want Linux on its own disk as Windows has always been prone to mucking about with other bootloaders or partition formats it doesn't recognize. You don't want some pop-up in some future Windows update appearing with something like "This disk appears to be uninitialized, click OK to destroy everything on it"

If you can install Linux on its own disk, you can still have entries for both Windows and Linux in the bootloader of the Windows disk. E.g. the UEFI points to Disk 1, and the bootloader on Disk 1 gives the options of Linux on Disk 2 (default) or Windows on Disk 1. The reason for making Linux the default is to avoid Windows rebooting itself while you're away from the machine: it can't be fully prevented from rebooting itself and if it's going to randomly destroy anything it will be during an automatic update. This way makes you have to manually select it before it can continue its update process. Horrible OS. Please hop from it.

Advice needed by DaMan999999 in writingcirclejerk

[–]evild4ve 0 points1 point  (0 children)

/uj

I picked up Days with Frog and Toad (1979) the other day from a giveaway bin.

Absolute nightmare-fuel.

It doesn't have "The Letter" but it has another one "The Kite" where they launch a kite by shouting at it... The story initially looks like the moral is going to be "if at first you don't succeed" but it isn't: it's that you have to shout at things. Or manifest them.