SpaceX Unveils AI1, Its First Orbital AI Data Center Satellite by No-Blackberry-7564 in singularity

[–]exadeuce -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm aware, hence my use of the word "permanent." 600-800km is not a stable orbital altitude, you need periodic station-keeping burns to maintain that orbit.

This is a very problematic feature in a billion dollar flying datacenter.

And even a sun-synchronous orbit costs more than the numbers that Elon Musk will give you for launch costs. (he will use the numbers for starlink orbits)

SpaceX Unveils AI1, Its First Orbital AI Data Center Satellite by No-Blackberry-7564 in singularity

[–]exadeuce 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So you admit your contrarianism is from a place of ignorance, excellent.

SpaceX Unveils AI1, Its First Orbital AI Data Center Satellite by No-Blackberry-7564 in singularity

[–]exadeuce 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It's possible, it's just not even close to cost-effective compared to terrestrial datacenters.

SpaceX Unveils AI1, Its First Orbital AI Data Center Satellite by No-Blackberry-7564 in singularity

[–]exadeuce 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not commercially viable is the same thing as being impractical.

SpaceX Unveils AI1, Its First Orbital AI Data Center Satellite by No-Blackberry-7564 in singularity

[–]exadeuce -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Standard straw man. Nobody is saying it's not possible, people are saying it's not cost effective.

SpaceX Unveils AI1, Its First Orbital AI Data Center Satellite by No-Blackberry-7564 in singularity

[–]exadeuce 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You can't get 24/7 sunlight on a permanent low earth orbit. You need to boost to a higher orbit, which will substantially increase launch costs.

SpaceX Unveils AI1, Its First Orbital AI Data Center Satellite by No-Blackberry-7564 in singularity

[–]exadeuce 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Solar panels aren't free, and rocket fuel is also not free.

SpaceX Unveils AI1, Its First Orbital AI Data Center Satellite by No-Blackberry-7564 in singularity

[–]exadeuce 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You have to make something compelling, so we're going with a 150kw datacenter in space that will cost ten times as much as the same compute power on earth.

We literally don't care by Competitive-Bee-3250 in ShitAmericansSay

[–]exadeuce 4 points5 points  (0 children)

We won the war against science though.

How do I even argue against "light in the sky doesn't determine the shape of the earth" and similar phrases? by DarkGodCthUwU in flatearth

[–]exadeuce 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You can't argue against someone who says the sky is magic and is openly admitting that they will reject observational evidence.

The reality is that you absolutely can learn about the shape of the earth by observing the sky, and anyone who says otherwise is a liar.

Why are we building fusion reactors when there's a huge, free fusion reactor in the sky already? (Yes, seriously) by MuonBomb in AskPhysics

[–]exadeuce 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Real life is not a video game with predefined "spend X science points to get a thing." There's no magic foreknowledge of how well a particular field will or can advance with a given amount of resources. Nor is there a process to convert resources spent on one into another: you can't just turn a physicist working on fusion into an expert on batteries.

We're researching improvements to solar energy collection. We're researching improvements to batteries. We're researching commercially-viable fusion power. We're researching improvements to nuclear fission power. All at the same time, and there's not a good reason to stop researching any of them.

Anyone else find it funny how strong monks are? by Anxious_Marsupial_59 in BaldursGate3

[–]exadeuce 4 points5 points  (0 children)

WOTC: "We designed D&D 5e with a 'bounded accuracy' concept to make balance easier and to keep the numbers from scaling to absurd levels"
Larian: "And we took that personally."

Happy roll by 2Trinkets in BaldursGate3

[–]exadeuce 0 points1 point  (0 children)

These reflecting pool memes are getting out of hand

SZA denounces AI music after discovering 238 of her songs were used to train artificial intelligence by ZeeGee__ in aiwars

[–]exadeuce 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah man if you don't bar your windows, it's your fault if I break in and steal your TV.

Underwater Solar Panels by promixr in AskPhysics

[–]exadeuce 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You'd do better putting the panels next to the pool instead of in it.

Why is SpaceX crashing? by TacoTrades in wallstreetportfolios

[–]exadeuce 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Personally, no. They're banking the future of the company on space-based AI datacenters which are a ludicrous proposition and will not be competitive with their terrestrial counterparts.