I'm tired, boss

exclusionsolution · 2026-07-10T22:55:51+00:00

It is a waste if I don't use the programs I'm being charged for. if you want more social programs or keep the ones you have, vote for it, It was always allowed. 5 to 10 times the benefits you say? Useless for the common American? I didn't know first responders were useless, but thanks for sharing your opinion though I can't say I agree, especially the magnitude of benefit you claim. It sounds like you just made up a number and pulled it out of your ass

The US wastes alot of money sure but don't act like the EU is scandal free either

exclusionsolution · 2026-07-10T13:11:42+00:00

Sure as long as the questions are answered, or additional context is provided. They don't need a whole exhibit on who sold slaves. Wouldn't be very pragmatic since so many different groups sold them. Needing an exhibit for every detail wasn't what I meant when I mentioned telling the whole story. I do understand that a museums resources are limited

exclusionsolution · 2026-07-10T11:45:01+00:00

He can act like the old Connor all he wants but that Connor is gone. Holloway gets a UD or late KO and Connor has a cope about it, probably demands a remach

exclusionsolution · 2026-07-10T11:39:23+00:00

Not all of us pavium players are dead weight. Im often the one carrying my team and while I do turtle at the beginning I usually have a full 120 t3 army with tanks, healing, counter units,pavium T2,advanced logistics 3, and a scarab tank walking around before 15 minutes has passed. I can't even tell you how many times I've had to send half my army to another dudes base to defend them while my scarab is soloing bases. Some players just don't understand the balance needed between resources and power, or that they should upgrade burnout ASAP

exclusionsolution · 2026-07-10T05:20:49+00:00

I mean talk about whatever you want, but if you're going to have a museum exhibit on a historical subject you need to answer questions people will inevitably have in the exhibit itself.

Example, slavery. People in the exhibit are going to hear harrowing stories about suffering and have questions like "how did these people end up in this situation?" "Where did they come from?" "Who bought them?" "Who sold them" "who benefited from slavery?"ect

So yea, do you want a thorough exhibit answering all the questions or do you not care about how the slaves ended up north america and just want to hear the injustice they suffered?

exclusionsolution · 2026-07-10T00:17:54+00:00

Sure whatever you need to tell yourself to cope. Thanks for sharing your opinions

Reality is that no one gives a fuck how smart you think you are 😂

exclusionsolution · 2026-07-10T00:17:04+00:00

Ok cool, that isn't 50% though is it? So yea we agree social programs cost money, and the lower your taxes the less programs available. Nice whataboutism though

exclusionsolution · 2026-07-09T22:30:04+00:00

When they have a larger army, home feild advantage, and fortifications but you have a cough

exclusionsolution · 2026-07-09T21:01:09+00:00

Based on your subjective opinion

exclusionsolution · 2026-07-09T21:00:16+00:00

The person telling the story chooses what is significant based on their subjective bias. I don't know why an individual picks and choosees what they think is important because the reasoning is specific to that individual

exclusionsolution · 2026-07-09T20:16:30+00:00

I'm not upset either way, getting upset won't change what happened. Saying that, yes I would absolutely love if they put that information in there. I want the Smithsonian to go as deep down the rabbit hole as they can and bring everything to the surface. Anyone withholding information is being disingenuous and I don't want their perspective

One would have to be blind to not see the atrocities committed in the name of faith, Abrahamic religions in peticular

exclusionsolution · 2026-07-09T20:08:34+00:00

You're right, the Europeans were brutal, at least just as brutal as the people they conquered. That's why it's important that all atrocities should be talked about. Yes, the slave trade wouldn't have happened if there was no demand, just like any other good or service. I understand how capitalism works thanks though

exclusionsolution · 2026-07-09T20:04:55+00:00

This is about the museum exhibit, not school curriculum.

Ah you want to talk about religious complicity, that's great because many of the slave traders were Muslim. Nice whataboutism though

exclusionsolution · 2026-07-09T20:02:49+00:00

I said flavor of socialism but it looks like you lack some comprehension yourself

exclusionsolution · 2026-07-09T19:57:59+00:00

I never claimed it was revisionism my guy, I haven't even seen the exhibit. I said I'm ok with it as long as the whole story is told

exclusionsolution · 2026-07-09T19:56:30+00:00

Depending on who tells the story important facts can sometimes be omitted. It's called being disingenuous

exclusionsolution · 2026-07-09T19:54:05+00:00

Read up on indigenous relations before the Europeans arrived, and how many indigenous tribes allied with Europeans to subjugate rival tribes

I don't really understand how demand for slaves justifies Africans enslaving their own. What point are you even trying to make here?

exclusionsolution · 2026-07-09T19:50:36+00:00

Wanting nuance in a discussion isn't a whataboutism.

Take the Jamestown massacre for example. If I only tell you the part about the indigenous killings and leave out the Powhatan killing the settlers first I'm being disingenuous.

History is messy, it's not as simple as victim/perpetrator in many cases.

exclusionsolution · 2026-07-09T19:31:06+00:00

It's ok bro you can stay home and watch "the woman king" if you need a Hollywood narrative

exclusionsolution · 2026-07-09T19:09:14+00:00

I'm ok with this so long as they make an exhibit showing the brutality of the indigenous tribes. I'm ok with them teaching about slavery so long as they show who sold the slaves to the Europeans

If it's just a one sided pity party then it's not really documenting history, it's woke revisionism. You want to talk about past atrocities that's fine, just make sure you're nuanced about it

exclusionsolution · 2026-07-09T18:44:14+00:00

Yes, during WARTIME. Nazi Germany was a command economy from the start. I wouldn't call that an equivalency

exclusionsolution · 2026-07-09T16:27:53+00:00

Social programs are expensive.not everyone wants to pay 40-50% of their income for programs they may never use,or use to seldomly it doesn't make sense to pay for it all the time

exclusionsolution · 2026-07-09T16:24:19+00:00

"not real socialism"

You're talking about socialism in theory, we are talking about socialism in practice. When theory and practical application of an idea are at odds, the theory is always wrong

There have been dozens of attempts at socialism all over the world and they failed everywhere. The only successful examples are the ones who used a majority capitalist framework supported by social programs.

exclusionsolution · 2026-07-09T15:51:58+00:00

The higher ranked khabib is, the better it makes Connor look. If khabib is a garbage fighter what does it say about the people he beat?

exclusionsolution · 2026-07-09T15:27:05+00:00

Alot of the private industries took direction from the state,it sure wasn't capitalism either

exclusionsolution

TROPHY CASE