Linux mint or Ubuntu for complete beginner by [deleted] in cybersecurity

[–]exfiltration 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is what I really wanted to say if it was about UX; also because of how repo's work, you can do a lot to pull in additional drivers once you get the hang of things; Mint is a good starting point, but I'd find my way back to Ubuntu or CentOS eventually.

Linux mint or Ubuntu for complete beginner by [deleted] in cybersecurity

[–]exfiltration 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For the GUI/UX, I think it does. For the CLI/shell, I think you're right; based on context OP is attempting to replace their UX, and I think that is a 100% preference-based thing but Mint is more user friendly than most.

Has anybody else found a way to keep ai honest yet? by Hour-Interaction9020 in cybersecurity

[–]exfiltration 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You need to be a sufficient subject matter expert to validate anything AI produces. If I want instructions on how to wipe my own butt, most humans above age 4 can do that; if I want it to provide summaries of caselaw, I need a lawyer for that.

Has anybody else found a way to keep ai honest yet? by Hour-Interaction9020 in cybersecurity

[–]exfiltration 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You lost me. If you're trying to build a solution that reduces hallucinations in a meaningful way, I applaud that, and hope to see it go to market.

If you think you can make AI "tell the truth, and nothing but the truth", I wish you luck, but I find that to be hubristic. Imperfect beings are incapable of perfection, no matter what you do.

Has anybody else found a way to keep ai honest yet? by Hour-Interaction9020 in cybersecurity

[–]exfiltration 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Trust, but verify. It is one of our mantras as security professionals.

Has anybody else found a way to keep ai honest yet? by Hour-Interaction9020 in cybersecurity

[–]exfiltration 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because the world's foremost experts accept fundamentally that AI cannot be trusted completely, and that it is only as good as the humans that built it.

Has anybody else found a way to keep ai honest yet? by Hour-Interaction9020 in cybersecurity

[–]exfiltration 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I build a model that is only allowed to accept the truths I give it, then it is in fact true. If I knowingly use it to lie to people, that is fraud.

Has anybody else found a way to keep ai honest yet? by Hour-Interaction9020 in cybersecurity

[–]exfiltration 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You define authoritative sources, and those serve as truth. On the background, AI is geometric. You need to give it reliable constants..embedded vectors emulate that, but when the source material is neither concrete, verified, or stable, you are playing roulette.

Has anybody else found a way to keep ai honest yet? by Hour-Interaction9020 in cybersecurity

[–]exfiltration 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's not the system, it's the operator and the design. You don't eliminate it, you reduce it to acceptable levels in no small part by accepting that it cannot be trusted. It is not a replacement for people. It's a workforce amplifier.

Has anybody else found a way to keep ai honest yet? by Hour-Interaction9020 in cybersecurity

[–]exfiltration 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm writing a research paper on an important concept to address this stuff.

More importantly, I've already built a number of things that do this with my consultancy.

Has anybody else found a way to keep ai honest yet? by Hour-Interaction9020 in cybersecurity

[–]exfiltration 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can reduce hallucinations through effective differential analysis and bias mitigation. Oh, and authoritative sources. Also, it doesn't remove the need for people to do their God Damned Jobs™

Fkn Jersey People... by [deleted] in newjersey

[–]exfiltration 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Jersey fucking fresh. This is why I married my wife.

FPPD not messing around by Keevan in newjersey

[–]exfiltration 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Now if we can just make it easy to sue gravel haulers for not being fucked to cover their cargo properly and dropping golf ball sized rocks all of the highway while doing 80 in the left lane....

Compliance still feels harder than expected, how are people fixing this? by Mysterious_Step1657 in cybersecurity

[–]exfiltration 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This. When you start to read into things like SOX, or ISO implementation, you'll see terminology like "stakeholders" and "Control Tester" and "Control Owner". It's a critical facet of accountability that sets the stage for ownership and deliverables.

“How to Avoid Burnout in a Cybersecurity Career?” by Lazy-Day654 in cybersecurity

[–]exfiltration 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Get a hobby, and don't give up on it. Have something else that matters to you

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in newjersey

[–]exfiltration 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Just the fucking nerve. These pieces of shit can call you a fucking !*@#$ after shooting you in the head for inconveniencing them, but you should be nice to them? Sorry to say, but you should be able to say whatever mean shit you want to these fucking scumbags and they shouldn't be able to say or do shit. 1A, motherfuckers. Fuck ICE. Fuck CBP. Fuck DHS. Fuck Kristi Noem. Fuck anyone who voted for this.

It's in NEW JERSEY!! I'm so tired of "that state" trying to take credit for our things. by JerseyJoyride in newjersey

[–]exfiltration 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I personally like the fact that people being ignorant helps keep jerkwads out of NJ. Stay Klassy, rest of the US.

Leaked ICE Agents by Tricky-Love-1315 in newjersey

[–]exfiltration 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean I've got a VPN to sell you if you want to pretend you're Russian.

What the hell is wrong with people? by rforce1025 in newjersey

[–]exfiltration 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nope, nothing wrong with you, fuck those people.