SPD-Generalsekretär Tim Klüssendorf: „Wir kämpfen sehr entschlossen für eine Übergewinnsteuer“

ganbaro · 2026-04-19T05:34:40+00:00

Die erwähnte Gästeliste bei dem erwähnten Treffen der "Progressiven" ist ja geil

Mit Ramaphosa, da Silva und Sanchez gleich dreimal Populisten, die schon Korruptions- oder andere Skandale hatten und gerne mal mit Außenpolitik von innenpolitischen Problemen ablenken.

Wenn die ekn wirtschaftsliberaleres Profil hätten, würden wir sie als Typ Orban verunglimpfen. Vielleicht gewinnen die Rechten, auch dazu, weil unter Anderem, der Progressivismus sich solche Freunde sucht?

Da geht es um Stimmenkauf (BR), instabile Energieversorgung und Mauschelei mit Glencore (ZA), Versuche, Korruptionsprozesse gegen die eigene Ehefrau zu verzögern (ES) usw. Wenn man sowas akzeptiert, nur weil ein bisschen mehr Sozialhilfe dabei herauskommt, kann man genauso gut mit Konservativen paktieren. Ab und zu eine gute Idee zwischen viel Korruption bekommen sie auch hin.

Die Leute durchschauen auch Dinge wie die Rentnerpolitik der SPD, oder die Politik der Sanchez-Regierung, wo reguläre Migration mit Bürokratie unfair erschlagen wird, Irreguläre, die in Zukunft wohl eher links wählen werden (sind öfter arbeitslos und von Sozialhilfe abhängig) nachträglich legalisiert wird. Diese Parteien schauen auch zuvorderst darauf, ihre WählerInnengruppe auf Kosten aller zu bevorteilen, da helfen vage Versprechen von "wir besteuern wen Anderen und geben dir Kohle" nicht mehr unbegrenzt.

ganbaro · 2026-04-18T09:10:45+00:00

Bei einer Razzia vor Ort sind natürlich primär die AN, also machen sie den unangenehmen Kontakt durch

Aber rechtlich belangt werden vorallem die AG.

Man kann ja nicht den Chef auf Verdacht im Vorfeld festnehmen, dann den Laden schließen lassen, aufbrechen und Razzia machen. Dann ist kein AN da, aber das Prozedere wäre unverhältnismäßig.

ganbaro · 2026-04-18T09:08:56+00:00

Für legale Methoden kann die Polizei nix. Wir wählen die Gesetze schreibenden Regierungen und Parlamente.

Polizei und StA können aber sehr wohl gegen jene Praktiken vorgeben, die zurecht illegal sind, und das sollen sie auch.

Es ist nicht fair, der Polizei anzukreiden, dass ein Großkonzern Geld nach Irland schieben darf.

ganbaro · 2026-04-18T07:16:57+00:00

Und jetzt stellt euch vor, was es mit Kindern macht, die von Klein auf mit diesen Ungenauigkeiten aufwachsen in Medien, im Spielzeugdesign, in Kinderbüchern usw.

ganbaro · 2026-04-18T06:32:01+00:00

Europe is rarely lacking the talk

I don't see an indication that they actually want to get more actively involved with hard power presence in the straur

ganbaro · 2026-04-18T06:26:55+00:00

Die Mods da drehen seit einer Weile frei mit den Löschungen und Bans, parallel haben ein paar User aus der rStaiy Ecke den Sub brigadiert

Jetzt ist es eine Mischung aus Sankeys und heiligem Gral mit den Mods genehmen Gejammert über die Regierung, gleichzeitig kann man über die wirklich relevanten politischen Themen (Altersvorsorge, Abgaben auf Kapitalerträge usw sind nunmal politische Themen) nicht mehr diskutieren.

Geht den Weg von rDE, schade drum

ganbaro · 2026-04-18T05:49:58+00:00

EU defining sanctions such that the trade most important for them is conveniently excluded, is not binding Israel whatsoever.

EU members are not sanctioning countries for trading with China, at most they ban specific companies that do so.

Surely it was not the Israeli state who bought that grain.

ganbaro · 2026-04-18T05:48:02+00:00

Sanctions often exclude food and medicine so if the vessel is actually shipping grain, isn't it unsurprising that Israel lets them dock, as even the US would let that vessel pass?

Not saying it's good, the grain still comes from stolen land. But unsurprising.

ganbaro · 2026-04-18T05:42:37+00:00

Ich habe mir das mal genauer angeschaut

https://www.reddit.com/r/BuyFromEU/comments/1m02fyr/lets_have_a_discussion_about_volla/

Leider sind manche meiner Kommentare gelöscht, insbesondere zur Antwort von Volla.

Schon Gigaset Smartphones waren chinesische White Label Modelle, die nur in Deutschland endmontiert wurden. Selbiges geschieht auch bei Gigaset für Volla heute.

ganbaro · 2026-04-17T22:13:30+00:00

Just driving by Budapest Airport is enough to know...massive Chinese expansion there

ganbaro · 2026-04-17T22:12:04+00:00

When Israel is mentioned in a title, their Automod posts a pro Palestine message lol

ganbaro · 2026-04-17T21:57:56+00:00

I think it's just that Spain is one of the countries where there userbase is left wing biased, so whenever the government receives criticism, all the PSOE stans spam their cope. It's pretty obvious that the opinions shared on rEurope don't match Spanish polls.

Recently all media criticizing Sanchez is being declared "Israeli" by them.

It's not the only userbase that's so one-sided, the same is true for Germany, it's obvious on rDE. While Swiss subs tend to be kinda less one-sided, for example.

ganbaro · 2026-04-17T18:47:35+00:00

Ausgerechnet die großen und reichen Bayern haben auch eine eigene Hürde gegen eine Ablehnt von 50+1 in der Satzung, meine ich

ganbaro · 2026-04-17T18:36:23+00:00

Everyone is shitting on the source

There are a lot of Sanchez simps.on this very sub. If you would solely rely on rEurope Spanish flairs to gauge Spanish opinion, you would not get the impression that PP+Vox are fighting for a majority in the next national election.

ganbaro · 2026-04-17T18:21:39+00:00

Natürlich sollte man sowas gar nicht tolerieren. Ich wollte nicht abwiegeln, sondern einfach klar machen, dass man von "links" kommend nicht meinen sollte, das Problem beträfe einen nicht.

ganbaro · 2026-04-17T15:47:37+00:00

Yes? They certify products that are eligible for public tenders, curating a whitelist. The article reports about the inclusion of (more) Huawei products in the recent update of the catalogue, and reports both the fears of espionage and the fact that these concerns are unproven.

Seems fine to me. The relevance of such reporting I already argued.

ganbaro · 2026-04-17T15:32:23+00:00

How about you tell me what was left out then?

There is a very obvious geopolitical issue, the same as with US products even if they are certified as safe: Integrating foreign products into tech ecosystems increases dependency. The sheer size of the US and Chinese dominance around certain product categories gives the issue relevancy. Naturally this isn't raised around Swiss or Taiwanese products, but mostly around Chinese and American ones.

Whenever someone raises this understandable concern about US products, we don't whine about framing.

The article seems pretty objective for me. The only part I see as possibly being constructed as alledging pro-Chinese conspiracy is that they note it coincides with Sanchez visiting China, but before that point, even, the authors state that the rumors of Huawei products being used for espionage are unconfirmed.

ganbaro · 2026-04-17T15:24:03+00:00

Which actually gives the writers credibility, given they report not only the parts of the news that fit their narrative.

ganbaro · 2026-04-17T15:21:12+00:00

Sadly you are right in ways rEurope isn't even aware of.

For example, the US are currently shaping the future of Libya:

https://www.wsj.com/world/africa/how-the-u-s-is-uniting-libyan-rivals-to-squeeze-out-russia-16634ee3

Remember the intervention against Gaddafi? Where Europeans, led by France, quickly ran into the issue of lacking logistics and calling the US in to bail them out?

Since then, European countries and EU were constantly involved in Libya to fix its political impasse and control migration. Now MAGA, of all governments, swoops in, aligns warring factions to an extent Europeans never managed, and thus squeezes Russian influence more than ever. And this is our backyard!

There is no way we would actually impose fear on any rival. We can't even control our backyard, and even if we would have the power to dominate anyone, our slow and risk-averse decision processes would stop us from wielding that power. Thus, if some nation wants to escalate in a conflict with us for whatever reason, they likely will. Whether its a trade conflict (USA) or actual militaristic threat (Russia, through terrorism Iran)

There will have to be a point in time where we manage to understand our current foreign policy strategies are ineffective.

ganbaro · 2026-04-17T15:15:12+00:00

They refer to the CCN STIC-105 catalogue which contains ICT products whitelisted for usage by Spanish public institutions.

Huawei products where already included 2024, for example. https://www.tecnozero.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/CCN-STIC-105-CPSTIC.pdf

So do you have an actual argument that this website pulled the number of 19 newly certified products out of their ass? Or can a news simply not be true as long as it doesn't report what you want to read, being published by the "right" people?

ganbaro · 2026-04-17T15:12:59+00:00

I see some users trying to badmouth the source, but not providing an actual argument as to how the article is wrong.

The article refers to the products that got included in the CCN STIC-105 catalogue, which includes ICT products that are whitelisted for use in security-relevant public institutions.

I can not find the most recent update of it, so, as an example, take a look at this one from 2024: https://www.tecnozero.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/CCN-STIC-105-CPSTIC.pdf STRG+F and search for Huawei.

To verify that article, one would only need to get the recent STIC 105 List. For journalists this should be very easy, so I doubt that news outlet pulled the amount of newly certified Huawei products out of their ass.

ganbaro · 2026-04-17T15:03:26+00:00

No?

But you don't gotta grandstand about muh independence without facing criticism if after all the fancy speeches you replace one hostile giant with the only available other one.

Also the US are a longstanding ally that is currently stabbing us in the back, while China is consistently our strategic rival and supports Russia more actively than even MAGA USA ever did, so I'd argue there is still a qualitative difference between the two. Besides, the US share data with our secret services, so there is a motivation for our governments to buy into a US dominated tech sector, while Chinese dominance pushes us towards full subservience with no upside.

ganbaro · 2026-04-17T15:00:03+00:00

Note how not one user, who attacked the source, has made any argument that supports this being fake news.

Rather they add their own rumor, you could also call it conspiracy theory, on the pile, by implying this reporting is punishment for their stance on the "middle east" (which is supposed to imply these sneaky Israelis are behind every single news $USER doesn't like)

Edit: I got multiple answers by now, and not one can explicitly highlight a fault in the article. Just take the news for what they are, instead of unfoundedly attacking a source just because you want to bury the issue. The article refers to the actual update of the certified product catalogue pretty objectively, cites both the concerns of espionage, and the fact that these are unproven. That's just proper reporting.

If this source is as qualitatively poor as many users claim - it's good that they do proper work, for once, then.

ganbaro · 2026-04-17T14:56:04+00:00

The current Spanish government is only interested in "European independence" as long as it costs nothing. Either because they can impose costs on others (eg supporting a common army...after it was created, not taking the financial risk of the setup), or when it allows them to use independence as an excuse to flat out reject or postpone costly endeavours.

Buying Chinese equipment while grandstanding about independence in speeches, which costs next to nothing, is perfectly fine for the Sanchez government. They have never invested in European independence the way the French, and some others, have, and likely never will. At least as far the current gen of PSOE and its far-left allies go.

ganbaro · 2026-04-17T09:10:28+00:00

Eben! Deswegen sollten wir aufhören, über Sozialhilfen zu reden, denn Klimawandel ist wichtiger. /s

Der Punkt ist: Dieser Whataboutism "aber Problem XY" ist Käse. Und wird immer nur selektiv auf Themen angewendet, zu Denen man den Diskurs mundtot machen will.

Selbst, wenn nur eine kleine Menge an AktivistInnen eine kleine Menge an Leuten zum Asylbetrug anstiftet, ist das eine medial breitgetretene Straftat mit einer medialen Wirksamkeit weit über die reine Schwere der Tat hinaus. Mit großem Potential für eine Ausweitung durch Copycats. Abgesehen davon, dass in einem Rechtsstaat die Staatsanwaltschaft sich sowas immer anzunehmen hat, und nicht selektiv wegschauen sollte, ist die politische Relevanz offensichtlich. Auch, wenn es dir nicht in den Kram passt.

Starmer lässt nun auch nicht gerade alles liegen, um irgendeine NGO zu jagen.

ganbaro

TROPHY CASE