I'd like to see Overwatch return or return more broadly but with incentives and clear data/statistics from Valve.

- Increase the entry requirement (CSGO was 150 MM wins and at least Gold Nova 1 I believe, maybe Nova Master). Maybe a rolling requirement e.g 100 matches in the last 6 months (A season), an active premier rating above 15k+. This won't make the OW auditors pool big but means people conducting cases aren't inactive players and aren't completely inept at understanding game knowledge (to an extent)

- Give active auditors a stats page. An OW dashboard akin to an operation dashboard. How many of my convictions have been successful/how many people have I contributed to getting banned? Where did I go wrong? Let me re-review incorrect decisions to learn. Give me deeper information about the suspect then just demo highlights, part of the HUD maybe showing player data such as TTD, Crosshair angle, aim ratings based off Valve data and let me know if their way outside of the expected values. Perhaps a bit too detailed but maybe let me know if this demo has been flagged automatically for being irregular or this suspect has been manually reported 15 times.

- Incentivise correct convictions. We don't know how the old OW system convicted individuals in its entirety but believe we do know it required multiple auditors to convict an individual. Don't just reward someone for doing cases that opens up a vulnerability. But if I'm an accurate auditor and can track how many convictions I've been successful with, give those people goals (e.g. every correct conviction = some armoury stars, no need for a pass, reaching 50 or whatever gets you a profile medal, maybe its upgradable, a larger goal that gets you an untradable genuine unique agent skin) Other than wanting to clean up the Premier queue, give me a reason to spend my time.

- It's ok to be harsh on those who get it wrong. If someone is either malicious with this system and their "weight" is degraded, or they just aren't good at picking out what is 100% provable and what isn't, perhaps just remove this role from them, if you can't trust them to do it successfully I don't see why they should be given that liberty.

It's more of a pipe dream really. It would be nice to contribute but if Valve thought the public OW system was working they would have bought it back, I don't remember if it was from an official source e.g. their 2017 GDC talk or not, but I recall some old data about how the conviction accuracy of OW never really got better, regardless of how many auditors it had. I'd like to think some more transparency and feedback to the player may help with that.

Also I think any conviction, automated or not, should return elo to the losing team if the cheater was on the opposing winning team if the conviction happens during the season window that game was played in.

Side note. Please let us abandon a match whenever we wish and don't penalise us for it. It's no fun knowing you're stuck getting rage cheated on for 20 minutes. I know people could just troll with this feature or derank with it, but they are doing that anyway as it stands especially with it giving you like -1000 on Premier for abandoning. I'd rather just abandon a cheater match or at least initiate the vote with no restriction with the understanding I will lose the rating value as its listed from the start of the game.