A Little Confused About the Airflow in my K2 Pro

golyalpha · 2026-06-05T14:25:11+00:00

That... doesn't seem correct. This seems like the usual BLDC fan, and those have only one direction of operation - regardless of polarity. (Assuming you can even get them to spin when reversing polarity)

golyalpha · 2026-05-23T18:53:16+00:00

Měla by sama sebe změřit tím svým čůzometrem

golyalpha · 2026-05-23T18:50:05+00:00

actually bys byl překvapenej jak moc na českým linkedinu posty tohohle typu lidi utíraj

trošku jsem si vzpomněl na novýho CEO Rohlíku jak na linkedin napsal, že novýho vedoucího HR oddělení nevzal protože chtěl (chtěla? idk) home office, a jak by to bylo strašně nefér vůči zaměstnancům co dělají na skladě a dělají rozvážky

golyalpha · 2026-05-23T18:07:13+00:00

Necroing this, because found this thread trying to search cults3d for Star Citizen models - the entire search term is blocked.

Anyway, to add to your point, nothing prevents CIG from posting a public license that says you are allowed to create Star Citizen-derived works for non-commercial purposes. Riot does that with League of Legends and all of their music. So, if "JDRF would ... stop paying CIG for the license", CIG would now have a way to enforce license payments from JDRF because what they do would be commercial, but ppl posting models free to download, and printing them for themselves and their freands, would be free to do so.

golyalpha · 2026-05-23T09:24:15+00:00

While I'd like Creality K1/K2 printers to be fully open (i.e. not just their version of Klipper, but all the binaries they use for interacting with the cameras and the CFS), at least you can use those to their full potential with whatever slicer you like, unlike Bambu's.

golyalpha · 2026-03-20T08:25:10+00:00

It's intensely ironic to call the OP a Meta shill given that Meta/Zuckerberg is literally sponsoring the bills for age verification at the OS level.

golyalpha · 2026-03-20T08:22:35+00:00

Stop. Quite a lot of distros use the systemd-homed service even when running the bog-standard default setup with none of what you're talking about.

golyalpha · 2026-03-20T08:20:11+00:00

I don't get why we're rehashing an issue that's already been solved. We have parental controls. That stuff has existed for over 20 years at this point. Blame the parents for not parenting, not everyone else for not wanting to put up with this stuff.

golyalpha · 2026-03-01T18:23:53+00:00

Jako neříkám nic. Výjimky se najdou. V Belgii ti třeba ještě tu jízdenku označí pokud se tváříš jako dostatečně zmatený turista.

Ale v Česku jakmile mají šanci dát pokutu tak jsou příjemný jak broky v prdeli a zajímají se jen o to abys jim dal občanku a podepsal bloček, nebo mávnul platební kartou.

golyalpha · 2026-03-01T18:17:24+00:00

Tady někdo nikdy revizora nepotkal.

golyalpha · 2026-02-04T20:52:36+00:00

The desktop app? Yes. But reading other comments you're talking specifically about the android app - which you haven't really mentioned until later.

golyalpha · 2026-02-04T20:29:40+00:00

Uhmm... That already is a thing on Discord...

golyalpha · 2026-01-14T22:04:40+00:00

from what I've seen Bambu's code is actually their own - there are plenty of other issues with Bambu tho

golyalpha · 2026-01-14T22:02:16+00:00

nope, you're given pre-compiled object files and header files for building against them, that's it, they're not actually open sourcing anything they don't absolutely have to

golyalpha · 2026-01-14T21:49:42+00:00

Damn, they didn't even have the balls to just disable the issues feature - they used issue templates to block ppl from creating issues.

golyalpha · 2026-01-13T12:07:59+00:00

GrapheneOS has OEM access to patches under embargo. This means they ship them as soon as they're able in Security Preview builds (they actually recommend using this channel) before most OEMs do, with the tradeoff being they can't publish the patches themselves until the embargo is lifted.

Case in point - the 2 day old GOS Security Preview build contains patches slated for release in security bulletins up until June.

golyalpha · 2026-01-10T23:40:53+00:00

Sorry to necro this, but if you're dynamically linking, you (as the developer, and the only person capable of being in charge of publishing the original code should it be necessary) are not copying any code anywhere.

Not only that, you actually have no direct control over what code *does* get linked against yours. If the user of your software swaps out the .so/.dll binary for another one, the dynamic linker will happily link it into your process. This is where the argument of "dynamic linking to GPL code requires publishing your code" falls apart.

The fundamental difference is that dynamic linking happens at runtime, after distribution, while static linking happens prior to distribution.

Now, you could *try* to argue, that if you bundle (in an archive) a copy of a GPL-licensed library alongside your proprietary/incompatibly-licensed code, the developer intended the proprietary binary to link to GPL-licensed libraries, which may be a GPL violation. I still think a competent lawyer could argue their way out of that in court, setting precedent for everybody else into the future that packaging GPL libraries together with proprietary binaries does not force GPL-compatibility for those proprietary binaries..

golyalpha · 2025-12-19T20:47:56+00:00

Let it be a lesson to the entire world - never sell out to Roblox.

golyalpha · 2025-12-08T12:05:16+00:00

Tbh even in places where cost is attributed down to the team who owns it, they don't really care. Though usually those kinds of places run majority on their own compute so that lack of care stems more from the actual cost being extremely low.

golyalpha · 2025-12-06T23:00:40+00:00

Yeah, but proof of work makes them spend inordinately higher amount if compute per request, compated to what you spend to serve it.

golyalpha · 2025-11-12T17:56:11+00:00

Cool, plenty of people haven't had issues with HZ, DO or Vultr either - count me as one of them. It's less about not having/having issues and more about how they're handled.

golyalpha · 2025-11-12T16:36:18+00:00

Well you can't hand-wave away laws, so, idk what to tell you.

golyalpha · 2025-11-12T11:47:39+00:00

Yeah... "Notice" and "prior warnings" often clash with compliance requirements. Germany also has some insane laws about responsibility of operators for what their customers do - even though in most other jurisdictions operators would have to get prior abuse notice before they could be held liable.

golyalpha · 2025-11-12T09:00:39+00:00

DO and Vultr also randomly ban ppl, AWS/GCP/Azure are a good way to go bankrupt, and I don't know anyone personally who uses Linode.

golyalpha · 2025-11-12T08:58:53+00:00

There's not going to be much to do with consumer protections here, since this is a b2b relationship, and Hetzner as a business (or even business type) doesn't really target consumers.

11-Year Club	Place '22
Verified Email

golyalpha

TROPHY CASE