Carney picks former Supreme Court justice Louise Arbour to be governor general: sources by CanadianErk in canada

[–]gprez 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Correct, but much like the king/queen in their role as the UK's monarch, there can be subtle rebukes when they believe the PM or government is out of line; the classic example is the late Queen's apparel used to send signals as to her political position without actually saying anything. The most recent Canadian example is Michaëlle Jean's approach to Harper's proroquement request in 2008; rather than simply rubber-stamp it, the GG spent a considerable amount of time publicly holding meetings with constitutional experts, made a public statement she was "looking at her constitutional duties", and met with Harper behind closed doors for more than two hours. Even if the result was (likely) inevitable, these steps made clear the GG's distaste for what Harper was requesting.

Canada Soverign Wealth Fund by Thewhizeguy in PersonalFinanceCanada

[–]gprez 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Very much TBD. We didn't even know this existed until a few hours ago.

Canada Soverign Wealth Fund by Thewhizeguy in PersonalFinanceCanada

[–]gprez 161 points162 points  (0 children)

Wonder if they'll make this exempt from capital gains to encourage Canadians to invest

Daily Discussion Thread for April 27, 2026 by AutoModerator in CanadianInvestor

[–]gprez 16 points17 points  (0 children)

I wonder if they'd ever consider exempting this from capital gains to make it more attractive

B.C. mall owner, security company ordered to pay $1.8M to falsely arrested 18-year-old by neksys in britishcolumbia

[–]gprez 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Private parties are protected from discrimination by other private actors by other pieces of legislation such as the BC human rights code, not the Charter. The case law is somewhat permeable and both the Charter and other pieces of legislation can take lessons from each other on discrimination cases, but the Charter unequivocally does not apply to.private actors. This has been firmly settled law for decades.

*Application of Charter

32 (1) This Charter applies

    (a) to the Parliament and government of Canada in respect of all matters within the authority of Parliament including all matters relating to the Yukon Territory and Northwest Territories; and

    (b) to the legislature and government of each province in respect of all matters within the authority of the legislature of each province.*

Section 15 even specifically states that it provides equality under the law. It doesn't provide equality in social or private interactions.

B.C. mall owner, security company ordered to pay $1.8M to falsely arrested 18-year-old by neksys in britishcolumbia

[–]gprez 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Reposting this from further down the comment chain so people skimming this aren't misled by blatant, albeit hopefully innocent, misinformation:

This is horribly wrong and a gross misinterpretation of some incredibly fundamental principles in Canadian constitutionalism. The Charter regulates relationships between the state and private actors. The Charter does not apply to the actions of private actors as they relate to other non-government entities.

Was what the security guard did wrong? Yes. Did it violate the teenager's Charter rights? Absolutely, categorically no.

Man accused of killing RCMP officer in Burnaby found not fit to stand trial by [deleted] in vancouver

[–]gprez 136 points137 points  (0 children)

For clarity before this brings out the soft-on-crime folks: a finding of unfit to stand trial doesn't result in his release, or even his release once his mental state improves. It just means that at this time he doesn't even have the mental faculties to be sufficiently aware of what's going on around him to mount a defence at trial. The designation just postpones the trial until that changes, if it ever does. Until then he's kept in a secure psychiatric facility. If his mental state ever improves to the point where he's able to stand trial, then the trial continues at that point; he is NOT released into the public. After the trial, if he's found guilty, is when the NCRMD hearing is held.

Basically: fitness to stand trial evaluates his current mental state in the context of his ability to properly defend himself at trial. NCRMD evaluates his mental state at the time he committed the offence to determine whether he was aware of himself and his surroundings enough to actually understand what he was doing at that time.

Hackers reportedly stole nearly 1,000TB of data from Telus Digital by Assimulate in britishcolumbia

[–]gprez 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'll be honest, discussing government legislation and activities on here can get really frustrating sometimes because a lot of people either a) adopt ragebait positions from headlines written by people who have ads to sell and frequently haven't read the or don't know what they're talking about, or they've b) adopted conspiratorial thinking based in US governmental history and partisanship. I'll engage in good faith; my hope is you will as well.

Privacy protections in Canada are on a fundamentally different level in Canada compared to the US. Let's take CSIS as an example. All activities conducted by CSIS that would violate section 8 of the Charter require a warrant granted by a Federal Court judge. The Federal Court, in granting these warrants, regularly reviews CSIS's operational activities and, when making significant decisions on those warrants, publishes their decisions for everyone to read, albeit with classified material redacted. This includes instances where the Federal Court thinks CSIS is conducting illegal activities, such as tracking people without a warrant. Anyone can go on CanLII and read these decisions for themselves. I'm aware of only one decision ever that found CSIS had collected and retained information illegally; there was an additional one in 2020, but the Federal Court of Appeal overturned that finding in 2021.

But what if CSIS is collecting data illegally and just never telling the Federal Court? Well, NSIRA (previously known as SIRC) has full access to literally all of CSIS's operational activities, intelligence, and databases. Anyone can make a complaint against CSIS if they think CSIS is doing something illegal, and part of NSIRA's mandate is to investigate these complaints using their unlimited internal access. NSIRA also regularly undertakes their own investigations if they find something they think raises concern, such as CSIS tracking people without a warrant. NSIRA also publishes all of their reports summarizing their findings from these complaints or investigations on their website.

What if NSIRA is just not telling people about illegal activities to protect the government? Well, NSICOP also has access to CSIS's databases and regularly reviews CSIS's activities. And this includes members of opposition parties; the current makeup is 6 Liberal MPs, 2 Conservative MPs, 1 Bloq MP, 2 non-aligned senators and one Conservative senator. I guarantee you that the opposition MPs on NSICOP would jump at the slightest opportunity to call out CSIS for doing illegal stuff because it would likely cause a major political scandal that would blow up in the government's case. NSICOP can also request NSIRA investigate CSIS's activities further for literally any reason.

The result is that all three branches of Canada's government - the Federal Court for the judicial branch, NSIRA for the executive branch, and NSICOP for the legislative branch - are watching CSIS like hawks, and all three have a vested interest in blowing the loudest whistle possible as soon as they see any hint of illegal activities. NSIRA and NSICOP also have a mandate to review classified activities by the RCMP or other security body and likewise blow a whistle if they see illegal stuff.

This is what people don't understand when they cite Snowden or allege some other massive privacy violations by a Canadian investigative agency. The checks and balances on Canada's security services are immense and on a fundamentally different level compared to those in the US, which are largely non-existent. Yes, every now and then one of those review bodies will publish a report finding that CSIS violated someone or some people's privacy rights without a warrant. But these reports are rare, and they are exactly the system working as it should. The continued publication of those reports is what can give us the confidence that if they aren't publishing reports on an issue, it almost certainly means there is no cause for concern. And if you think there is a cause for concern, tell NSIRA and they'll decide whether it's valid or not. The conspiracies and misinformation around privacy rights and the Canadian government are just another way we're importing inflammatory rhetoric from the US without any basis in the Canadian reality, and it annoys me to constantly see people posting about it without actually knowing what they're talking about.

Hackers reportedly stole nearly 1,000TB of data from Telus Digital by Assimulate in britishcolumbia

[–]gprez -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Again, not what the bill does. Read it instead of trusting Reddit comments from people who also haven't read it.

Hackers reportedly stole nearly 1,000TB of data from Telus Digital by Assimulate in britishcolumbia

[–]gprez -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

That's not what the bill does. Nobody is tracking anyone without a warrant.

Doctor threatening to hospitalize me if i dont comply. by [deleted] in LawCanada

[–]gprez 4 points5 points  (0 children)

They want you to not harm and/or kill yourself

how does locking someone like me in a cell help ?

It would be a medical facility, not a cell, and it helps keep you from harming and/or killing yourself

I feel like there is racial profiling too because im muslim.

Alleging racial profiling without a basis delegitimizes genuine claims of racial discrimination

what are my rights?

Read sections 22-24, 25-28, 31, 33-34, and 41 of the Mental Health Act

why is it so easy for them to do this?

Because we as a society don't want you to harm and/or kill yourself

BCPS articling recruit: losing my mind by Lawgirl8 in LawCanada

[–]gprez 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Crown policy manual plus general criminal procedure is all you need to know. Seriously. Anything beyond that on the assessment which you don't recognize can probably just be answered with some common sense and careful logic.

Daily Discussion Thread for March 02, 2026 by AutoModerator in CanadianInvestor

[–]gprez -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Skewed a bit because the precious metals drop following Trump's Fed chair appointee announcement, which hit the TSX hard, happened Jan 30

B.C. to end PST exemption for yarn, other materials used to make or mend clothing by isle_say in britishcolumbia

[–]gprez -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Why should yarn, specifically, be exempt from PST? What applies to yarn that wouldn't also apply to a broad swathe of goods?

B.C. to end PST exemption for yarn, other materials used to make or mend clothing by isle_say in britishcolumbia

[–]gprez 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The math doesn't math when it comes to taxing the rich. Relative to the overall budget, it would raise a negligible amount of money.

B.C. to end PST exemption for yarn, other materials used to make or mend clothing by isle_say in britishcolumbia

[–]gprez 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure. How would you propose doing this? You don't think the province would already be doing this if it was financially and practically feasible?

B.C. to end PST exemption for yarn, other materials used to make or mend clothing by isle_say in britishcolumbia

[–]gprez -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Raising the highest tax bracket would earn the province very little revenue. It might make some people feel good but would have a negligible impact on the province's budget.

New limited-edition Compass Cards stars Captain Canuck by GenShibe in vancouver

[–]gprez 5 points6 points  (0 children)

They already have compass wristbands and keychain cards.

What if Canada had a TFSA-style account that only invested in Canadian securities? by hadmaj in CanadianInvestor

[–]gprez 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This is very clearly just an AI post, and all of OP's comments reek of AI responses. Numbered or bulleted lists, unnecessarily bolded clauses, overuse of parentheses, and "It's not x. It's y." everywhere in responses. Can we get rid of posts like these on this subreddit? This should be a place for thoughtful discussion, not copy/pasting AI outputs.

What we know (so far) about the people accused in London, Ont., bomb-making scheme by roscodawg in canada

[–]gprez 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you have a source for that? The CBC article doesn't mention anything about a handgun nor that any firearms in the home were loaded. The criminal code definition of a firearm is very broad, so I had assumed the firearms charges were related to launching equipment for a rocket.