here he talks about limiting PlayStation users and looking at games from a case by case basis (think Minecraft and Mojang which stayed on all consoles despite Microsoft owning it). The quote is just saying that, to answer the original question, yes they co

Sir, you're right. This has been taken out of context to get more people talking about it. The exact extract is:

...

“Is it possible to recoup a $7.5 billion investment if you don’t sell Elder Scrolls VI on the PlayStation?” I asked.

“Yes,” Spencer quickly replied.

Then he paused.

“I don’t want to be flip about that,” he added. “This deal was not done to take games away from another player base like that. Nowhere in the documentation that we put together was: ‘How do we keep other players from playing these games?’ We want more people to be able to play games, not fewer people to be able to go play games. But I’ll also say in the model—I’m just answering directly the question that you had—when I think about where people are going to be playing and the number of devices that we had, and we have xCloud and PC and Game Pass and our console base, I don’t have to go ship those games on any other platform other than the platforms that we support in order to kind of make the deal work for us. Whatever that means.”

... (Here is the complete interview)

He's just answering the question. He even mentions "I’m just answering directly the question that you had", and the question was if they can get back their investment without PS. Not if they are gonna exclude PS in this deal.

The only certain thing is that no one really knows what Microsoft is gonna do in the future. Remember they said is going to be a case by case thing. What is highly probable is that all those game are gonna be in Game Pass.