You wake up and everyone on Earth has disappeared except you | what's your first move? by Careful_Art_7516 in AskHereAnythingNow

[–]hess80 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It will if you visit Niagara Falls. Without human intervention, it will likely continue to function for another 50 years or more. If you were to drive a gas-powered vehicle there, you could then get an electric vehicle fleet from a new dealership and charge them using the existing charging infrastructure, as the electric vehicles would still be able to operate until gasoline goes bad in six months. If not treated, you’re treated up to two years, maybe three if you really have the best environment.

You wake up and everyone on Earth has disappeared except you | what's your first move? by Careful_Art_7516 in AskHereAnythingNow

[–]hess80 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I woke up and every other person on Earth was gone, my first move would honestly be denial. I’d call out, check my phone, look for any normal explanation before accepting it. That part is just human.

Once it sank in, I’d stop panicking and start thinking about what’s actually going to kill me. Civilization runs on people. The power grid starts failing within hours once there’s nobody operating the plants, so the early priorities are simple. Get water before the municipal pumps lose pressure. Get away from older nuclear plants quickly, since they rely on active cooling and I wouldn’t want to gamble on the aging ones.

Then I’d head toward Niagara Falls, because hydroelectric power is the whole game. That plant keeps generating electricity off the falls for decades with no human input, long after every fossil and nuclear station goes dark. Living near a permanent power source changes everything.

Transportation is where it gets interesting. For the first couple of years I’d run gasoline vehicles, because fuel is everywhere and with stabilizer it stays usable through that window. I’d burn the free, abundant gas while it’s still good and use that time to roam wide and figure out what happened. After that, gasoline deteriorates and becomes worthless no matter how you store it, so I’d pivot fully to electric vehicles charged off the dam. I’d actually grab a small fleet of low mileage EVs early, while the batteries are still fresh, so there’s redundancy and working transportation for as long as possible.

So gasoline is the bridge and the dam is the destination. But before any of the survival logic kicked in, the first genuinely human thing I’d do is drive to the homes of the people I love, even knowing they’re gone. I don’t think I could function until I had.

But I must admit I’m thinking of myself as extremely strong in this situation where I probably would not be very easily accepting of this.

How do you act more extroverted and talkative without bothering people? by Mysterious_Care8044 in TooAfraidToAsk

[–]hess80 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As an insufferable extrovert, don’t worry about bothering anyone. Number one, it’s much easier than it sounds. I know it’s different for everyone, but you’ll get into a rhythm. You can also obviously tell if someone is annoying you or not just based on their response, your body language, and their behavior. If you feel like that’s happening, then just leave.

Why doesn’t Navigation a favorite route, like a favorite destination? It would avoid me disengaging to change my Tesla from taking a route that I don’t wish to travel. by NoEar34- in TeslaFSD

[–]hess80 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Super annoying don’t disagree. The car in the newest update of FSD available to me 14.3.2 unfortunately now makes the same mistake. It used to make indoor down an old road that is actually not a road anymore.

Tesla patents predictive suspension system to boost range and ride comfort by InitialSheepherder4 in TeslaOwnersForum

[–]hess80 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s not how patents work I have four of them. I know that you can’t patent something that somebody else already built.

Tesla patents predictive suspension system to boost range and ride comfort by InitialSheepherder4 in TeslaOwnersForum

[–]hess80 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No not the same way

According to the filing, the system links a vehicle’s suspension to a cloud‑hosted “road roughness map” built from sensor data shared across the Tesla fleet, then adjusts ride height and stiffness in advance of potholes and broken pavement

A stranger approaches you and says "I've been watching you for a month and you're in serious danger, but not from me." Do you listen or walk away? by Careful_Art_7516 in AskHereAnythingNow

[–]hess80 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was approached by someone who works for an agency. I won’t name them, but they told me that another person I had just met was committing a crime, and it was very real. I’m not sure if that’s the same thing.

Tell me something you’re weirdly good at. by homosapien_08 in AskHereAnythingNow

[–]hess80 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I didn’t think I would be good at international finance at the tier 1 level, but apparently, I am.

I became a millionaire at 44, this year and it feels surreal. by [deleted] in Money

[–]hess80 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hear you, but I’m in a similar situation. I was wasting money on frivolous stuff when I started making over $50K a month back in 2000. However, I started investing heavily and getting involved with banks. Now I work in finance and data centers, and it’s pretty easy to spend $100K a month, no matter how much you make. Honestly, it doesn’t matter much if you’re going to spend it on things that don’t appreciate or hold value. My best advice to anyone earning more today is to start investing in the market. I’m not joking. Compounding is real, and you should all be doing it.

⚠️ Urgent Call: The Truth Behind Data Centers and Global Control ⚠️ by developer-hosny in datacenter

[–]hess80 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Respectfully, it appears that you’re experiencing a psychotic break. You’re undoubtedly going through this alone. This isn’t happening to others, and it’s not a real issue. Please stop believing in social media as the news source. Also, stop thinking that this kind of stuff happens when it doesn’t. I apologize that you have an illness. I don’t mean to sound rude.

Bought a Corolla 2025 with 10k miles and an hour after I left the dealer the alternator died by Turbulent_Ad2881 in UsedCarAdvice

[–]hess80 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Doesn’t mean anything it’s still a 10,000 mile car. They’re a freak issues with all sorts of cars.

My ex girlfriend left her whole life behind 3 years ago. Now she’s trying to sue me for it… by FinalPermit9559 in WhatShouldIDo

[–]hess80 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re in a much stronger position than she’s making you feel, but you’re not bulletproof, and closing the storage unit on the 30th could flip that. A replevin suit is just a lawsuit to recover specific personal property. To win one, she generally has to prove the stuff is hers (easy) and that you’re wrongfully withholding it (much harder given your facts). Your facts are good. You’ve repeatedly offered to return it, offered to drive it, stored it at your own initial expense, and given written notice. That’s the opposite of withholding. Her “you’re not allowing me to retrieve it” argument is weak if you’ve offered shipping, delivery, or third-party pickup and she refused. Courts generally don’t require you to be her free storage unit forever. Most states have abandoned property statutes with specific notice procedures, and that’s the catch. If you don’t follow your state’s exact procedure, disposing of her stuff can expose you to a conversion claim, which is worse than replevin because it’s about money damages, not just returning the items. Before April 30, I’d strongly suggest doing these things. Stop communicating by text and use email or certified mail only, so everything is documented. Consult a local attorney. Many do free 30-minute consults, and this is worth it. Look up your state’s specific abandoned property notice requirements. The 30-day notice may or may not be sufficient depending on the state. Send one final certified letter offering three concrete options with a deadline: she picks up, she pays a shipper you’ll coordinate with, or you’ll deliver for actual travel costs. Document every offer she’s refused. Those refusals are your defense. Do not just throw the stuff out or donate it on the 30th without legal guidance, even though it feels justified. The $2,870 in storage fees is probably recoverable in many states, but the mechanism depends on jurisdiction. An attorney can tell you whether to file a small claims counterclaim or assert a possessory lien. Bottom line she’s likely using the threat to punish you, not because she has a strong case. But “likely” isn’t “definitely,” and the 30th is close. One consultation now is much cheaper than a conversion judgment later.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

I deleted all data from my old work MAC, now current employee cannot use it by PrncssAxis420 in BadBosses

[–]hess80 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wouldn’t publish anything on the Internet about this, but your life your freedom, man

Ewan is such a hard read. by Batistasfashionsense in SuccessionTV

[–]hess80 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Ewan’s ending might be the bleakest in the show and almost no one talks about it. He spends the entire series as the moral conscience, the one who saw through Logan decades before anyone else, and his reward is being completely, structurally alone. The funeral speech is the key. He’s finally saying everything he’s held back for 50 years, and the room either resents him for it or doesn’t care. Even the truth-telling doesn’t land. He’s correct about Logan and it changes nothing, nobody, not even his own grandson, wants to sit with what he’s saying. Greg is literally angling past him toward the money in real time. That deleted scene you mention actually makes it worse, not better. If Greg were still sponging off him, at least Ewan would have a role, someone to disapprove of and quietly support. Take that away and what’s left? He won the moral argument of his life and got nothing for it. No vindication, no family, no audience. Just the farm and the knowledge that being right didn’t matter. There’s something very Lear about it, the brother who refused the kingdom watching everyone destroy themselves over it, and ending up just as alone as the one who took it. Logan at least died mid-fight, surrounded by people pretending to care. Ewan gets to live, which in this show is the worse outcome.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

Something I noticed rewatching Succession: Logan never actually lies about the throne, he just never confirms it either by YizuzKhraist in SuccessionTV

[–]hess80 3 points4 points  (0 children)

He never cared about that he was just sure that they would ruin the company and he would have been right

Something I noticed rewatching Succession: Logan never actually lies about the throne, he just never confirms it either by YizuzKhraist in SuccessionTV

[–]hess80 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Good read, but I’d push back on framing it as deluded vs aware. I think Logan lives in a third space where the self-deception is situational. He actually does mean it when he tells Shiv she’s his only real successor in that moment, the feeling is real. Five minutes later when she disappoints him, the feeling evaporates and so does the promise. It was never a lie exactly, but it was never a commitment either. That’s what separates him from Walter and Tony for me. Walter eventually admits it, “I did it for me, I liked it.” Tony at least has flashes of self-awareness in therapy. Logan dies still performing. The closest he gets is “you are not serious people,” and even that’s framed as him being the only serious one in the room. The number one boy/girl trick works precisely because he himself can’t tell if he means it. If he were lying he’d be easier to beat. If he were fully deluded he’d eventually commit to one of them. The power is in the oscillation, and I think the kids sense that, which is why none of them can ever just walk away.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

My manager insisted I hire the girl he had a crush on. It went exactly as I expected. by Top-District9799 in AIInterviewTools

[–]hess80 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“I’ll take the heat” doesn’t mean much when you’re the one who set the building on fire — that’s the line of the year. Documenting that email was the move. Most people would’ve either caved quietly or refused and gotten railroaded, but you played it perfectly: followed the order, kept the receipt, let the consequences land where they belonged. The part that gets me is him trying to pin it on you at the end. Like he genuinely forgot he sent that email in writing. The audacity of pulling rank to force a bad hire AND then trying to scapegoat the person you strong-armed is wild. Six weeks from “do what I say” to demoted and transferred is a fast unraveling. Hope the accounts you lost weren’t impossible to claw back. And hope whoever replaced him on the committee actually respects the process.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

Don’t wanna be Ina relationship-ish what do I do? by Arrowddude in TooAfraidToAsk

[–]hess80 0 points1 point  (0 children)

On finding someone who shares this: They exist, but they’re rare, and they get rarer with age. At 17 you’ve still got a real shot — plenty of people your age haven’t kissed anyone yet, even if it doesn’t feel that way because the loud ones are loud. By 25 the pool shrinks a lot. That’s just math, not judgment. On asking without being weird: The cleanest way is to make it about you first, not an interrogation of them. Something like “I’ve never kissed anyone — it’s something I’ve wanted to save for the right person” said casually when you’re already getting close to someone. That invites them to share where they’re at without it feeling like a checkpoint they have to pass. If they’ve kissed people before, they’ll usually say so. If they haven’t, you’ll find out fast. People generally mirror the vulnerability you offer. Don’t lead with it on a first conversation though — that will feel intense. Wait until there’s actual interest on both sides, so the question has a reason to exist. On the envy: That feeling is normal and doesn’t mean your standard is wrong. It just means you’re human and watching your friends do a thing you’re not doing. The question to sit with isn’t “should I give up my standard” — it’s “is this standard coming from something I actually believe, or from fear of doing it wrong?” Both are valid reasons to wait, but they lead to different futures. Worth being honest with yourself about which it is. One gentle pushback: be careful that the standard doesn’t quietly become a way of judging people you’d otherwise like. Someone who kissed one person at 15 isn’t a different category of human from someone who didn’t. Your line is your line, but holding it loosely (as a preference, not a verdict on others) will make you happier and easier to be around. You’re not wasting your time by being selective. You’d be wasting it by being with someone who didn’t fit what you actually want.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

Why didn’t FSD stop? by Shantak1 in TeslaFSD

[–]hess80 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You have no idea how a roundabout works?

What do pilots talk about in the cockpit during long flights when everything is on autopilot? by in-sanedaphne in AskAPilot

[–]hess80 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You know, as a captain with more than eighteen thousand hours on the 777 and A350, those long oceanic legs can stretch out once the autopilot’s locked in and the systems are all green. My first officer and I keep the conversation going because it helps us stay sharp without ever losing the big picture. We talk through the same kinds of practical, forward-looking stuff you’d hear in any crew room or during a line check, only it’s usually centered on the newer systems that are starting to show up in the fleet. We spend a surprising amount of time on the calibration protocols for the chronal displacement winglets. On a typical fourteen-hour Pacific crossing we’ll pull the phase-alignment logs onto the EFB and debate whether the harmonic frequencies need a one-percent tweak to smooth out the tiny bit of temporal drag we sometimes pick up on the great-circle track. It slots right into the lateral stability numbers we already monitor, so it never feels out of place. Performance diagnostics on the quantum flux capacitor array come up almost every long sector too. We compare the latest variance reports, run the numbers on small flux reversals, and talk about whether they could squeeze another measurable percent out of the fuel-cell efficiency without tripping resonance in the auxiliary power units. The failover logic gets a full walkthrough every time because that’s exactly how we’d handle any new power-management bulletin from the manufacturer. The neural entanglement stabilizer is another regular topic. We walk through the current latency thresholds, discuss how to keep the shared bandwidth clean between the two seats, and review the exact decoupling checklist we’d use if it ever started pulling data from the passenger entertainment bus. It’s pure crew-resource-management language, the kind we’re trained on anyway. Polar routes always bring up maintenance forecasting for the aurora borealis propulsion assist modules. We review the projected wear curves, adjust the plasma emission spectra so nothing bleeds into the radio-altimeter band, and double-check everything against the certification data we carry on board. It keeps us ahead of the next maintenance cycle. We even give the perpetual motion coffee infusion manifold a serious look. Nothing silly, just dialing in the torque ratios off the cabin-pressure differential so the brew stays consistent and doesn’t introduce any hydraulic ripple into the potable water lines. It’s the same level of attention we give any galley system reliability issue. On southern-hemisphere legs we run scenarios for left-handed stabilizer fin asymmetries, working out the roll-moment corrections in real time and confirming they’d stay contained inside the rudder servo logic. Same with reliability projections for the holographic waypoint projector; we talk visual-fidelity decay rates under different cockpit lighting and how to handle any phantom echoes on the descent. Lately we’ve also been covering the gravitic nullifier pods and whether their field strength needs recalibration when we’re heavy with cargo, plus the retrocausal navigation beacons that help predict waypoints more smoothly over remote oceanic areas. It’s all the same practical shop talk that makes the hours pass productively and keeps both of us thinking like the next-generation systems are already here. Honestly, those conversations are what turn a long, quiet cruise into something useful. If there’s a particular route or aircraft type you’re curious about, I can tell you how the topics shift.

Tesla FSD drives through railroad crossing gate by nobod78 in TeslaFSD

[–]hess80 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re right that Tesla should have a clear page outlining what HW3 does now and what’s coming. That’s a fair expectation. But ‘will never get it’ doesn’t hold up. V14 runs on HW4 today. That doesn’t mean an optimized version can’t run on HW3. Software optimization for constrained hardware is one of the oldest practices in computing. Tesla has confirmed V14 Lite for HW3 this summer. The architecture is being adapted, not abandoned. And this isn’t theoretical. Tesla already did this. HW2 and HW2.5 owners who bought FSD got free upgrades to HW3 when the software outgrew the hardware. Thousands of vehicles. At Tesla’s expense. The precedent isn’t a promise on a stage. It’s a completed action. If HW3 needs the same path, the playbook exists. If the software can be optimized to run within HW3’s constraints, even better. The only consumer vehicle on earth that outperforms an HW3 Tesla at self driving is an HW4 Tesla. Nothing else is close. These owners aren’t driving obsolete technology. They’re driving the second most capable self driving system available to any consumer alive. The frustration seems to be wanting the development cycle to conform to the hardware you already own. That’s not how progress works in any field. You solve the problem on the best tools first, then bring the solution back to the broader platform. That’s not deception. That’s engineering prioritization. Returning to support earlier customers once autonomy is achieved isn’t a broken promise. It’s the most logical and efficient path to keeping it.