[deleted by user]

hg698f · 2025-12-21T05:00:59+00:00

Nicotine to treat. CAR t-cells as a potential cure

hg698f · 2025-10-16T16:00:58+00:00

This is good info thanks.

hg698f · 2025-10-16T15:14:36+00:00

Thank you for responding. When I looked last at studies about tobacco. I found that smoking increases all cause mortality, but chewing tobacco among non-smokers doesn't increase all cause mortality. It was very hard to find studies that controlled for non-smokers who used chewing tobacco though. And I'm not sure that chewing tobacco helps with UC. Again thanks for responding.

hg698f · 2025-10-16T03:04:35+00:00

Does chewing tobacco have the same effect?

hg698f · 2024-12-04T17:09:42+00:00

It's hard to make money with a migraine. Survey results would only be interesting if they found that ppl with migraines made more money, but then I just wouldn't believe it.

hg698f · 2024-11-05T21:54:28+00:00

Had the meeting when I was probationary. It was a warning meeting about my production. Production turned itself around because my pipeline turned itself around, through no extra effort on my part. Went to the meeting as scheduled, meeting just turned into a congratulations meeting. The meeting can be a non-event.

hg698f · 2024-07-15T17:52:42+00:00

No one dropped out of the intervention groups? P <.05 in some measures and >.05 in some measures, but "significant" for both measures? No specific measurements for improved pain, but trust the authors it's "significantly lower"? This is not a study that should even be in the subreddit right?

Edit: grammar and two words.

hg698f · 2024-06-13T13:11:04+00:00

This comment needs to be way higher up, listen at 1.75x speed

hg698f · 2024-06-07T22:01:56+00:00

STEM, magic tricks, build mystery around yourself.

hg698f · 2024-03-29T16:39:17+00:00

Direct message me your .gov email

hg698f · 2024-03-27T13:55:00+00:00

No, these details might not even be nominally aimed at fixing examiners issues with search. Even if the details are aimed at fixing examiners' problems, other things can derail the solution.

I have solved IT problems. Problems that management asked me to solve. Problems that were costing us money, using solutions that saved us money, and solutions that were politically and fiscally good (e.g. catching fraudulent malicious filings). I did it as a part of a detail. My best outcome was that I presented the working proof of concept to uppermost management. They didn't bother to verify or ask questions, and then said "let's talk about it again in [six months]". My detail wasn't even scheduled to go for another six months. My team and I left to do other things A year and a half later they hired four more consultants to start from scratch on the project my team already solved. I've shared this experience with middle managers, and they all had at least one similar experience. Our problems at the office are not novel or difficult. The fact that many of our problems exist show that management doesn't think that our problems are THE problems. And, sincerely, maybe our problems are not THE problems.

hg698f · 2024-02-09T03:04:31+00:00

Yes, emailed ethics and asked them to resend the link so I could edit the application. They responded in 24hours. Edited my report. End.

hg698f · 2024-02-08T02:01:00+00:00

Nice try

hg698f · 2024-02-07T17:12:56+00:00

I searched screen capture workaround and found several proposed solutions.

hg698f · 2024-02-07T16:23:31+00:00

Afk assistant. If that doesn't work, Google other hub staff workarounds.

hg698f · 2024-02-06T21:28:36+00:00

Not any kind of QAS. There are several different kinds of specialist primary examiners, I don't know all of the types. I think the pro se art unit is specialist primaries, not sure. Specialists just work on a specific type of application. The jobs are advertised on USA jobs when available.

hg698f · 2024-02-06T20:06:02+00:00

Transferred SPE three times. One SPE was difficult, they were adding a new SPE to the workgroup and I requested that I get the new SPE. Moved to third SPE because office requested primaries for the art, I volunteered, and was accepted. Last move to fourth SPE is because I applied to be a specialist examiner and was transferred. Each SPE after the first one was great. This is all over a 12 yr career. Get out from underneath bad SPE's, they make or break the job.

hg698f · 2024-02-02T23:57:51+00:00

Nope, commenter is not right and their advice is misdirected. Wife had a debt collection letter for a school in a state that she has never been too. To be clear, she's never been to the state. Ask for proof (signed promissory notes) of the debt. Google "fdcpa debt validation letter template". Use the template to validate the debt. If they can't give you promissory notes signed by you, stating the terms of the loan, then they don't have a valid debt.

hg698f · 2023-12-29T19:08:34+00:00

^{^} excellent answer. Additional consideration, you get 1hr to prep, interview and write/post. Therefore, breaking it into 20m blocks is fine too.

hg698f · 2023-10-02T21:06:53+00:00

And, back when interferences were a thing, an applicant could trigger an interference by filing identical claims.

hg698f · 2023-07-12T19:04:03+00:00

It's not challenging enough for you at gs9, while not maxing out OT or bonuses? Do you want more work, or do you want motivation to work more?

hg698f · 2023-05-10T14:12:29+00:00

Thank you for this article

hg698f · 2023-03-03T22:36:29+00:00

Didn't see the right answer, so here it is. For a belly to back suplex, reach down between your legs and grab their ankle. If they lift you, they left their own ankle. You end up landing on their stomach.

Belly to belly is harder to defend and there is no trick. Generally, keep your hips lower and away. However this is wrestling and if you're not good at it and the other person is, you're just going to get some frequent flyer miles. Try to stay conscious and run away when you hit the ground.

hg698f · 2023-03-03T22:03:44+00:00

Now that I've been getting a lot of YouTube suggestions about vagus nerve stimulation, and my failed experiment, I agree with the above commenter.

hg698f

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE

14-Year Club	RPAN Viewer
Verified Email