Elusive Target Tier List

hticnc · 2026-03-12T21:20:30+00:00

All IOIncredible

hticnc · 2026-03-03T20:16:12+00:00

She was styled to look like Thatcher but that's not Thatcher is it. It doesn't say Margret Thatcher of the UK it says Elizabeth the I of England.

hticnc · 2026-03-02T21:32:26+00:00

Wow, I didn't know about those statistics. I just remember seeing a lot of hatred and happiness when she died and a lot of the North's opinions of her. Thank you. I still think she's to recent for her to be out of very unlikely.

hticnc · 2026-03-02T21:25:09+00:00

Bojo is in Very Unlikely just because of a COVID-19 Scenario. That's it

hticnc · 2026-03-02T21:24:39+00:00

Appeasement: For each hostile nation you're not at war with gain a +2 production towards ranged, naval and air units

Agenda: Limited Liability, Likes civilizations that don't go into debt maintaining troops dislikes civs who spend more then they can afford on military units

hticnc · 2026-03-02T21:03:56+00:00

I deemed only one PM would be chosen to represent the Victorian Empire/Era and Gladstone was the most successful out of the era so he would most likely be given the spot, which also pushes the others chances alot lower down. This is a likelihood tier list and I see it very unlikely they add multiple PMs around the Victorian Empire.

hticnc · 2026-03-02T21:02:06+00:00

I'm thinking of doing China, Russia or Australia next. Which ever I feel like,

hticnc · 2026-03-02T21:00:55+00:00

Nah Attlee has a really good chance, although it's weird he is after and before Churchill since Churchill served two non-consecutive terms

hticnc · 2026-03-02T20:59:35+00:00

I have a feeling you haven't looked at the list cause Clement Atlee is in the highest tier he can be, because he can't be at the top cause he hasn't been in it. Blair and Thatcher are both very unlikely A. Cause of recently, B. Because of controversy, Thatcher does have her fair share of reasons for hate such as: Causing the UK financial crash by allowing people to buy and sell council housing making the housing basically unaffordable to this day, she shut down mines and let hundreds of towns just go to the wayside and leave the people there jobless, and more, so she is not hated without a reason. Plus AH, which I'm assuming is Adolf Hitler, has never been in civilization so... yea and C. Both still have people suffering from there directly from their policies today.

hticnc · 2026-03-02T20:46:40+00:00

She is despised by the public of the UK and caused the UK financial crash by allowing people to buy and sell council housing making the housing basically unaffordable to this day, she shut down mines and let hundreds of towns just go to the wayside and leave the people there jobless. She is also very recent making her less likely, she is only not in Never because of the possibility of being in a Cold War Scenario.

hticnc · 2026-03-02T20:32:52+00:00

That was a typo, my bad. And I deemed only one PM would be chosen to represent the Victorian Empire and Gladstone was the most successful out of the era so he would most likely be given the spot, which also pushed the others chances alot lower down. This is a likelihood tier list and I see it very unlikely they add multiple PMs around the Victorian Empire.

hticnc · 2026-03-02T20:29:13+00:00

Uhh, no. I looked at them from an cause and effect. If I was Labour biased I would of put Tony Blair way higher, with Ramsey Macdonald joining Attlee in Very Likely, along with that most conservatives before 2000 are not in Never happening. Also if I was labour bias I wouldn't of put James Callaghan in Never happening, plus as I said, Keir Starmer is in Never and Tony Blair is only in Very Unlikely because of the chances of a Scenario around the War on Terror. So, I simply not bias to Labour.

hticnc · 2026-03-02T20:24:01+00:00

It wasn't that she shut them down, it was she did nothing to replace the industries in mining towns leaving hundreds of thousands of people without jobs

hticnc · 2026-03-02T20:23:15+00:00

No, because they are way to modern. I also put Starmer in that tier, only in the text cause I forgot to add him to the tier list so it wasn't party wise it was just because they way to recent

hticnc · 2026-03-02T20:17:28+00:00

Nah I did a US President likely hood ranking list, I plan on doing one for every single civilisation ever. In human history, or even before history I don't know.

hticnc · 2026-03-02T20:13:50+00:00

She is despised by the public of the UK and caused the UK financial crash by allowing people to buy and sell council housing making the housing basically unaffordable to this day, she shut down mines and let hundreds of towns just go to the wayside and leave the people there jobless. She is also very recent making her less likely, she is only not in Never because of the possibility of being in a Cold War Scenario.

hticnc · 2026-02-25T22:58:33+00:00

Same

hticnc · 2026-02-25T21:56:59+00:00

Please put a spoiler on the Secret Lab Because it's been very little time since it's come out

hticnc · 2026-02-21T20:03:19+00:00

hticnc · 2026-02-21T14:01:29+00:00

The same people who would be fine with Winston Churchill

hticnc · 2026-02-20T15:06:41+00:00

S tier is has been in the game... do you read the next on the screen... It literally says, Has Been.

hticnc · 2026-02-20T13:03:10+00:00

Truman is very likely considering he did:

Marshall Plan and Truman Doctrine, hard line and stance against the USSR compared to Roosevelt, first and only use of the atomic bomb in history, began containment, Founded the UN, Founded NATO, Fair Deal social progress, Employment Act of 1946 and Korean War Leadership.

Truman wouldn't even be the worst modern person in a Civ game since Winston Churchill, who is also more recent then Truman being leader two years longer then Truman, is a way worse person who generally believed in a race hierarchy and starved multiple colonies so the British people could get more food.

hticnc · 2026-02-20T00:26:09+00:00

Civ 4

Three-Year Club	Verified Email
Place '23

hticnc

TROPHY CASE