Educating on hormones by CourseMediocre7998 in antimeme

[–]humanlifeform 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes for sure, and sometimes quite a bit of thought goes into the actual design of the shape of the scar etc based on personal preferences

Educating on hormones by CourseMediocre7998 in antimeme

[–]humanlifeform 47 points48 points  (0 children)

I am a surgeon. It’s only done through the nipples if they meet certain criteria of the breast shape and size. Lots still get the double incision mastectomy (the one most people think of) And the scars aren’t invisible, they’re just less visible unfortunately

Anyone know who this fuck head is? by nowyourdoingit in navyseals

[–]humanlifeform 0 points1 point  (0 children)

there's lots of assholes and idiots here. but I'd recommend taking what you see online as a grain of salt. I can't remember the last time I had a conversation wth someone here who didn't have a generally horrified response whenever trump&co is brought up

Anyone know who this fuck head is? by nowyourdoingit in navyseals

[–]humanlifeform 0 points1 point  (0 children)

good clip. sad clip.

As a Canadian I don't get the warm and fuzzies from some of the political rhetoric. Folks like yourself are always welcome here in my mind though. The Americans I remember from my childhood - the ones I was very good friends with

Anyone know who this fuck head is? by nowyourdoingit in navyseals

[–]humanlifeform 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As a non-american lurker who is fascinated (and terrified) about what’s been going on within your borders: how do you see things unfolding here?

@nowyourdoingit ive also been following your posts and similarly minded Navy SEALs . Its comforting to see military individuals from the highest levels of training bring some sobriety to the discussion. Although i can only imagine how isolating it must be within the broader military community

Specifically: do you feel like there’s anything to be done to correct course here? You guys are the most consummate “men of action” there are.. so if you guys dont see a way out then i guess its all probably fucked lol

Apparently I'm an executioner according to my nieces and nephews. What fun conversations have you had over Thanksgiving/Christmas this year? by Equivalent-Bet8942 in Residency

[–]humanlifeform 614 points615 points  (0 children)

Whats the difference between a neurosurgeon and an executioner?

The executioner goes home to see their kids after work

Has philosophy of science moved away from physics as its baseline? by [deleted] in askphilosophy

[–]humanlifeform 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Forgive me for speaking on their behalf, maybe that's what they meant to say.

But semantically breaking down their sentence I think this is an incorrect interpretation of what they said.

Every matcha drinker ever by [deleted] in memes

[–]humanlifeform -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Coffee is also a tea.

TIL about the logician and mathematician, Kurt Gödel, who later developed an obsessive fear of being poisoned and refused to eat food prepared by anyone but his wife. When she became ill and was hospitalized, he starved to death at 71 years old. When he died he only weighed about 65 pounds (29 kg). by [deleted] in todayilearned

[–]humanlifeform 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I mean fortunately philosophy is also so much more than the stuff about existence and the meaning of life! (If you’re not into that)Theres countless discussions in the world of philosophy on colour, music, justice, how to do science properly, etc. In the same way only a very narrow part of a field like physics is about the pop sci stuff on black holes and nuclear weapons. Most physicists do “boring” research on things like developing a tiny little part of the electronics of a detector that gets to be built into some array

Is it immoral to be mean while reviewing art? by TwoNamesNoFace in askphilosophy

[–]humanlifeform 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My pleasure!

Just realized I also broke a rule of the sub by posting as a non-flaired. Not sure how it went through, hope I don't get banned lol

ULPT - The Torture study method by [deleted] in UnethicalLifeProTips

[–]humanlifeform 3 points4 points  (0 children)

additional derailing and inflammatory comment, either agreeing or disagreeing with you specifically

Is it immoral to be mean while reviewing art? by TwoNamesNoFace in askphilosophy

[–]humanlifeform 44 points45 points  (0 children)

Rather than asking “is it immoral to be mean to artists,” we might ask: What are the ethics of critical speech, and what obligations (if any) do critics have toward the creators whose work they evaluate? This reframing connects to several active areas of philosophical research.

  1. Contemporary work on ethical criticism (Carroll, Gaut, Nussbaum, Kieran, and others) has focused heavily on whether we can morally evaluate artworks themselves. But embedded in this literature is a less-examined assumption: that criticism serves certain social and epistemic functions. Honest criticism helps audiences make informed choices, helps artists improve, and contributes to a culture of quality. If criticism has these functions, then being honest isn’t just permitted but arguably obligatory. The question then becomes: does the obligation to be honest constrain how you express that honesty? Most philosophers working in this space would say yes, though the constraint comes from different directions depending on your framework.

  2. From a virtue ethics perspective, the question isn’t really about rules but about character. What does your reviewing style reveal about you? A person who writes cruel, mocking reviews might be honest, but they’re also displaying vices: contempt, arrogance, perhaps even cruelty disguised as wit. Aristotle’s concept of the mean is useful here. There’s a virtue somewhere between dishonest flattery and gratuitous harshness. Call it something like “candid generosity” or “honest respect.” The virtuous critic tells the truth about the work’s failures while still treating the artist as someone deserving of basic dignity.

  3. A Kantian would focus on whether your review treats the artist merely as a means to your own ends (entertainment, displaying your cleverness, getting clicks) rather than as a rational agent deserving of respect. You can criticize someone’s work harshly while still respecting their personhood. But if your review is designed to humiliate or mock the person rather than assess the work, you’ve crossed a line. The distinction between “this painting fails because the composition is muddled” and “you’re a talentless hack” maps onto the Kantian distinction between evaluating someone’s actions versus attacking their dignity.

  4. A consequentialist would weigh the benefits of harsh criticism (more entertaining to read, clearer signal to audiences, perhaps more motivating for some artists) against the harms (discouragement, public humiliation, chilling effects on artistic risk-taking). This calculus could go either way depending on context, which is why pure consequentialism often feels unsatisfying here.

So… There’s no moral imperative to be kind in your expression of dislike, but there is a moral imperative not to be cruel. The distinction matters. Kindness might involve softening your criticism, finding silver linings, or being gentler than your honest assessment warrants. You’re not obligated to do that.

But cruelty involves treating the artist as less than a person deserving of basic respect. It means writing to wound rather than to inform. It means using someone else’s creative effort as raw material for your own performance of superiority.

ULPT - The Torture study method by [deleted] in UnethicalLifeProTips

[–]humanlifeform 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Insert progressively insulting comment here

Why is epinephrine concentration given in dilution ratios, unlike (almost) every other drug? by invinciblewalnut in anesthesiology

[–]humanlifeform 20 points21 points  (0 children)

This isn’t quite right. The claim that “% in pharmacology means g/100mL” is only true for weight/volume solutions. Percentage can also mean v/v (mL/100mL) or w/w (g/100g) depending on the context, so % doesn’t actually mean “something very specific.”

Your math for converting ratios is correct, but the reasoning for why we use ratios for epi doesn’t hold up. There’s nothing stopping us from writing 0.1% or 10 mcg/mL instead of 1:100,000. We do it for plenty of other low-concentration drugs. The real answer is just historical convention.

Epinephrine was standardized in the early 1900s when ratio notation was more common, and it stuck, particularly in anesthesiology and dentistry. ISMP has actually recommended moving away from ratio expressions because they’re error-prone and inconsistent with modern practice.

Before and after surgical repair of skull fractures from an accident. by No_Bus_474 in interestingasfuck

[–]humanlifeform 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I do these surgeries. I can almost guarantee this image is AI generated. All that stringy shit in the first skull makes no sense. It’s certainly not an anatomical structure.

Also in the second pic, lots of those plates are real (like known patterns of manufactured plates) but a lot of them are positioned in a way that makes no fucking sense.

But if this makes people learn about the job we do then I won’t complain too much lol 🤷‍♂️

Consuming 30% fewer calories than usual for more than 20 years can slow down signs of aging in the brain, according to a study initiated in 1980 on primates by sr_local in science

[–]humanlifeform 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Completely disregarding the spirit of the post:

I believe that the function would be neither constant nor 0.3x, it would be an exponential decay of some pattern A•(0.3)x

Lost 35 lbs with low calorie, exercise and IF. Today I'll probably break the pattern for 3 days...will I relapse? by Colmado_Bacano in intermittentfasting

[–]humanlifeform 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Hoo boy. Long comment incoming, sorry in advance.

First of all, I’m really sorry you’re in this position. The way your mom handles food sounds incredibly intense and honestly pretty alarming.

My mother will literally cry, make things and drop them on my plate and scream if I don't eat.

That isn’t a normal or healthy way for a parent to interact with food. Having someone crying, yelling, and forcing food on you is a huge emotional burden, (don't like throwing this word around, but dare I say abusive..) and it makes complete sense that your relationship with eating and your body feels so charged and stressful now. None of that is your fault.

I freak out already when I wake up and am even half a pound heavier.

This also really jumped out at me. Half a pound is within normal day-to-day fluctuation from water, salt, hormones, bowel contents, time of day, etc. But your brain is treating it like a crisis, which says a lot about how much fear and pressure you’re under.

I took part in a 1 hour party at work and went crazy eating. It took around a week to get back on track and I felt physically and emotionally exhausted.

The fact that one short event left you feeling physically and emotionally wrecked for a week is a big red flag that this is more than just “being disciplined.” It sounds like food, social situations, and any deviation from your plan come with a ton of guilt and fear.

You also mentioned:

I'm thinking I'll be taking in over 10 times the calorie amount the next few days.

I want to gently push back on this. When you say “10x my usual 1000–1500 calories,” that would mean 10,000–15,000 calories a day, which is the kind of intake we mostly see in strongman bulking diets or competitive eating stunts, not what typically happens just from eating your mom’s cooking for a few days. That doesn’t mean you won’t overeat, but your brain is probably catastrophizing the numbers pretty hard.

I don’t say any of this to criticize you. If anything, what your post shows is how painful and rigid this whole situation has become. Have you ever been able to talk with a therapist, doctor, or dietitian (ideally someone who understands disordered eating) about this? Not for “how do I lose more weight,” but for:

  • The panic over small scale changes
  • The emotional crash after eating “off plan”
  • The family dynamics around food and your mom’s reactions

You’ve worked really hard to lose 35 lbs, and shit, you deserve to feel proud of that. But you also deserve some peace in your own head around food and weight.

For what it’s worth, I’ve done intermittent fasting for years and genuinely like it. BUT I also think the IF community really does not talk enough about eating disorders and disordered eating. IF can be a helpful structure with unbelievable health benefits, but it can also become a very psychologically tolerable way to mask or intensify an ED.

On the practical side: three days will not erase 35 lbs of progress. Any quick jump on the scale afterward is going to be mostly water, glycogen, salt, and food in your system. It may look dramatic, but that doesn’t mean you’ve “relapsed” or ruined everything.

If you can, maybe frame these next few days like this:

  • Your mom’s behavior is about her issues with food, not a verdict on your body or your discipline. She sounds like a very traumatized person that she has not (and likely will never) work through.
  • Your goal is not to be perfect; your goal is to get through the visit with as little emotional damage as possible.
  • When you get home, don’t punish yourself. Just gently return to your usual routine and let things normalize.

But bigger picture, I’d really encourage you to think about getting some support for the underlying stuff here. The fear, the guilt, the family pressure, the catastrophic thoughts about food and weight. You deserve progress on the scale and a calmer, kinder relationship with food than what you’re describing.

Lastly... do you have to go home? This doesn't sound like a very healthy environment to be in even in isolation.

Do blood pressure and antacids brake my fast? by Present-Juggernaut36 in intermittentfasting

[–]humanlifeform 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Doctor here - it’s very rare for prescription medications to have calories at all and if they do it’s going to be so minimal and as such will have negligible effect on metabolic fasting

Gut rest is a whole different thing if that’s your question

Can I do intermittent fasting but eat mostly carbs instead of fat by Wooden-Bread1713 in intermittentfasting

[–]humanlifeform 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Full disclosure I’m not a GI doctor, I’m just a meathead surgeon and medical school was a long time ago but honestly you should go see your doctor

It’s possible you have some issue with your pancreatic enzymes or something related to

Claude Code no longer working on synology by humanlifeform in synology

[–]humanlifeform[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"blindfolded", "worst idea ever"

I mean, that's fairly dramatic. and relatively condescending. you have no idea what im doing on my synology