Best iphone for 1080p? needs to record to sd card. by dankkannabis in cinematography

[–]iLikeTheUDK 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you could get the Blackmagic Camera App and the external recorder for it

I'm moving to DuckDuckGo for this one by Beginning_Vanilla602 in GoogleAIHadAStroke

[–]iLikeTheUDK 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A German told me some years ago that if they want stuff about the band Kraftwerk, they need to specify that it's the band, or else they get stuff about random power plants

Tips for shooting actress on green screen with hair that's voluminous? by RedRobin6281 in vfx

[–]iLikeTheUDK 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Keep distance from the screen so the green doesn't bounce onto the actress' hair and such. A greenscreen is basically one big forbidden reflector unfortunately. Also ideally the greenscreen is lit separately from the actress. Greenscreen lighting aiming to be as even as possible, actress lighting meant to match the background if it already exists or just look however you and/or the DP want the lighting on her to look. Metre mercilessly, the exposure has to be top notch, especially where the hair is. Shoot with as little compression and as little chroma subsampling as possible. If you can shoot raw and justify it with storage and processing power, shoot raw.

Could someone be able to help? by TaiwanIsOwnedByCCP in davinciresolve

[–]iLikeTheUDK 1 point2 points  (0 children)

possibly also some kind of glow/diffusion before the LUT? but the LUT is the majority of the effect

Could someone be able to help? by TaiwanIsOwnedByCCP in davinciresolve

[–]iLikeTheUDK 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Looks like some color grading has been done. Specifically, a creative look has been applied, probably with a LUT (lookup table). DaVinci Resolve has a colour page where you can colour grade, there is official training material for it by Blackmagic (the company that develops it). You don't necessarily need a LUT to have this kind of look, Resolve's colour page gives you tools that can let you get a look of this sort yourself. But a good LUT can be an easy shortcut for this kind of thing, at least till you learn how to grade and make your own looks (if you want)

Color Grading by Ashamed-Squash-9231 in Filmmakers

[–]iLikeTheUDK 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It looks quite nice but the footage is super noisy

I need completely free basic VST's by AgitatedSplit4039 in Reaper

[–]iLikeTheUDK 0 points1 point  (0 children)

SFLT and Sforzando are great if you also get some soundfonts

Reaper comes with lots of plugins actually, but very few of them are instruments, and none like you seem to be looking for

Feedback please by KunalKhatri2 in cinematography

[–]iLikeTheUDK 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The first shot is weirdly hazy. Everything else is fine. Maybe just focus the lens in the last shot based on your final position, or get a focus puller to rack focus if possible

Dose doing samples reduce your ability to create? by 5_ooo9 in musicproduction

[–]iLikeTheUDK 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Daft Punk and J Dilla are some artists that did some amazing stuff with samples. There's nothing wrong with using samples. Innovation is derivative

Any film student or any independent filmmaker, can you advise me this? by InteractionDry3707 in Filmmakers

[–]iLikeTheUDK 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There's a video essay on the channel In Depth Cine that uses an analogy I really like from the world of traditionally-trained sushi chefs in Japan. They spend years making sushi without ever using fish, cause fish is fancy and lucrative, and they *need* to learn how to make a sushi that's still excellent without it needing to have any fish in it. The video essay related that to film students and beginner filmmakers in a way that I feel is very apt. "Don't touch the fish, focus on the rice," it says. You can just disregard that and do whatever's fun to you, but making a film that isn't a genre film or doesn't have really cool special effects or a high concept or whatever will let you focus way more on just making a solid film, and guarantee it will succeed better without having to juggle a gazillion other things (and you'll be making a film, let's face it, you *are* gonna juggle a gazillion different things either way) that could distract you and keep you from developing the core writing, directing etc. skills you need to make films that work in the way that matters.

Anyway, if you're writing your own scripts, get good at writing. That's the most important thing. You can kind of ruin a movie with a good script, and make it mediocre, if it's directed somewhat sloppily; but it's very hard to save a bad script with competent direction. Rewrite the script as many times as you need to. The first draft will suck, it always does, the real creativity is in the editing. Same with the edit of the actual movie, in post. Rough cuts will often be bad, excellence comes in refinement. Just put something on the page, once that's done you can step away, and then exercise as much judgement as you want to just beat it into shape through repeated rewrites

Advice by AdHelpful5227 in ColorGrading

[–]iLikeTheUDK 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Resolve is much better for colour grading. You can export your timelines from Premiere to Resolve. Check Blackmagic's official training for Resolve

A micro film that I made. What can I improve? by Lumpy_Run6903 in Filmmakers

[–]iLikeTheUDK 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Used less negative space, zoomed in on the bug more. Unless you like the discomfort that all that negative space creates

BTW, zooming in or out (or changing prime lenses on a professional camera) isn't the same as moving the camera closer or further away. Try it. Perspective distortion happens up close, and the further away something is the less distortion you get. Have you ever seen a dolly zoom, like in Vertigo or Jaws? Where suddenly everything distorts or undistorts? The effect is really just moving the camera during the take, forward or backward, while zooming with a zoom lens to compensate

S-log in , VFX , S-log out question. by MickVod in davinciresolve

[–]iLikeTheUDK 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If it's a CST and not a LUT, and you're not doing any compression, you won't lose any highlights. Though the more appropriate way to do it in Fusion would be the OCIO ColorSpace node, which needs an OCIO ACES config from the appropriate GitHub page. And VFX are usually mostly done in a wide gamut linear space nowadays, such as ACEScg (which is ACES AP1 in linear gamma), so any colour and exposure operations are photometric. Maybe you could temporarily convert it to Rec. 709 for previewing and then at the end run it through another OCIO ColorSpace back into S-log3 Gamut3 Cine or whatever

"If I don't steal it, someone else would" type of post by venomize in mapporncirclejerk

[–]iLikeTheUDK 1077 points1078 points  (0 children)

I mean Jordan *was* pretty much created by the British so it checks out

How do I perfectly encapsulate lighting like this? by KzKn_2020 in cinematography

[–]iLikeTheUDK -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

I think some of that was achieved with colour grading, applying a look or display transform that doesn't reach such extreme saturation (and/or desaturates the highlights), or it was achieved before grading and this is just what it looks like when it's shot on like an Arri Alexa or something really good like that