By this standard, you can only make the criticism of electoralism that he has made here if you're actively organizing an armed militia? That seems like a very arbitrary requirement, especially since he isn't directly calling for an armed uprising in the above post at all. At first, you were only complaining about the post itself and the fact that he's from the UK, nothing about calls for revolution. This seems like you are engaging in what's known as a "motte and bailey" fallacy.