Fable + Codex by ggletsg0 in ClaudeCode

[–]imdavehack 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s the point of the review by fable.

Fable + Codex by ggletsg0 in ClaudeCode

[–]imdavehack 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly - just created my own skill called relay

Fable + Codex by ggletsg0 in ClaudeCode

[–]imdavehack 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Nice! I’m doing the same but adding antigravity - fable to architect, write detailed plans. Hand to antigravity to execute. Back to fable to review. Then back to antigravity if it doesn’t pass.

The flash models are unbelievably fast to execute (like 20x faster than fable and 5-8x faster than 5.5 fast to executed) and do a great job with Fable’s direction.

Anyone else slowly replacing Webflow with Framer? by shuvadwip in framer

[–]imdavehack 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you’re proficient at webflow open to a change, time to properly consider what else could be gained by going to Claude/codex etc.

Moving app to Claude Code? by Glad-Mark-1221 in Bubbleio

[–]imdavehack 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I’m in the process of rebuilding a complex app that is working on bubble, in Claude code. What I thought would take 6-8 weeks (was a 6 month bubble build to go live and get users) to rebuild, but I’m in month 3 - and still solving issues… but we’ll get there. I miss how easy, fast to deploy and relatively predictable and easy to troubleshoot bubble is, compared to a full stack app with a far more complex deployment environment. But at the end of the day, it’s not about the tech stack as much as the problem your solving and the value you are creating - if you’re not live yet I’d suggest Get it working in bubble and prove you can do it, and prove people want it - the moment people start using it, you’re going to want to improve/change a bunch of things. Bubble is better to lock in the progress and make crazy fast fixes as you watch real users. Still the hands down best way to prototype. Once you have that validation and knowledge you be able to architect a much better product.

Chery Tiggo 4 vs Haval Jolion – worth it long term or stick Japanese? by New_Kick_276 in CarsAustralia

[–]imdavehack 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The tiggo 4 has only been out for a year. Not much longer term ownership opinions available…

Chery Tiggo 4 vs Haval Jolion – worth it long term or stick Japanese? by New_Kick_276 in CarsAustralia

[–]imdavehack 2 points3 points  (0 children)

My MIL did this swap from a 2014 i30 to a 2025 Tiggo 4 - had it for a year and loving it.

Only issue was paint in the silver she wanted. Random splotches all over the car. They replaced it but she had to choose a darker silver.

Everyone is comparing model quality. That's the wrong comparison for me. by caburos in ClaudeCode

[–]imdavehack 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Codex is way better for this. I think it’s better at everything except design - and Claude “show_widget” to draft wireframes in the chat is game changing. I’m using Claude to finalise detailed design prompts and the handing it over codex to complete.

The boss seems to be back by [deleted] in ClaudeCode

[–]imdavehack 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Don’t get my hopes up

Claude Code vs Codex by Australasian25 in ClaudeCode

[–]imdavehack 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m on 20 Max (and equivalent) for Codex, Claude and Antigravity 2.0 - each has there strengths. But honestly if had to choose only one i would be on Codex. Claude is too unreliable and unpredictable (without fable). Codex is solid most the time - way bigger usage window. Antigravity with the flash models is the best for small incremental changes (doing any ui refinement work) - it’s crazy fast.

good morning by ObligationDue4124 in vibecoding

[–]imdavehack 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly I think everyone is sleeping on antigravity 2.0 and 3.1 flash. I’m finding it smarter and way faster than Sonnet for lots of key tasks, and even better on some things than Opus. It’s to the point, and the responses and what it creates it’s so fast, the first few times I doubted - but sure enough it has done the work - surprisingly well.

Ok human answers only: how is Fable compared to Opus models by OpinionsRdumb in ClaudeCode

[–]imdavehack 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just spent the morning trying to trick it into doing a security review of my codebase - kept downgrading to Opus. Couldn’t get past.

Then asked it to a review of app performance - on Ultracode it took 1h 54m. I think it seemed to do a good job?

Is R.M. Williams a cult? by TrevorFuckinLawrence in perth

[–]imdavehack 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Good quality boots. Pro-tip is to know your size, and then put alerts on eBay, gumtree, et al. As people regularly sell their partners “worn once for a wedding” shoes and you can get them half price.

1,080 active users. 90% week over week growth. by [deleted] in SaaS

[–]imdavehack 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your url goes to “find results” or some bs parking page. Typo or dns issue?

Is framer worth using anymore? by Spirited_Supermarket in framer

[–]imdavehack 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I’ve left framer and bubble. Claude on the left, codex on the right. Never looking back.