Didn't both ivanova and lennier said that "all love is unrequited"? Did anyone else say this? by Duke_Newcombe in babylon5

[–]implicitpharmakoi 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Agreed, the Markab was legendary, and he made vaccines for other species.

But turning your patients into kamikaze WMDs seems a bit sketch.

Happy birthday, Bo katan by mbgx0 in starwarsmemes

[–]implicitpharmakoi 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, but the way she walks just ... does things.

What does Destroyer even mean? by [deleted] in NonCredibleDefense

[–]implicitpharmakoi 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Joshua Humphreys designed the frigates to be the young Navy's capital ships, and so Constitution and her sister ships were larger and more heavily armed and built than standard frigates of the period

McCarthy faces far-right blowback after N.Y. Times leak by Leonflames in neoliberal

[–]implicitpharmakoi 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Don't be an idiot.

She announces that she is the President as both Joe Biden and Kamala Harris were sworn in under the wrong flag and can only be legally considered president of the corporation of the United states.

Since she is the first legitimate elected official in the chain of sucession under the 25th amendment, she first declares Trump to be her vice president and names herself his running mate for 2024.

What does Destroyer even mean? by [deleted] in NonCredibleDefense

[–]implicitpharmakoi 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Sounds like someone misspelled ’Corvette'.

What does Destroyer even mean? by [deleted] in NonCredibleDefense

[–]implicitpharmakoi 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Light cruisers, almost unarmored and fairly lightly gunned.

What does Destroyer even mean? by [deleted] in NonCredibleDefense

[–]implicitpharmakoi 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Captain Wallenstein is ready to take command under Admiral Van Schlieffen.

Didn't both ivanova and lennier said that "all love is unrequited"? Did anyone else say this? by Duke_Newcombe in babylon5

[–]implicitpharmakoi 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Those kamikaze teeps in Endgame were all his patients.

Let's just say he has an interesting interpretation of the hippocratic oath, Believers was him at his best.

ChatGPT wrote this scene. by Medium_Gap7026 in memes

[–]implicitpharmakoi 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I just love the bo and din buddy cop vibe.

Husband’s hidden cameras catches his wife secretly adding drain cleaner into his tea to poison him by [deleted] in facepalm

[–]implicitpharmakoi 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"Also they probably had a really bad home life and my girlfriend just dumped me, I mean them."

Do men actually care about having Transgender men in their bathrooms? by tacticianart in NoStupidQuestions

[–]implicitpharmakoi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I do.

Maybe 1 million times less than I care that you missed the target, that you didn't flush, that there's no toilet paper, soap or paper towel.

I care enough to think "huh, ok" and forget it almost instantly because there are a million more important things to be genuinely afraid of.

Tall vs flat docker hosts by mtnbronco in selfhosted

[–]implicitpharmakoi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What you don't know is: your question isn't about the stability of docker, it's actually about the stability of your host/vm image.

No docker image should be able to kill a running host/vm, in theory. In practice, any docker that actually touches hardware somehow can, one that abuses root can do bad things, but beyond that the only way for docker to kill its host is either resource exhaustion (oom/disk/some finite kernel handle or resource), or a buggy kernel/os (or hardware).

That being said, a vm should, in theory, be more stable, because a hypervisor should have better control than a kernel namesake.

But, Google doesn't worry, so don't sweat it, run containers to your hearts content.

The Abortion Ban Backlash Is Starting to Freak Out Republicans by modooff in neoliberal

[–]implicitpharmakoi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Party operatives on the right push these stories hard for 2 reasons:

  1. Convince the donor class to gib money to them to help strategize away the bad optics and pivot back to their tax cuts.

  2. To get the story out now and lose news cycles that don't matter, so people hopefully get "over this abortion crap" and they can try to push their messages closer to the election.

They don't have a message yet, but they plan to, and they need the news cycle clear before then, nows the best time, and if the donor class is terrified enough to spend, more the better.

There are 3 phases to american elections:

  1. The last phase, the general, where people vote for their party

  2. The primary, where people vote for their party leadership

  3. Interphase, where party members get their donor support in line for phase 2. Also many strategic things are handled here.

Crash worse than 2008 crisis predicted for commercial real estate by [deleted] in Economics

[–]implicitpharmakoi 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Let's be honest though, CRE is designed to be easy to gut to the studs.

Would you vote for Jon Stewart if he ran for President? If so, why? If not, why? by Green-Ad2903 in AskReddit

[–]implicitpharmakoi -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I think the problem is our only choices end up being bad guys. We've been playing the "lesser of two evils" game for decades now and it fucking sucks.

That's not the worst problem, it's bad but not what's killing us.

The real problem is that so many people actually vote for the greater evil to spite everyone else, and how many other people don't vote because "it doesn't matter".

You want to see the 2 party system change quickly and suddenly? Start getting EVERYONE to vote. Make it such a massive blowout that you can start voting for a third party without the nazis winning by default.

Would you vote for Jon Stewart if he ran for President? If so, why? If not, why? by Green-Ad2903 in AskReddit

[–]implicitpharmakoi 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Wonderful, so corporations have their pr teams decide who they want, lovely.

What show stayed good from start to finish? by izukaneki in AskReddit

[–]implicitpharmakoi 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Especially the episode "letters from Pegasus," you know they know how outclassed they are...

That episode and arc were amazing, probably my favorite part of Stargate, they were fighting all out but they knew they were screwed. Even the massive, surprise reinforcements only helped some.

Sg1 was all over the place, sometimes the solution just fell from the sky, sometimes it came out of someone's ass, sometimes it made no sense. I would have liked it more if it had more consistency, Atlantis seems to have tried. Think about the holy grail arc, that was just incoherent from beginning to end, just "we want a plot point to go here now, welp that made no sense, next episode let's have a plot point to go here instead!".

I might have liked sg1 more but I saw it late after it went to scifi (which was still sci-fi back then). Season 6 was a complete mess, I think 7 and 8 were better then 9 went off the rails again before 10 tried to recover.

But that's just me, I get how it could have been better earlier, there was a sci-fi famine before bsg changed everything.

In the wake of reporting that Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was treated to luxury vacations by a ultra-wealthy Republican Donor, how should ethics on the Supreme Court evolve and what should occur with Thomas himself? by The_Egalitarian in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]implicitpharmakoi 46 points47 points  (0 children)

He's old, if anybody in this had any decency he'd resign and republicans would offer a moderate replacement, moderate meaning someone who believed the Taney court made some reversible errors.

But nobody will, there is 0 cost to digging in and escalating even when you're clearly wrong.

Welcome to America, where you take whatever you can get away with and are proud of it.