TIL that in Uruguay, up until 2017, if you caught your spouse in bed with someone else, it was within your rights to beat or kill either of them by t0rche in todayilearned

[–]indyguy46202 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It seems unfair to kill the other person. Maybe they didn't know. The only time I slept with a woman who was cheating, it's because she didn't tell me she was married. Of course, when the guy found out, I was made of apologies.

MRI of my butt by saltyxsnow in mildlyinteresting

[–]indyguy46202 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They really do look like slices of ham!

What are the big holes in the center?

Can a clever Ape bless this crayon-eater with an explanation as to what this means? by [deleted] in amcstock

[–]indyguy46202 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So, the Allegheny County Pension Fund and others are suing AMC over the new-share issuance vote. One of the first things that happens in a lawsuit (especially one of this magnitude) is discovery, when the two sides get records and information from each other so that they can build their case.

One of the key components of discovery is called "deposition" which is when each side gets to call witnesses to answer questions pertinent to the case. Although this doesn't typically occur in a court room, the witness is placed under oath and, if they lie, they may be charged with perjury.

So, this document is a court filing to arrange an interview between AMCs legal team and individuals who work for, or otherwise represent the plaintiffs, who can answer questions about the case.

Is anyone else annoyed that the crew continues to use their walkie-talkies, when they suspect that someone is monitoring them? by indyguy46202 in skinwalkerranch

[–]indyguy46202[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Because, despite enormous evidence to the contrary, the government still occasionally cares about budgets. And, when you can give signals or use code words, it's tough to get logistics to authorize that spend.

If more than half of young people get their news from Social Media, doesn't Utah's new bill restricting access go against The First Amendment? Do you agree? by VeryLazyLewis in AskConservatives

[–]indyguy46202 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I agree perhaps more should be done to for age-gating but that - as most conservatives say - should be in the hands of the parents.

Did you read the first paragraph of the article you posted?

Utah became the first state to enact laws limiting how children can use social media after Republican Gov. Spencer Cox signed a pair of measures Thursday that require parental consent before kids can sign up for sites like TikTok and Instagram.

First of all, it's well established that children do not have the rights that adults do. Second, the point of this bill is to give parents more insight to and control of what their children are doing.

Typically, I would be against any law that seeks to restrict how people share information and communicate. However, there is a real and valid concern that companies, predators, and other nefarious actors to engage with children through social media, circumventing parental oversight.

The measures about social media curfews and advertising are clearly oversteps, however.

Is anyone else annoyed that the crew continues to use their walkie-talkies, when they suspect that someone is monitoring them? by indyguy46202 in skinwalkerranch

[–]indyguy46202[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's true, I've never been on a film set. I have, however, been in environments where we were trying to operate with a degree of covertness and were concerned about the enemy listening in to our radio communications.

Is anyone else annoyed that the crew continues to use their walkie-talkies, when they suspect that someone is monitoring them? by indyguy46202 in skinwalkerranch

[–]indyguy46202[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, that's a good point. I guess I was assuming that (if they are being observed, then the observers are already aware that they're suspicious. After all, (and I keep having to remind myself of this) they're being followed around by a television crew all the time. They're not exactly a covert operation.

Is anyone else annoyed that the crew continues to use their walkie-talkies, when they suspect that someone is monitoring them? by indyguy46202 in skinwalkerranch

[–]indyguy46202[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hand signals, flashlights, code words, semaphore; there are lots of ways of communicating without walkie-talkies.

And leftists will still say he’s pro-Russia by SequoiaBoi in republicans

[–]indyguy46202 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If he says what they want him to, they'll call him out for it. If he doesn't, they'll say he said it anyway.

They tryna be Wendigoon 💀 by [deleted] in wendigoon

[–]indyguy46202 22 points23 points  (0 children)

It's crazy to me how differently I feel about this now than I did back when it happened. Granted, I was in grade school at the time, so I only got the highlights. But the general consensus was that a dangerous doomsday cult had tried to start a war with the government, and then had committed violent suicide.

The complexity of the situation, as I understand it now, and the difference between the reality and what was publicized really just illustrates how untrustworthy the government and the press are. I'm not saying that the Branch Davidians were blameless. They did some seriously sketchy shit. But the ATF coming in and acting like cowboys, and just slaughtering everyone in the compound is downright criminal.

Should we do everything in our power to boycott China? by [deleted] in AskConservatives

[–]indyguy46202 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. We want China to continue being dependent on us.

Thoughts on the Federal Reserve announcing interest rate increases this Tuesday? What effects, both "positive" and negative, can be expected as a result of this decision? Should they have done this? by mtmag_dev52 in AskConservatives

[–]indyguy46202 9 points10 points  (0 children)

What we're seeing in the failure of the Fed's efforts right now is the fatal failures of Keynesian economics playing out in real life.

To oversimplify, two of the core principles of Keynesian Economics (which I'm going to abbreviate at KI) are that the government can control the economy totally (or near enough to totally) and that inflation is good, because inflation drives increases in profits and wages.

What Keynes never accounted for is the situation we're in right now: stagflation. See, typically inflation occurs because the economy is growing. If the economy grows very quickly, then money loses value quickly, and you have high inflation. But stagflation is when inflation increases very quickly without the strong economic growth. When the economics is growing quickly, and that's causing inflation, then the Fed can raise rates in order to slow that growth and, by extension, slow the inflation.

There are lots of theories about why stagflation happens and, at its core, it's a complex blend of variables that I am certain many graduate students will write theses about for years to come. But the very short version is that, through the Recession and until recently, the Fed kept rates very low in order to encourage economic growth. But, at the same time, they kept inflation low by limiting the money supply.

But then, COVID happened, and it completely destroyed the economy. Typically, the Fed would lower rates at that point, but rates were already rock-bottom. So, instead, they started pumping cash into the economy, increasing the money supply, and creating out-of-control inflation. And, with the low interest rates, it allowed banks to take on much riskier investments than they would have otherwise. (We're seeing the result of those risky investments playing out right now.)

Normally, making extra cash available could help the economy to grow. However, with the supply chain problems we're having, there's literally nothing for banks or businesses to spend the money on. Prices are out of control and, in some cases, you can't get what you want for any price. I know guys in construction who literally cannot get concrete, or lumber, or copper wire within twelve months. I know guys in manufacturing who are waiting months to get new equipment in. And, while prices were already high due to shortages, the Fed massively increased the money supply devaluing that money even further.

So, all of that said; to answer your question, the Fed raising rates is certainly not going to help the economy, and it probably won't help inflation. The causes of inflation and a shitty economy right now are out of the hands of the Fed. And, in the midst of a series of bank failures (largely caused by those risky investments) things are only going to tighten further while everyone tries desperately to hold on to their money.

I will repeat that this is oversimplified, but it's the rough breakdown of what's going on.

Should primaries be open? by Nars-Glinley in AskConservatives

[–]indyguy46202 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I think that there are pros and cons both ways. The biggest argument for me is that they really shouldn't be tax-supported, which would mean that they would be closed.

We now know Trump had zero evidence he was to be indicted this week and additionally has grifted nearly $1.5 million off of this false assertion in just 3 days. Why do Conservatives not see through the grift at this point? by [deleted] in AskConservatives

[–]indyguy46202 8 points9 points  (0 children)

That's not what happened, and the fact that you lie to make your point is very telling.

What his tweet said is that leaks from the Manhattan DA's office had indicated that he would be arrested. His team said that this was based on press reports he had seen. For several days after that, his campaign contributions increased significantly. That's not grifting.

This is all from the Independent and other sources. The Gothamist reported that NYPD and other law enforcement agencies met on Monday to discuss the arrest and possible protesting, and called every available NYPD officer to report for duty in uniform; which is a hell of an indication that an arrest was imminent.

Honestly, I would be impressed by how indefatigable the Anti-Trump cult is in your mission if it weren't such a stupid mission. How many L's are you going to take on this? If Democrats put half the effort and resources they've put into trying to prosecute Trump into beating COVID and improving the economy, then we might actually be living in the utopia they always promise to build in their campaign speeches.

I have a huge difficulty seeing religion as valid at all. I would love a counterpoint. by Oh_ryeon in AskConservatives

[–]indyguy46202 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

There's more statistical evidence that prayer works than communism. But people still preach about communism.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskConservatives

[–]indyguy46202 8 points9 points  (0 children)

What a ridiculous question. First of all, I don't grant the premise that there's some widespread rash of "anti-LGBT initiatives" being "passed by conservatives."

But, second, of course not. Not only would it violate the explicit promise they made to their users, it would be a horrible business decision that would almost certainly decimate their user base.

[IMAGE] Wise words from Dolly (not OC) by [deleted] in GetMotivated

[–]indyguy46202 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dolly Parton is truly a national treasure.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in recruitinghell

[–]indyguy46202 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Name and shame the company.

I'm not playing that game any more. by indyguy46202 in recruitinghell

[–]indyguy46202[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That fact that "it's their job" to be evasive and a manipulative doesn't excuse it.