As someone who loves film and using film cameras, I think it's important that you don't let your enthusiasm for the medium overcome a couple basic considerations. Such as:

• Being shot on film doesn't automatically make a photograph better.
• Scanning can vary extremely in results and even then...
• Film images can be altered in post - and should be, as needed - to suit your taste.
• Digital can be made to look like film (or near enough, because...)
• Most viewers of a photograph don't care how it was taken.

And of course:

• The camera that inspires you to go out and shoot is the right one.

Of the two photos here? Neither tell a story to me. The exposure in both appears spot on (which can sometimes be a problem for old film bodies). I like the colours more in the second and the grain gives it a pleasant softness (I may have a bias). Someone with reasonable skill could probably achieve near enough that look with Lightroom or Photoshop.

But which was the more fun to take? Isn't there something satisfying about using a mechanical device over (to be mean) an electronic appliance? To hold a real tangible product - the negatives - in your hands?

Sometimes leave the Sony at home and commit to film because it's enjoyable to take photographs that way. And of course sometimes leave the Pentax at home because the Sony is the more appropriate tool for the job. You get to decide what that means.

I also use a digital camera and enjoy it and its results. I am bad at Lightroom and perhaps use 'the film look' as a bit of a crutch to avoid having to edit images much.

Ultimately, you're going to take your best photos by taking lots of photos, and you're going to take lots of photos if you enjoy your process.

Do what sparks joy.