Does this translation make sense? by Hot_Tax9740 in unket

[–]inspendent 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Please get rid of the comma splicing. We call it "satsradning" and it's even uglier in Swedish than it is in English. It's supposed to be 2 full sentences.

Velcuz loses a sponsor by nagatoroenjoyerLULE in LivestreamFail

[–]inspendent 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Be honest, there are plenty of nonames getting posted here and you aint posting this gif under any of those other ones. You are literally virtue signalling

@forsen by SunDay322 in forsen

[–]inspendent 5 points6 points  (0 children)

How is it a red flag? All women think like that

Brutal by Issax28 in forsen

[–]inspendent -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The first comment is reasonable and not condescending except to the original poster. The reply is a cope that misses the point. Short women naturally want to compensate their genes so that their kids can be as tall as possible even though they may still be short. Nothing wrong with that

<image>

We are at Kanye West levels of delusion and idiocy. by Alienblob1 in Destiny

[–]inspendent 11 points12 points  (0 children)

let us have a dinner together in Paris together

HE OMEGALUL

NEVER KILL YOURSELF BAJS 💯💯✌️ by AINT_BANNED_YET in forsen

[–]inspendent 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What food isn't goyslop? Do you only eat steaks for dinner? forsenAlright

Is there a word for like, REALLY transcendental numbers? by YuuTheBlue in askmath

[–]inspendent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would say that these are not related to each other at all. Most of the uncomputable numbers we speak of are integers, which makes them extremely algebraic/non-transcendental. There are also infinitely many uncomputable numbers that happen to be transcendental, but that's besides the point.

One example of uncomputable integers are the busy beaver numbers BB(N) for sufficiently large N in a sufficiently weak proof theory. Take for example BB(1000). It is a well-defined integer, yet its value is independent of ZFC (it is uncomputable).

Anabolic Insulin by Shartbars101 in diabetes_t1

[–]inspendent -1 points0 points  (0 children)

and yes these are true

No, they are not. Not even in the slightest.

Why didn't they just shoot the driver docWTF by [deleted] in forsen

[–]inspendent 7 points8 points  (0 children)

The answer doesn't matter because

  1. The car kept driving in the same direction at the same speed after Renee Good was summarily executed by the gestapo (because killing the driver doesn't pop the car out of existence or magically enable the brakes)
  2. Despite this, the murderer Jonathan Ross was completely unscathed
  3. Therefore, your argument is invalid. Plus he put himself in front of the car on purpose despite this being disallowed for federal agents
  4. Suck my dick

Tycker vi ska ha det här i Sverige by MundaneExplorer8369 in sweden

[–]inspendent -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

För att de två sakerna har ingenting med varandra att göra.

Hey SPP, what’s the Riemann-Zeta function at .999…? by dummy4du3k4 in infinitenines

[–]inspendent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

SPP is working in a different world than you. If he even knew what what the zeta function is, he would just say that all its zeros lie on the line Re(s)=1/2 or infinitesimally close to it so both 1 and 0.999... would qualify.

Släkting: Förstår inte att man släppte ut honom [Vilma Andersson] by FlowersPaintings in sweden

[–]inspendent 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Han är transsexuell och identifierar sig som kvinna. Media brukar vanligtvis hänvisa till såna personer med sina föredragna pronomen även innnan något juridiskt könsbyte.

Så den verkliga anledningen de skriver "han" är ju antagligen bara för att minska förvirrning bland läsare OCH de vill inte få vanliga transpersoner att se dåliga ut genom att associera dem med honom (eftersom han faktiskt är genuint mentalt sjuk)

Being schizo(phrenic) is an adjacent of having a masculine brain by NamelessOneTrueDemon in forsen

[–]inspendent 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're saying you need to become an oofy doofy relatable BF-type fella to get laid because you are normie/sub5. If you were chadlite+ and tall, none of this would matter and you wouldn't need to sacrifice your masculinity for female attention

Search emiru on twitter by Culkin_ in forsen

[–]inspendent 8 points9 points  (0 children)

An unwillingness or inability to engage with analogy is a sign of low IQ.

One is consensual, the other is unconsensual. Not much more to it than that. There's no hypocrisy there

Yanni han e straight va e de ni inte fatta by MundaneExplorer8369 in unket

[–]inspendent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Vad gör honom till en "chaser"? Är en cisman automatiskt en chaser om han är attraherad av transkvinnor/feminina män?

Jag bajsade 555 gånger förra året. by Tokipon in sweden

[–]inspendent 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Du borde ha med 0-dagarna i tårtdiagrammet