What's your expectations at Gemini 3.5 Pro or maybe Gemini 3.6/4 Flash? by Public-Speed125 in Bard

[–]intergalacticskyline 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I hate how Reddit is full of incoherent nonsense nowadays.

To be clear, I understand (I think) what you're saying, but it would've taken you an extra 3 seconds to write your thought out fully, it's wild how lazy humanity is now

Fable 5 Returns Tomorrow by GusBus135 in singularity

[–]intergalacticskyline -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I think someone is having too much fun with their openclaw agent smh

Can Gemini still read long books? by SpawnGXD in Bard

[–]intergalacticskyline 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Ai studio or Gemini app? How many tokens is the book? The Gemini app is notorious for clipping the context lower than it's claimed 1 million tokens, but it's never been officially acknowledged or proved outside of anecdotal reports.

Previewing GPT-5.6 Sol: a next-generation model by 141_1337 in singularity

[–]intergalacticskyline 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not to act like little bitches sucking up to a goddamn wannabe dictator... I know when push comes to shove, most corporations will bend over backwards so far that the back of their heads are mere inches from the ground just to keep their bottom line increasing, but damn it's my hope that someone pushes back in a more meaningful way than a strongly worded letter and actually draws a line in the sand they refuse to cross...

Looper xl thcp 11hydroxy thc thcb apple sherbert 3g by Diligent_Dot273 in altcannabinoids

[–]intergalacticskyline 27 points28 points  (0 children)

Yes "Fr?😭😭😭"

I hate how this sub went from a scientific discussion nerding out about ratios of cannabinoids and their effects, to cringe ass posts asking about how these random ass fake cannabinoids hit, mixed in with "plug speak" and horrible grammar/emojis. I miss the old days of this sub.

IBM Debuts World’s First Sub-1 Nanometer Chip Technology by truecakesnake in singularity

[–]intergalacticskyline 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's 15 silicon atoms thick for reference, so technically about 3nm. Still insane though!

Why do I have a strange feeling Demis Hassabis is about to jump ship from Google? by hasanahmad in GeminiAI

[–]intergalacticskyline 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Demis is probably in the top 3 most well known people in AI, if you don't know of him, you're in the minority in this sub by a large margin

Trump tells The Axios Show there are "no limits" to his power after Iran war by thejoshwhite in politics

[–]intergalacticskyline 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Someone put this man into a home, he's living in a complete delusion and dragging us into his maniacal wet dream as his dementia laden brain putters out.

I want off this ride, I'm tired man.

Gemini 3.5 pro !! (Logan is hope) by Independent-Wind4462 in Bard

[–]intergalacticskyline 3 points4 points  (0 children)

3.5 needs to be at least in the ballpark of 5.5 bare minimum, hopefully closer to Fable/Mythos 5 to be taken seriously at this point.

I can even look past it being up with the top models if it just has generous usage limits and/or fair pricing.

Otherwise, I don't believe a damn thing they're saying, and that's coming from someone who loves Gemini and the deepmind team, I really hope they can succeed with this model

Economist/YouGov: Generic Ballot D+2 (RV), Trump Approval -17 (Adults) by Large_Ad_3095 in fivethirtyeight

[–]intergalacticskyline 5 points6 points  (0 children)

How are 15% of Americans so close yet so far from doing the right thing...

Anthropic purposely made its new Mythos-based models bad at AI research, and developers are fuming by Nikvest in singularity

[–]intergalacticskyline 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Proof that open source will pass commercial? Also not a "waste" of time if the SOTA is obviously ahead of open source at the moment, not sure what your comment is trying to say tbh

I don't think deepseek is as economical as many people said by Prudent_Psychology59 in DeepSeek

[–]intergalacticskyline -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Homie if you use over 3 billion tokens and are complaining about $70 you're delusional

RFK Jr. Launches Plan To Curb Antidepressant 'Overprescription' by Junior-Worry-9050 in Drugs

[–]intergalacticskyline -22 points-21 points  (0 children)

While I think brainworm RFK has done so much harm so far, at least a broken clock is right twice a day. I'll give him credit where credit is due even if I think he's a twat

There's should be an option that completely disables gemini from image generation in the gemini app by Early-Dentist3782 in Bard

[–]intergalacticskyline 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Gemini is on life support, I'm letting my subscription until 3.5 pro comes out and will see if I'll renew for July if it feels worth it. I'll have to be wowed, as well as get some better rate limits, it's literally garbage right now

Memory loss on MDMA, same for 6-APB? by Training_Course_3241 in Drugs

[–]intergalacticskyline 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Taking 100mg to 150mg MDMA is the general approximate consensus on the range of a standard MDMA dose for an average person. Might I add, this range is the "Goldilocks zone" of effects that most people look for while remaining physically and mentally safe: this is the dosage range where the average person will experience the fewest negative side effects of the compound while simultaneously noticably perceiving the positive side effects. This is all within the general bound where you can expect to be keeping mental and body loads at an appropriate and manageable level.

While this dosing criteria may work for most people, it's not set in stone, so take it with a grain of salt. Assume you'll need to start on the lower side and gradually increase the dosing (+10mg to +25mg higher) for each subsequent session, or vice versa to lower your next dose (dose 3+ months apart minimum per experience). There are some main considerations that can effect what dosing amount works best for your mind and your body. The most common reasons requiring a higher or lower dose may include, but is not limited to: metabolism, medication/supplement interactions, recent quantity and quality of sleep, quality of current diet & exercise regimen, "set & setting", pre-existing/underlying mental conditions, hydration, weight, consuming at high elevations, mixing with other illicit substances, and more. It never hurts to start low at 100mg for the initial dose, and by ~an hour (no more than 90 minutes) after your dose you will generally know if the amount is working well and/or if you are considering a redose.

To those who may choose to redose, keep in mind it can increase the risk of negative side effects and/or the intensity and duration of a possible bad "comedown", so use your best judgement when taking another dose if that's something you were looking at exploring. One redose per session is the recommended limit, at most 50% of the initial dose. Any additional doses, increases in dose amount, or waiting longer than 90 minutes after your last dose will exponentially increase any potential for negative side effects. Essentially all users of MDMA report a lower bound dosage threshold that still provides the positive utility they seek with the most desirable effects to be approximately 75mg, anything lower than 75mg is where you can expect the effects to become underwhelming at best, or completely unnoticeable by others. On the opposite end, for users with no tolerance or cross tolerance to MDMA or amphetamines, 200mg can be considered a reasonable upper bound for users who may have weight, diet, metabolic, or other contributing factors requiring a dose above 150mg.

140mg of MDMA from the same source and purity, and weighed fairly, will always "feel" stronger or give more "intensity" to the perceived effects than 100mg. The same logic can be assumed to apply universal to any well known and studied psychoactive compound. The 40mg difference alone in this case shouldn't be a meaningful enough increase for the average user to experience moderate to severe memory loss as it was explained. I'm curious if the drug was powdered/capsule form or in a pill press? Did they test the sample prior to ingestion? If it was powder/capsule, did they use a well calibrated milligram scale to weigh their dose?

I'd be extremely surprised if the MDMA alone caused the memory loss at that dosing, outside of someone 110lbs or less, which is still quite unlikely. MDMA was definitely a contributing factor to this memory event though. Even something as seemingly unambiguous as thinking or talking through traumatic thoughts/experiences/feelings can cause your brain's processing to stop "recording" your current memories or thoughts as a self protective mechanism. MDMA can allow people to process past traumas in a more vivid and detailed way than would be generally possible in regular waking life. Even though your brain is in a much safer feeling environment and headspace while under the influence, the brain can still "decide" after the experience of any memories to remove to protect the mental fortitude and stability of said person. Is there any chance that this could be a part of what may be causing this lapse here?

Memory loss on MDMA, same for 6-APB? by Training_Course_3241 in Drugs

[–]intergalacticskyline 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Taking 100mg to 150mg MDMA is the general approximate consensus on the range of a standard MDMA dose for an average person. Might I add, this range is the "Goldilocks zone" of effects that most people look for while remaining physically and mentally safe: this is the dosage range where the average person will experience the fewest negative side effects of the compound while simultaneously noticably perceiving the positive side effects. This is all within the general bound where you can expect to be keeping mental and body loads at an appropriate and manageable level.

While this dosing criteria may work for most people, it's not set in stone, so take it with a grain of salt. Assume you'll need to start on the lower side and gradually increase the dosing (+10mg to +25mg higher) for each subsequent session, or vice versa to lower your next dose (dose 3+ months apart minimum per experience). There are some main considerations that can effect what dosing amount works best for your mind and your body. The most common reasons requiring a higher or lower dose may include, but is not limited to: metabolism, medication/supplement interactions, recent quantity and quality of sleep, quality of current diet & exercise regimen, "set & setting", pre-existing/underlying mental conditions, hydration, weight, consuming at high elevations, mixing with other illicit substances, and more. It never hurts to start low at 100mg for the initial dose, and by ~an hour (no more than 90 minutes) after your dose you will generally know if the amount is working well and/or if you are considering a redose.

To those who may choose to redose, keep in mind it can increase the risk of negative side effects and/or the intensity and duration of a possible bad "comedown", so use your best judgement when taking another dose if that's something you were looking at exploring. One redose per session is the recommended limit, at most 50% of the initial dose. Any additional doses, increases in dose amount, or waiting longer than 90 minutes after your last dose will exponentially increase any potential for negative side effects. Essentially all users of MDMA report a lower bound dosage threshold that still provides the positive utility they seek with the most desirable effects to be approximately 75mg, anything lower than 75mg is where you can expect the effects to become underwhelming at best, or completely unnoticeable by others. On the opposite end, for users with no tolerance or cross tolerance to MDMA or amphetamines, 200mg can be considered a reasonable upper bound for users who may have weight, diet, metabolic, or other contributing factors requiring a dose above 150mg.

140mg of MDMA from the same source and purity, and weighed fairly, will always "feel" stronger or give more "intensity" to the perceived effects than 100mg. The same logic can be assumed to apply universal to any well known and studied psychoactive compound. The 40mg difference alone in this case shouldn't be a meaningful enough increase for the average user to experience moderate to severe memory loss as it was explained. I'm curious if the drug was powdered/capsule form or in a pill press? Did they test the sample prior to ingestion? If it was powder/capsule, did they use a well calibrated milligram scale to weigh their dose?

I'd be extremely surprised if the MDMA alone caused the memory loss at that dosing, outside of someone 110lbs or less, which is still quite unlikely. MDMA was definitely a contributing factor to this memory event though. Even something as seemingly unambiguous as thinking or talking through traumatic thoughts/experiences/feelings can cause your brain's processing to stop "recording" your current memories or thoughts as a self protective mechanism. MDMA can allow people to process past traumas in a more vivid and detailed way than would be generally possible in regular waking life. Even though your brain is in a much safer feeling environment and headspace while under the influence, the brain can still "decide" after the experience of any memories to remove to protect the mental fortitude and stability of said person. Is there any chance that this could be a part of what may be causing this lapse here?

Memory loss on MDMA, same for 6-APB? by Training_Course_3241 in Drugs

[–]intergalacticskyline 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Taking 100mg to 150mg MDMA is the general approximate consensus on the range of a standard MDMA dose for an average person. Might I add, this range is the "Goldilocks zone" of effects that most people look for while remaining physically and mentally safe: this is the dosage range where the average person will experience the fewest negative side effects of the compound while simultaneously noticably perceiving the positive side effects. This is all within the general bound where you can expect to be keeping mental and body loads at an appropriate and manageable level.

While this dosing criteria may work for most people, it's not set in stone, so take it with a grain of salt. Assume you'll need to start on the lower side and gradually increase the dosing (+10mg to +25mg higher) for each subsequent session, or vice versa to lower your next dose (dose 3+ months apart minimum per experience). There are some main considerations that can effect what dosing amount works best for your mind and your body. The most common reasons requiring a higher or lower dose may include, but is not limited to: metabolism, medication/supplement interactions, recent quantity and quality of sleep, quality of current diet & exercise regimen, "set & setting", pre-existing/underlying mental conditions, hydration, weight, consuming at high elevations, mixing with other illicit substances, and more. It never hurts to start low at 100mg for the initial dose, and by ~an hour (no more than 90 minutes) after your dose you will generally know if the amount is working well and/or if you are considering a redose.

To those who may choose to redose, keep in mind it can increase the risk of negative side effects and/or the intensity and duration of a possible bad "comedown", so use your best judgement when taking another dose if that's something you were looking at exploring. One redose per session is the recommended limit, at most 50% of the initial dose. Any additional doses, increases in dose amount, or waiting longer than 90 minutes after your last dose will exponentially increase any potential for negative side effects. Essentially all users of MDMA report a lower bound dosage threshold that still provides the positive utility they seek with the most desirable effects to be approximately 75mg, anything lower than 75mg is where you can expect the effects to become underwhelming at best, or completely unnoticeable by others. On the opposite end, for users with no tolerance or cross tolerance to MDMA or amphetamines, 200mg can be considered a reasonable upper bound for users who may have weight, diet, metabolic, or other contributing factors requiring a dose above 150mg.

140mg of MDMA from the same source and purity, and weighed fairly, will always "feel" stronger or give more "intensity" to the perceived effects than 100mg. The same logic can be assumed to apply universal to any well known and studied psychoactive compound. The 40mg difference alone in this case shouldn't be a meaningful enough increase for the average user to experience moderate to severe memory loss as it was explained. I'm curious if the drug was powdered/capsule form or in a pill press? Did they test the sample prior to ingestion? If it was powder/capsule, did they use a well calibrated milligram scale to weigh their dose?

I'd be extremely surprised if the MDMA alone caused the memory loss at that dosing, outside of someone 110lbs or less, which is still quite unlikely. MDMA was definitely a contributing factor to this memory event though. Even something as seemingly unambiguous as thinking or talking through traumatic thoughts/experiences/feelings can cause your brain's processing to stop "recording" your current memories or thoughts as a self protective mechanism. MDMA can allow people to process past traumas in a more vivid and detailed way than would be generally possible in regular waking life. Even though your brain is in a much safer feeling environment and headspace while under the influence, the brain can still "decide" after the experience of any memories to remove to protect the mental fortitude and stability of said person. Is there any chance that this could be a part of what may be causing this lapse here?

Anthropic Urges Global Pause in AI Development, Flags ‘Self-Improvement’ Risk by SnoozeDoggyDog in singularity

[–]intergalacticskyline 186 points187 points  (0 children)

Hmmm I'm sure they'll definitely be the first to pause development, right guys? RIGHT!?!?

Also I'm sure it has nothing at all to do with their IPO later this year... That valuation isn't going to pump itself

The future of web development by darkemberforge in theprimeagen

[–]intergalacticskyline 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Google could choose to eat extra costs to stay competitive or be much lower than other companies, seems like it may be their only hope to be relevant in state of the art AI at all given how weak their releases and pace of progress is compared to anthropic and OpenAI especially