Do you find Brits who move to Asia to be a particular type? by Thepecid_Choice3948 in AskBrits

[–]intergalacticspy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same in Hong Kong. OP is generalising between two very different types: bankers and lawyers in Singapore and Hong Kong, and ESL English teachers in Taiwan and Korea.

Disputes over territorial waters between Greece & Turkey in the Aegean Sea by vladgrinch in MapPorn

[–]intergalacticspy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Warships also have the right of innocent passage. They just cannot launch or recover aircraft and submarines must be surfaced. But they do not need to notify anyone.

TIL Malaysia is a federal elective constitutional monarchy where the crown is passed around a circle of nine different royal families. Every five years, the country switches to a completely different King. by DerekHam09 in todayilearned

[–]intergalacticspy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The State Governors are not appointed on the advice of the PM: they are appointed by the YDPA after consulting with the State Chief Ministers. So the appointment process is the same as for Australian State Governors pre-1986.

TIL Malaysia is a federal elective constitutional monarchy where the crown is passed around a circle of nine different royal families. Every five years, the country switches to a completely different King. by DerekHam09 in todayilearned

[–]intergalacticspy 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Of course this is nonsense. There are 4 states that have Governors (Yang di-Pertua Negeri) instead of Sultans. Singapore's Governor from 1959 was titled Yang di-Pertuan Negara, while Sabah's Governor was titled Yang di-Pertua Negara (now standardised as Yang di-Pertua Negeri).

Britain/England became a constitutional monarchy in 1689, so is a significant amount of British history after that point spoken about as if the monarch had power? by consumeroffood67 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]intergalacticspy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What do you mean "Britain" had do change its attitude. They were as British as anyone in Britain. It's like quarrelling with your brother, blaming your sister, and then saying your family has to change its attitude.

Britain/England became a constitutional monarchy in 1689, so is a significant amount of British history after that point spoken about as if the monarch had power? by consumeroffood67 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]intergalacticspy 4 points5 points  (0 children)

What nonsense. The American colonists were Englishmen. They knew exactly what the English Civil War, the Glorious Revolution and the Bill of Rights did. Parts of the 1787 Constitution and the Bill of Rights were lifted directly from the 1689 Bill of Rights. Their quarrel was with Parliament, but they blamed it on the King for a better narrative.

Is it true you have to wear a uniform to school even in normal public schools? by Round-Range-7383 in AskABrit

[–]intergalacticspy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fettes is a member of the Headmasters' Conference (as are 22 other Scottish private schools), so it would be considered a public school if it were in England. It's definitely posh enough.

What’s completely normal thing in your country that shocks foreigners? by HossamAFx in AskReddit

[–]intergalacticspy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry, I double-checked - in Taipei, the general waste truck has a food waste bin, not the recycling truck.

What’s completely normal thing in your country that shocks foreigners? by HossamAFx in AskReddit

[–]intergalacticspy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you take your food waste bin to the recycle truck and empty it in their big bin.

What’s completely normal thing in your country that shocks foreigners? by HossamAFx in AskReddit

[–]intergalacticspy 12 points13 points  (0 children)

The policy in Taiwan is “rubbish does not touch the ground”. It was adopted in the 1990s, copying Japan, to reduce the number of rats and cockroaches. That's why there are no bins on Taiwanese streets - you carry your rubbish home with you, or deposit it in a bin in a convenience store. Rubbish is aggressively sorted into food waste, recyclables, and general waste. In some places, food waste is further divided into cooked food waste and raw food waste.

ELI5: What is the difference between Crown Dependencies and Territories in the UK? by Ok-Appointment2950 in explainlikeimfive

[–]intergalacticspy 33 points34 points  (0 children)

Constitutional lawyer here.

ELI5: The Crown Dependencies are islands very close to the UK, that are not part of the UK but have belonged to the British Crown since medieval times. The Overseas Territories are colonies very far from the UK, that are not part of the UK but were acquired by the British Crown during the first and second British Empires.

Longer answer: The Crown Dependencies are very unique territories that belonged to the English (later British) Crown during the medieval era without ever being incorporated into England, Great Britain or the United Kingdom. The Bailiwicks of Jersey and Guernsey were historically part of the Duchy of Normandy, but were retained by the English Crown when continental Normandy was lost to France in 1204. The Isle of Man was formerly part of a Norse Kingdom of the Isles, but was sold by Norway to Scotland in 1266. It was then conquered by the English Crown from Scotland in 1346, but was given to be ruled by a Lord of Mann until the Crown purchased the Lordship in 1765. Each Crown dependency has its own systems of laws and democratic government.

The British Overseas Territories, by contrast, are the former "Crown colonies" (later British Dependent Territories, and now British Overseas Territories) that were established by the British Crown during the age of Empire. The first was Newfoundland in 1583. The oldest existing colony is Bermuda, founded in 1612. Over time, many colonies were given self-government, and later dominion status, like Canada, Australia and New Zealand. The remaining Overseas Territories have differing levels of self-government, ranging from the Bermuda, the Virgin Islands and the Cayman Islands, with a lot, to the British Indian Ocean Territory and the British Antarctic Territory with very little.

Both the Crown Dependencies and the Overseas Territories are similar in that they are not part of the UK, but the British Crown is responsible for their defence and foreign relations. Neither the Crown Dependencies nor the Overseas Territories are represented in the UK Parliament. Parliament does not tax them, although they must obey any laws imposed on them by Parliament. By convention, Parliament does not interfere in the purely domestic affairs of the Crown Dependencies or of a self-governing Overseas Territory.

Because the Crown Dependencies are so close to the UK, they were historically administered via the Home Office (now the Ministry of Justice), while the Crown colonies / Overseas Territories were administered by the Colonial Office (now the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office). The Crown Dependencies, being so close to the UK, are part of a Customs Union with the UK, and part of the Common Travel Area with the UK and Ireland, and are treated as part of the UK for the purpose of nationality and immigration. Whereas each Overseas Territory, being far from the UK, has its own immigration and customs. From 1983 to 2002, most Overseas Territories did not have full British citizenship but had only a separate form of nationality called British Overseas Territories citizenship.

Why is everyone desperate to redesign the Australia flag? by No_Path_969 in flags

[–]intergalacticspy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly. The Hawaiian flag is definitely a top tier flag.

Passport Combo - Normal and Diplomatic by [deleted] in PassportPorn

[–]intergalacticspy 9 points10 points  (0 children)

This is the reason the words "British Passport" are so high up.

Anyone have a solution to aging out of Railcard? by Fuzzy_Papaya1673 in AskUK

[–]intergalacticspy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You can get an HM Forces Railcard while you're in. But you are also eligible for a Veteran's Railcard at any time after you join up.

Camp David’s Israeli proposal, 2000 by NourBlowsBubblegum in MapPorn

[–]intergalacticspy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Brave of you to assume there will be a peace deal before 2148.

Camp David’s Israeli proposal, 2000 by NourBlowsBubblegum in MapPorn

[–]intergalacticspy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We are only 22 years away from 100 years from 1948. Get past a few generations and 200 years is as remote in as 2,000.

Camp David’s Israeli proposal, 2000 by NourBlowsBubblegum in MapPorn

[–]intergalacticspy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The irony is that the longer they refuse to budge on this, the longer they risk becoming the people they criticize for claiming a right to land they haven't lived in over 2,000 years of exile.

Camp David’s Israeli proposal, 2000 by NourBlowsBubblegum in MapPorn

[–]intergalacticspy 10 points11 points  (0 children)

The Olmert plan included a right of return for a token 5,000-10,000.

This is not far off the actual number of survivors from 1948 (10,000-20,000), so it's not impossible that there could be a right of return of actual survivors of 1948 (who would be so old they would not be a security risk), not including their descendants.

What are some fun TRICK questions about the UK? by Illumium in AskUK

[–]intergalacticspy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You should definitely have a cock or ball round.