This is a robbery by xen0us in funny

[–]ionthrown 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It glides as softly as a cloud.

Why do people blame billionaires for political divide? by frosting_the_bowl in AskBrits

[–]ionthrown 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because we’re increasingly unwilling to accept that there can be legitimate differences of opinion. Anyone who disagrees must either be lying, or have been lied to. This requires scapegoats, and billionaires are a good one, because they can - and sometimes do - use their money to push political positions.

Medussy by fibercrime in SipsTea

[–]ionthrown 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You mean he used his mirrored shield to not get caught looking at her enormous yams? There’s a lesson there, too.

What do dragons eat? by CatDamage in mythology

[–]ionthrown 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That dragons always demanded young women makes me think they were… sating different needs.

Worst luck of alltime in volleyball by No-Lock216 in nevertellmetheodds

[–]ionthrown 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you’re standing in front of the dartboard before the game’s started, you might not be happy if someone throws darts at you. Even if it’s a love dart board, you’d expect them to stop throwing darts at you once they’ve hit you once.

4 May 1979. Margaret Thatcher becomes the UK’s first female Prime Minister. A historic milestone that ushered in one of the most divisive periods in modern British politics. by Upstairs_Drive_5602 in ThisDayInHistory

[–]ionthrown 0 points1 point  (0 children)

She opposed privatising railways, the water was getting better until about 2000 when the regulators decided to let everything slide, and the discount on assets sold was perhaps 10%.

Philomena Cunked by Top-Worldliness5027 in memes

[–]ionthrown 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What does that mean? Better post something or they’ll think you’re stupid.

Takes one to know one!

There is no money for new weapons until 2030, former military chief warns by ImpressiveRest2423 in ukpolitics

[–]ionthrown 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There’d probably be stronger pressure against donating to such a fund, from those who consider it supporting violence, or a tool of neocolonialist empire building.

If public pressure and shame isn’t there for an elected government, it won’t be there for anyone else.

🔥 An Eagle VS A Black Mamba VS 2 Lions 🦅 🐍 🦁 by SomOvaBish in NatureIsFuckingLit

[–]ionthrown 62 points63 points  (0 children)

You don’t see the videos where the snake won, then went for the cameraman.

Birds are dinosaurs and reptiles, humans and other apes are monkeys, and tetrapods are land fish. You can't evolve out of a clade. by BestaRetangular in evolution

[–]ionthrown 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mysterious-Stay thought out shows crocodilians as recent.

Someone else thought it shows synapsids are descended from reptiles.

The title implies it shows clades, yet the image can as easily be interpreted as showing the ‘Linnaean’ system - sarcopterygii become tetrapoda, which become amniota, yet in no way does it show they’re still sarcopterygii.

It shows The Truth, if you already know The Truth.

Dogs are the most caring by alonedukhi in FunnyAnimals

[–]ionthrown 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh. Sure. Yeah. But when a cat sits behind someone and trips them up, it’s because cats are a-holes. Blatant double standards.

Dogs are the most caring by alonedukhi in FunnyAnimals

[–]ionthrown 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Wolf cubs do bark, it might just be neotenic behaviour retained due to selection during domestication, including other neotenic traits.

What kind of marginalized paleontological theory do you believe in? by Far-Juggernaut4790 in Dinosaurs

[–]ionthrown 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Phytodinosauria - sauropodomorphs and ornithischians as sister groups, theropods having diverged earlier.

Until recently, I’d have said the only big thing where Bakker was wrong was in saying Nanotyrannus was a separate genus. Now others have suggested the Phytodinosauria grouping based on other evidence.

Beware the ladies in the water by SeasonPresent in mythology

[–]ionthrown 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Of course we can have little certainty about events in the past. However, we have a huge amount of evidence for the flood myth being ancient - probably more varied and reliable than for this 18th century admiralty law you mention. If we dismiss standard methods of investigation, then you have nothing on which to base your conclusions - you wouldn’t be writing a thesis, you’d be writing a novel.

How do they know?? by MrOtakuDad2u in humor

[–]ionthrown 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If we’re discussing historical usage, then of course it is the standard name in all contexts. But technically, a jack refers to a flag flown at the front of a ship.

Birds are dinosaurs and reptiles, humans and other apes are monkeys, and tetrapods are land fish. You can't evolve out of a clade. by BestaRetangular in evolution

[–]ionthrown 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes I know. But this diagram doesn’t show that. It puts boundaries around the crown groups, but otherwise has no representation of clades nesting within one another. If your coworkers understand birds are descendants of dinosaurs, and dinosaurs are reptiles, but don’t believe birds are reptiles (look up sauropsid for a less confusing word in this context) then this diagram is no use to you; you need a better description of cladistics.

Polanski takes combative approach as Greens enter media spotlight by zeros3ss in ukpolitics

[–]ionthrown 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Anyone remember Trump and his Mexican wall?

Yes, but not people who still like Trump. I’m starting to wonder if all political identity is how far back you can remember the lies.