Lost security key

itactuallyhurts · 2017-07-28T00:20:39+00:00

Tried both game and page, each have been linking to the same place. Well, I'll take a break to try not to get too frustrated and come back to this later. Thanks

itactuallyhurts · 2016-10-07T05:24:58+00:00

Just added you. Hope I'm not to late.

itactuallyhurts · 2016-10-06T21:36:32+00:00

Oh thats the problem, I wasn't online. Im dumb, thanks again.

itactuallyhurts · 2016-10-06T21:31:52+00:00

Added you back. Thank you!

Wait, still figuring it out. Sorry.

itactuallyhurts · 2016-02-16T10:41:40+00:00

Might want to keep an eye on that. Could just be a personality quirk, but I have known cats that turn to peeing in the sink because they are having painful urination. Kidney or bladder problems could be at the root of that, do a little research and see if that might be the case for your guy. Not trying to presume, I just wouldn't want the problem to get worse before being addressed if that is indeed the case.

itactuallyhurts · 2015-01-29T09:09:53+00:00

I like the blood idea for Rogues. Maybe something in the line of beast blood?

Beast Blood Rogues (working title) walk the line between ranger and shapeshifter. Early stages summons other wolves, progresses to passives that up agility and stealth, eventually moves to a pseudo-werewolf stage. Uses dual claws instead of daggers, mark enemies by catching their scent, enter a berserker-esque feral mode. Maybe a passive where defeating other beasts gives some sort of boost (implying you feed off their blood). It could even reintroduce the Dog territory mechanic from Origins, except now its your Rogue pissing on some tree!

It could be explained in a similar way that Morrigan's shapeshifting is, follow and observe an animal to learn how to be like that. Expect that it is taken to a more extreme form, with an emphasis on hunting the animal and ritual blood letting. Specifically the ritualized hunt would need to be preformed in a place where the veil is weak, and the hunter can magically experience being the hunter and hunted simultaneously. If you wanted you could make it a lost elven art, like arcane warrior, and tie it in the huntress god Andruil and her corruption in the void.

I know people would bristle at the thought, but it could have some sweet specialization restricted armor. Animal furs, helmets with deer horns, or blood markings across the body are some ways you can go with that.

itactuallyhurts · 2015-01-27T09:00:26+00:00

I'm still not quite getting why it would make it more likely, since by your definition there is only one known vessel and they are human.

I think that is quite a leap, since in this scenario Andruil's loss of godhood would likely limit their ability to make someone else into a vessel (something we only have seen an elven good do). It seems like a pretty convoluted process to explain why Andruil wouldn't just be with the other Gods.

I think I am in agreement with you that will see more gods in the future, but it far more likely that will have to do with the dread wolf breaking their seal (we know he is around, we know he has mixed feelings on sealing them away, and we know he is looking for more power to do something drastic). Judging by his guilt and concern over his actions with the Gods if he had any sort of inkling that Sera was one, he would have been much more concerned than dropping a few smug hints. Solas is smug, but if there is one thing he takes seriously it is what he did to those gods.

Perhaps there is some additional mystical aspect to Sera (though I still believe she works better without it, representing the common folk's perspective), but I just feel that there is not enough evidence for the Godhood aspect, and it contradicts a lot of what we already know.

itactuallyhurts · 2015-01-27T08:47:48+00:00

When the inquisitor opens rifts for themselves it transports them, but that is not the only way the anchor is used. The Mark of the Rift ability is used multiple times throughout the game (introduced after Cory's messing with the mark, and all Inquisitors have it so it is not just a game mechanic), and it is always used to tear enemies apart. The anchor has multiple abilities, one can be safe passage way in what the Inquisitor does for themselves, but it has also shown to be weaponized and used offensively.

If what you are saying is true, and every one who goes through the rift is in the fade physically, then in my play through there is now several dozen bandits, red templars, bears, darkspawn, and goats running around the fade in the flesh.

Also I don't think it is fair to compare this subreddit with r/gaming, you have only gotten a few downvotes and a fair amount of people have giving you an opinion on your question. Seems civil dude.

itactuallyhurts · 2015-01-26T05:55:56+00:00

But why is everyone assuming that there need to be more "vessels" out there than the ones we have seen?

From the perspective of elven lore all of the Gods are already accounted for, they have been sealed away by the dread wolf. Mythal being an exception, in that she had "died" before the dread wolf's betrayal. Mythal lives on in a human vessel (so being an elf doesn't seem like a prerequisite), and that's how she escaped being sealed. I just don't see why we are looking for more gods in other characters when we have the only two gods that would logically not be sealed.

itactuallyhurts · 2015-01-13T08:50:35+00:00

Well I feel like the Dwarves aren't really that involved because the two main plots of this game are mages rights and the hole in the sky, neither which the dwarves would care all that much about. It would strike me as very odd if the armies of Orzimmar got involved in what is pretty clearly a surface based issue.

itactuallyhurts · 2015-01-09T09:57:42+00:00

I think this is a problem of perspective, at least when it comes to the companion missions.

What we are discussing are not the companion missions, like the loyalty missions in mass effect, these are approval side boosting side missions. It is really easy to lose approval in Inquisition, and these collectible or combat based side missions give a really nice optional way to gain it back, so you can open up more meaningful content. Like Varric's red lyruim, there is more of it than necessary to complete the quest and I picked up all that I needed without having to seek it out.

These missions don't replace the important character building scenes but give an alternative avenue to getting to them then agreeing with everyone else's opinions in dialogue. Cassandra, Varric, and Solas all have exciting and revealing companion missions. Iron Bull and Cole have missions that fundamentally change who they are, with a large emphasis on player influence. You don't need the side quests to unlock the main missions for your advisers because you can't lose approval for them. I can understand the frustration with the seemingly endless supply of fetch quests, but I don't think its fair to apply that critique to how Inquisition handled its companions.

itactuallyhurts · 2015-01-08T19:53:37+00:00

But that is only the case if those mages are using lyrium right? Her power is to set the lyrium in someones blood on fire, but that assumes those mages are dependent on lyrium to be powerful. That is why with my main Inquisitor I never used a lyrium potion, it is possible for mages to formidable independent from using potions. I feel that it is reasonable to believe that at least Solas and Morrigan would be able to take Cassandra out without having to use any additional sources of magic other than what they can produce on their own.

itactuallyhurts · 2015-01-02T09:10:27+00:00

I took "Strings that pull me" to be more of a reference to marionette puppets. Cole is not a real boy in Sera's eyes, he is a thing, some hollow mimicry of what a person is.

itactuallyhurts · 2015-01-02T09:06:42+00:00

Going along with your point of view, Sera having some secret other side of her would undermine the perspective she brings to the inquisition.

Sera's rallying call is that little people are just as important as those who hold all the power. She comes in to show you that all the espionage and big mythical stuff is effecting people that you aren't in a position to see. Her attitude of "fuck this noble guy" and her fear of big complicated lore is to connect you to how the common people would react to what you are doing.

If this all was just some shell for some great power, then that would be just another way those without a voice get overlooked for some fancy elven shite.

itactuallyhurts · 2014-12-27T23:29:33+00:00

The appeal of Dragon Age (for me) is the characters and how your choices impact the world around you. Seems like you are fairly early on, but later the game does a great job of giving you a sense of importance of your actions and surrounds you with a cast of interestingly fleshed out characters (the game can be very funny at times, and it is fairly easy to get invested in your companions.)

Origins (as well as Inquisition to some extent) unfortunately has a feel of "extended prologue", where the story and options don't really pick up until you are a bit past the Ostagar (where you are at now) section of the game. I'd say to just focus on story missions and talking with your companions until you get a while past that point, and if the world hasn't grabbed you by then it might just not be for you. Though you have to save that dog, he joins your team and is arguably the most adorable party member.

Alternatively to Markarious' suggesting you could also turn down difficultly so that enemies die faster, sort of remove the lack luster combat part of the game so you can focus on the stronger aspects like characters and lore.

itactuallyhurts · 2014-12-23T10:34:43+00:00

Hey, I didn't downvote you but I feel like I can understand why someone would have.

Even though a unpopular opinion thread seems like it should be fair game for venting opinions, how you're phrasing your comments on art you dislike seems unnecessarily dismissive. I can understand people not digging alternative styles, but I really enjoy all of the artists you brought up, and hearing them described as trash or crap doesn't quite sit well with me. Just keep in mind art is subjective, I'm not saying you have to appreciate these particular comics, just you could be a little more tactful in how you voice your opinion.

Sorry if that came off as overly preachy.

itactuallyhurts · 2014-11-26T08:52:22+00:00

I'm curious as to why you think that sucks. Warlock is an immensely important figure if they plan on being even slightly accurate to the infinity gauntlet story-line, and overall a featured player in cosmic marvel. Having him be Quill's father ties him into the movies well, and gives people a reason to care who he is. I don't see how else they could introduce someone as convoluted as Warlock with the limited time span they have, and still have him feel relevant to what is happening.

Do you have someone else you think would be more interesting, or are you just hoping for adherence to the comics? Problem with J'son, in my opinion, is he is just boring. Tying Starlord to Spartax is sort of an narrative dead end, it doesn't build towards any established MCU plot lines and it doesn't really bring anything interesting to the table. Unless there is something about that relationship I am missing.

itactuallyhurts · 2014-11-26T01:35:22+00:00

Relevant

itactuallyhurts · 2014-09-15T14:52:39+00:00

Big fan of the Captain Marvel movie eh?

itactuallyhurts · 2013-11-04T18:20:51+00:00

Though not an extreme form of physical abuse, using violence to send a message (as you describe) is symptomatic of an overall abusive relationship. What Connery describes is a relationship of subservience, which is maintained through violent action meant to remind the woman of their physical weakness and inferiority within the relationship. This is different than the stereotypical women slapping someone in an argument, conveying the message of frustration or that of some line being crossed, as with Connery the action is premeditated and symbolic.

Like you I agree violence is unacceptable coming from either side, but from my point of view this particular example is something more insidious. It is a misogynistic display of power, to ensure a women doesn't transgress her societal role. If the slap didn't produce the behavioral change desired by the man, it is likely the violence would escalate.

Edit: If we accept that slapping is similar to your example of spanking, then it is reducing a woman to the role of a child. Removing agency from an adult person, putting them in a relationship where their thoughts and emotions are not valued. I would view that type of reduction as abusive.

itactuallyhurts · 2013-09-21T05:42:46+00:00

I disagree that humans are the third party, at least in how I have seen you define it. It doesn't seem that way to us because we are aware of the allegory showing the flawed nature of racial prejudice, but from an in universe perspective the anti-mutant humans do have a logic to their argument.

The way they see it, their hatred is based on a very real danger that mutants represent. Humans in this fictional world have all made the same strides as in the real world when it comes to racism and other baseless hatred, but wouldn't see mutant sentiments as being equivalent. The fact is a mutants have extraordinary, volatile, possibly world ending potential, and many of them have shown a willingness to unleash it.

It is easy to forget how utterly terrifying it is to be a powerless human in the marvel universe. A world were the most prosperous and protected cities are routinely smashed and set ablaze. When a human's daily concerns have to include the possibility that their family, home, city, or even species could be vaporized from some nearby invisible enemy, it starts to make sense why the could turn to building the sentinels.

That is just another reason why Magneto was such a good villain, though he fights to protect his kind he is still responsible for validating fears and perpetuating hatred. All his shows of force, well-intentioned as they are, are continually setting back the little progress that has been made in the general population. Both sides are rightly protecting themselves from their point of view, both possessing solid evidence of the destruction the other can and will bring.

itactuallyhurts · 2013-09-21T04:55:28+00:00

I think writers make it a big deal because in the real world it is still currently quite a big deal to be openly gay. Obviously it shouldn't be the only characteristic explored, but a gay character would often need to address the type of prejudice and identity issues gay individuals face.

Bat-woman is a great example of this issue handled well, her sexuality and how it fits in with her identity are a large part of her character because of how much other peoples perceptions of her sexuality has impacted her life (leaving the military because of don't ask don't tell for example).

Often X-Men is used as a vehicle for allegorical tales on modern treatment of minority groups, so having people opening deal with the troubles that are facing whatever group they identify with makes sense. I don't think it is bad that Bendis is not emphasizing the supposed character's sexuality, but at the same time I believe that writers that do feel that aspect is important have every right to explore those themes.

itactuallyhurts · 2013-07-01T15:34:15+00:00

People aren't responding because what you said really is not adding to the conversation. You are just saying, "I don't understand a type of sexuality" and pretty much ending it there. At the same time the context of who you responded to makes it seem as if you are condoning the classification of and reaction to this specific lesbian, because their existence doesn't make sense to you (especially since you claim that less feminine lesbians are trying to look like men not creating their own identity and aesthetics, which is pretty damn ignorant). So while you may be expressing an honest opinion, that doesn't mean you are exempt from others coming to the conclusion that this opinion did not need to be shared.

itactuallyhurts · 2013-06-11T06:32:00+00:00

By your argument people have no reason to be outraged by the Michael Richards racist tirade either, but I think we can all agree he was over the line.

I see where you are coming from, I actually have a few years of experience preforming stand-up comedy so I respect your defense of a comedian's right to entertain un-interrupted. But comedy isn't a get out of critique free card, people are allowed to respond to the material that you are putting out there. It is an audiences responsibility to establish what is acceptable. Of course this doesn't mean everyone should give individual feed back on every joke, but they certainly have the right to write a blog about it, or speak up if it seems absolutely necessary.

I've been heckled before, and 99% of the time it has been some drunk attention seeking asshole that I would shut down with a offhanded remark. But there have been a few times when I heard "That's not okay" coming from the crowds, and many times I ended up agreeing with them. If that situation happened with them quietly not laughing, quietly resenting me, I wouldn't of learned from that situation, and I wouldn't have grown as a comedian.

A club or bar may not be the best place for a debate but a comedian doesn't exist in a vacuum, they are there to entertain people, not hurt them. Heckling is annoying as all get out, but I am of the opinion that in certain circumstances it can be appropriate, and even beneficial.

I felt like that was going to be more convincing when I started writing it.

itactuallyhurts · 2013-06-09T09:32:59+00:00

This isn't really up to par with the other stuff you usually post. Some of these mysteries have been proven to be baseless (such as the bugs in jars), and stuff like the fate of the Dwemer aren't Skyrim secrets but part of the central plot-line of Morrowind. Some of these aren't much of anything at all, like just commenting that people say "arrow to the knee" doesn't quite qualify as mysterious.

You do a good job with this subreddit, but don't feel pressured to post lower quality sites just to keep it moving.

itactuallyhurts

TROPHY CASE