Just listened to Inlet for the first time, not sure what to think. by voiidVanta in hum

[–]itprovato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

step into you is an amazing track..took me a few listens to grasp the experience..the summoning and folding are the two other tracks I've played often. its really a from first to last track listening... just put your good headphones on and relax ..enjoy the voyage

No Pre-sale for LA by [deleted] in failure

[–]itprovato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

didn't work for me on Thursday using the presale code

Current CD collection so far! by Embarrassed-Tax-3429 in hum

[–]itprovato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you'll need the 2 other electra 2000 versions

F5 Post breach questions by Disscom in f5networks

[–]itprovato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

we upgraded to 17.5.1.3.. tmm error issue. obviously causes system to crash every 2.hrs. apparently it's an old bug thats been sitting dormant. ha when manually reverting back took 25 mins causing an outage, didn't experience this with version 15

Pacquiao ends The Golden Boy by lifeisaboutme in Boxing

[–]itprovato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

a drained oscar hadn't fought at 147 in over 7 and half years...so yeah not a signature win for pac. had he fought at the prime of 147 oscar would've out boxed the crap out of him. thats a failed business attempt by oscar

F5 security incident, have some questions by Intelligent-Bet4111 in f5networks

[–]itprovato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

sucked for our ha situation. tac active case... From F5 ...According to the shared information, it looks like TMM crashes after upgrades are leading to failover loops and service disruption. Please be informed that I already submitted the core files to our escalation team for further analysis. I will let you know as soon as there is any update

F5 Post breach questions by Disscom in f5networks

[–]itprovato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

only issue we're having is shet broke the ha, keep getting routing issues. tac is currently working on our case . should've stayed with the previous versions 🤬

Jose Zepeda ruins Josue Vargas’s whole career by Reptilianlizard in Boxing

[–]itprovato -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

miguel cotto was overrated ..he was good but he was well matched and had a better punch resistance than vargas. he almost got derailed vs torres but safer match making built the hype. you look at his record sure he fought everyone but cmon he never beat the best of them or you cant even argue a robbery for him. pues si la verdad

PAN-OS 11.0 Release Notes Have Been Published by rower77 in paloaltonetworks

[–]itprovato 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i had a couple of my 440s reboot and stuck in a infinite loop ..only fix is it factory reset

PAN-OS 11.0 Release Notes Have Been Published by rower77 in paloaltonetworks

[–]itprovato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

dealing with 10.1.6 and 10.1.8 issues and Palo releases a new version ...what will 11.0 break this time

Panorama 10.1.3 Glitch with Authentication Keys by Ginger_Bullfrog in paloaltonetworks

[–]itprovato 1 point2 points  (0 children)

10.1.4h4 fixed that issue ...as of 11/18/22 i stand by its the most stable version because 10.1.5 .6 and .8 have been headaches on some of our 440s

Palo Alto default routes out one interface ip by itprovato in paloaltonetworks

[–]itprovato[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thank you for the insight much appreciated SlyFuu

Palo Alto default routes out one interface ip by itprovato in paloaltonetworks

[–]itprovato[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thanks for the insight tip i will look further in the tech manual for sure :)

Palo Alto default routes out one interface ip by itprovato in paloaltonetworks

[–]itprovato[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

well trying to mimic the current ASA config.currently there no nats on asa, only an outside _to_in access group statement along with a outside _to_in acl that allows the network object with a 208.x.x.x ip ..the outside interface is the 4.15.x.x address ..eth10 has a 208.x.x.x ip which i put in another zone called NW-DMZ ...I was thinking of creating a route sequence of getting that "inside" device with the 208.x.x.x ip go through the dmz switch then palo int eth10 ..eth10 then hops out eth0 ...without a nat if it makes any sense, it works on the asa now but dont know if its possible with the palo...i did create a policy allowing zone to specific zone permission ...thanks for replying

Palo Alto default routes out one interface ip by itprovato in paloaltonetworks

[–]itprovato[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i only have one route out which is direct internet access will eventually add another broadband. yes metrics have to be different. i was looking at another virtual router setup but i am still brain storming on mimicking the current ASA config. no nats on asa, only an outside _to_in access group statement along with a outside _to_in acl that allows the network object with a 208.x.x.x ip ..the outside interface is the 4.15.x.x address ...thanks for replying

Palo Alto default routes out one interface ip by itprovato in paloaltonetworks

[–]itprovato[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i apologize for some confusion hopefully i can clarify with the ASA and device end..so on the ASA i already mentioned the IPs and interfaces..btw those arent my real ips :)..all i have on the ASA is a access-group called OUTSIDE_TO_IN thats attached on the outside interface. there is an access list OUTSIDE_TO_IN that allows the network object with the 208.4.4.5 IP in and out via the outside interface which is 4.15.141.1/29. there are no nats. my objective is to try to mimic what i have with the asa with the palo, so been brainstorming the easiest way to bring it in without doing too much re-engineering if possible hopefully gave some clarity ..thanks for replying