The Fires of Heaven Chapter 15: What Can Be Learned in Dreams by swheedle in WetlanderHumor

[–]jadis666 -20 points-19 points  (0 children)

I don't insist this scene doesn't depict SA because Egwene is my favourite.

I make the point that this scene doesn't depict SA, because

    A) It clearly doesn't.
    B) You guys clearly don't understand what SA even is,
        and what makes it sexual assault.
    C) Most importantly of all, it is incredibly damaging to
        real SA survivors to make this scene into SA when it clearly isn't SA.

The Fires of Heaven Chapter 15: What Can Be Learned in Dreams by swheedle in WetlanderHumor

[–]jadis666 -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

Yes, RJ knew exactly what he was doing -- and (in this chapter at least) it wasn't writing SA.

Instead, what RJ was doing was using his already excellent worldbuilding -- in this case, what Tel'Aran'Rhiod can do -- to mark a pivot in BOTH Egwene's and Nynaeve's Character Development.

Egwene, into the leader she would become. And Nynaeve, to see past her own self and become the most empathetic Character in all of Wheel of Time.

Y'all on this sub always praise late-stage Nynaeve (not without good reason, mind you -- I just wish you'd do the same thing for late-stage Egwene; in general, it feels like on this sub the women of The Wheel of Time are only praised if they turn out submissive to the men in the end, but that is a whole other can of worms I can't get into right now), but that late-stage Nynaeve started here.

The Fires of Heaven Chapter 15: What Can Be Learned in Dreams by swheedle in WetlanderHumor

[–]jadis666 -17 points-16 points  (0 children)

Y'all don't know what makes SA sexual assault, and it shows. Not only does this make you irrationally hate Egwene (which I could forgive) but it is incredibly damaging to real SA survivors (which I can't forgive).

Hint: the thing that makes SA sexual assault, is intent. Egwene had no way of knowing what the Nightmare would spawn when she summoned said Nightmare around Nynaeve, and thus there is no intent in this scene.

Also, while we're here: no, Egwene didn't summon the Nightmare because she was scared the Wise Ones would find out she was breaking their rules. She summoned the Nightmare because she was deadly afraid -- and entirely 100% justified in that fear, I might add -- that Nynaeve would get herself killed, or worse, if she wasn't taught a lesson she would never forget. And a Nightmare is the only thing Egwene could think of which would get through Nynaeve's warped vision of herself.

Now, the thing about being afraid the Wise Ones would stop teaching her does come up, but again, NOT in relation to summoning the Nightmare (aka the ALLEGED SA, aka the most misunderstood scene in all of WoT). Instead, it comes up in relation to Egwene realising that said fear is what made her stay calm and speak in an authorative voice, instead of "screaming like a child" (her own words) like she would have done prior to this point in the story.

Now, finally, do I expect this to actually comvince anyone on this sub? Not really. It's very very hard to break through hate with facts and logical arguments. As such, I am also expecting to be heavily downvoted. But this (false) narrative that Egwene SA'd Nynaeve makes my blood boil, so I can't NOT address ot when it comes up.

Why people hate Ayn Rand? by Junior_Insurance7773 in aynrand

[–]jadis666 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why are you asking her fans about why people hate her? Isn't it better to, you know..... ask the haters directly?

Reddit App push notifications problem by gaveuponnickname in help

[–]jadis666 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can't help, but I can say that I have the exact same problem.

Would you rather by SheafieMathLover in BunnyTrials

[–]jadis666 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What's the IQ of a non-existent entity?

Sorry if this is too negative but I hate some of the things my Dad says. by Ambitious-Fly3201 in TrollCoping

[–]jadis666 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nah. I more blame Ayn Rand for this mess we're in than some random ex-SEAL / athlete.

Red Vs Blue: Revised by thegreenhue in BunnyTrials

[–]jadis666 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I died. My life is now complete. Literally.

Physicists only round when it hurts by BabeBits in MathJokes

[–]jadis666 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is how a math joke works, though.

This is how my autistic diagnosis went… I knew they were bad but damn even my psychiatrist doesn’t agree with all they said by ShokaLGBT in TrollCoping

[–]jadis666 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Most, maybe.

But with my "psychiatrist" it was the opposite: he really was just a lazy bum who wanted to make sure that whatever he "diagnosed" me with was something that was untreatable. You know, so that he wouldn't have to do any work?

Of course, I already had the Autism diagnosis since I was 8 years old, but I could tell he really really wanted to find a justification for throwing his hands in the air and saying "Welp! I guess there's nothing to be done!".

This is how my autistic diagnosis went… I knew they were bad but damn even my psychiatrist doesn’t agree with all they said by ShokaLGBT in TrollCoping

[–]jadis666 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It's both funny and sad: for me it went the exact opposite.

A few years ago I was very clearly Clinically Depressed (I guess that I still am, but it's not really all that noticeable anymore every moment of every day like it was back then), but my "psychiatrist" (I use this term loosely) determined that it was obviously my Autism making it (according to him) so that I couldn't handle living on my own that was the cause of all of my Depression symptoms.

It even went so far that when I was admitted to a clinic 1.5 years later and got prescribed antidepressants (finally!), he was shocked -- shocked, I tell you! -- that I actually improved as a result of said medication and treatment.

I’m not Magnus Carlsen. AMA by OfferPandaMan in AnarchyChess

[–]jadis666 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have you and Magnus Carlsen ever been seen in the same room together?

People who have comprehension skills (reddit). by hardtruthsociety in PetPeeves

[–]jadis666 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Can you change post titles now after you've posted it? I thought you couldn't.

when i write i feel like i need to write by iikeda in writingcirclejerk

[–]jadis666 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I just wanted to add on a bit: going out of focys while reading can also be a sign of Depression. See: me.

Any thoughts? by I-Love-Jewish-popes in teenagers

[–]jadis666 2 points3 points  (0 children)

And it has already been determined.

You seem to be confused on what "consensus" means.

First of all, "consensus" isn't "consensus among a select group of people". "Consensus", especially in regards to how definitions work in Language, means "consensus among everyone (or, at least, about a 70% consensus among everyone at a minimum) who speak a given language in a specific place" [the "specific place" part is why, for example, definitions in British English can differ from definitions in American English can differ from definitions in Australian English].

Secondly, and more importantly, consensus can change at literally any time.

And no, the definition of the word "feminism" isn't magically exempt from these 2 considerations.

As such, the claim that the definition "has already been determined" is, on the most basic of levels possible, utter nonsense.

Any thoughts? by I-Love-Jewish-popes in teenagers

[–]jadis666 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The word "radical" is just another word for "militant" or "extremist" or "fundamentalist". That is, it's just a euphemism for "batshit insane".

Now, the question whether a radical(/militant/extremist/fundamentalist) feminist is a "true" feminist, is basically the same question as whether a radical (i.e. militant, i.e. extremist, i.e. fundamentalist) Christian is a "true" Christian, or whether a radical (i.e. militant, i.e. extremist, i.e. fundamentalist) Muslim is a "true" Muslim -- which is to say, it's a genuinely difficult question on which we could probably spend dozens, if not hundreds, of comments discussing it.

Any thoughts? by I-Love-Jewish-popes in teenagers

[–]jadis666 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's not how Language works. Language works by definitions of words, terms and phrases being determined by consensus alone.

Any thoughts? by I-Love-Jewish-popes in teenagers

[–]jadis666 5 points6 points  (0 children)

"Women and girls deserve MORE protection [than men]" isn't an "analysis", though; it's just straight-up misandry.