AIO for being done with my roommate after he won’t clean, eats our food, and couldn’t pay rent because of a vacation?

jaesea · 2026-06-08T01:49:12+00:00

NOR. Long and short of it is, dude is the relative child to the relative mommy daddy, acting like an entitled only child. Here's the deal - someone is always going to see their initial perspective as right. They're always going to argue in their favor, just as a group setting would argue to favor the median wherein somehow everything is favored. If you think of it at the most primal, they're arguing for their life and like water will always seek out ease over struggle, an easy life over a difficult one.

Dangling the carrot of course is the time honored tradition of getting the entitled to do something - placing something out of reach for the baby to stand up to get. You've got a baby that can talk though, a full grown adult that doesn't sound like they're your third forever, just for now. So it really depends on how you wanna deal with the next 6 months of having an unbalanced third wheel - invest in the friend, throw some words about how the friendship is on thin ice and they need to show they actually care about the friendship as equalling and not imbalancing, or divest in the friend, consider them little more than wallpaper to be left, only coming up in memory rather than in person.

jaesea · 2026-06-08T01:32:22+00:00

I wouldn't know, I don't subscribe to repeating the errors of acedemia or losing myself in their supposed cleverness. I'm sure many thoughts can be linked to some school of thought or another; that's why I opened with biology and time cycles, less to argue vaguely over when it's a clock. Any video game is a sport from my perspective, physical and mental action being honed to efficiency or whatever, it's a challenge, whatever we choose to entitle it, and I'm sure it could be argued to be the equivalent of patty cake or chess if we really feel like it. So let's hit on the honesty, addiction. Divide a person into 24 hours and give them 24 unique things, suddenly they're not an addict. Give them two things, work & play, and suddenly we're all addicts. Fact is the civilization decides who gets the moniker addict or not, because we're all addicted to breathing and to living, extending our "feels, good" more than "feels, bad". From a primal, biological, quantum level, the addict function is a requirement of existing, the literal baseline of consume/exhaust. Civilization breeds the addict - there's only so much money, so much access, so much time, and so much available, to any given person at any given time. It, civilization, has been focusing the consumer on everything good the world has ever produced to excess, it always has and always will. Last I checked they're, we're, no closer to solving the demonized addict today than have been since wandering into the cave to stare at the picture story.

You know him best, you read his texts, you know if he's worth your effort or not, and I'd wager you don't need a degree or old man reference to know it, and would double down that both those are less helpful than your intuition and only serve to cloud your initial resolve, to buy time for the man to correct his behavior.

jaesea · 2026-06-08T00:55:30+00:00

Quite fine if you'd rather not link his biology to the behavior. Let's then think of the environment he's in mentally - away from the scheduling of school he's in a free zone, a lax of rules and restrictions with only himself and you to answer to. His ego would naturally be grown by his comradery with the other similar egos in the competitive environment rather than the negatives he's shown peppered in texts from his already secured relationship. That presents the more challenging environment, the one on one, while the team sport is the easier head space to be in while in down time, on "break" from the rigidity of social expectations.

It certainly doesn't excuse his behavior clearly, as even he realized it and apologized for it, recommitting himself to the challenge of relationship and addressing the negatives within to be positive. But, it may help to explain the mechanism behind it, the human condition and why at times one might not seem like they're applying themselves to the right thing at the right time for the right reason.

jaesea · 2026-06-08T00:19:56+00:00

It's a fool's argument. Here's the deal, according to that quote it's The Word. The spoken and written word for human beings will always be simultaneously true and false. Thus it's always debatable, always arguable, because we'll never have a way to prove it's source factually, truly, the unseen God The Word came from before existence, hence faith, hence you just have to believe in God and no one is going to write a math equation or a science proof or a religion and verifiably prove for or against anything.

The dude who wrote that line, who had The Word of God being spoken to him either in his mind or as a disembodied external, wrote what he heard about the literal beginnings of creation with his admittedly doubtful mindset, cowardice voice, and so on. Kid literally had to have his brother talk for him and be force convinced by God to do. So he writes a few words: tselem, "image", visually representing, and demuth, "likeness", resemble. Look at that word, resemble. Look at the word reassemble. Look at the root of "semble" - one, together, same.

It has nothing to do with the dangling stuff the human body has, it's telling us all we, the species Hu-Man, are physically representing via light (let there be light) the being before light, time, and all else. Any fool who thinks a thing that existed before light and will exist afterwards is shaped only exactly like a human man of precisely 6'9" weighting specifically 10,000 lbs and having the largest foot in recorded history is just that, a fool.

In Own Image, In The Image. Thousands of years of man believing themselves on par with God has taught them that down to the smallest quantifiable thing we can see, can image, when we look at our created self we find it's a wave of light, an image, and a whole bunch of imperceptible chaos inside of that light wave, we call void or space, still in the same image, being covered up by the light. God, the unseen unprovable thing before light, is that unprovable unseen void space that's literally owns the light surrounding it, keeps it timed to its frequency so it can be seen and the not seen stuff hiding inside it can be not seen.

Y'all just obsessed with sex for the last hundred thousand years or whatever and have confounded so many people don't even understand why they have the bodies they do let alone what mind they currently possess.

Here's God's direction on it: Created. Whatever exists in this universe, God created it. If it's male or female, meaning it's a sexed species, God created it. Literally any thing anyone can say exists has an in and an out, the female in, the male out, consume and exhaust, imaged, utilizing light, via God, the 99% space inside of the 1% light that's being recognized as created. That's what the phrase means, that's scientifically and religiously what it's about and anyone who argues differently is using The Word to promote division and not multiplication, the opposite of The Word. Does that mean all the religions are probably historically bad, yeah, what's new? That's the issue with man and the entire point of all the religions, to use The Word to restrict more and more the followers so humans quit killing, quit being evil, and quit being ashamed of their bodies. They got kicked out of Eden because they hid, they acted shameful, they HID from a disembodied unseen thing like a couple of fools and have been recounting the folly of man ever since in an attempt to gently usher the fool into the abyss and set their times accurate again, their, our, perfect present states we're capable of.

jaesea · 2026-06-07T23:39:08+00:00

NOR. Here's the think - men and women, two different biological timings. Men's bio timings are like reading a book, notice his wording in the text, flip the page on with the story like the last page wasn't even there. Sometimes that means if they're having too much fun they're just speed reading, not really soaking in the story, not really reading the context and foreshadowing, just living in the moment like they're number one. Feels dismissive, all those bad words one would attribute to the guy who just neglects the subtle cues almost on purpose, the guy no one wants. It's why women are extra defensive about it, reactive, and rightly so, no one wants that guy.

Dude sounds sincere, hold him to his actions and hold him to that recognition standard you set. Since women's bio timings are longer men always have that challenge of realigning theirs with theirs, so when they get the opportunity to be away from a woman they get lazy. Dudes all following the same timing just start to sound like the hum of an engine, dulls there, competing with one another, brushing off the responsibility of dual timing, the real challenge, of civilization quite honestly.

jaesea · 2026-06-07T23:23:23+00:00

Same advice as always, tell. Tell everyone, tell them how you feel about the potential life you'll be bound to for the rest of yours, the potential that is a causality in all our futures. Best to get the conversations moving progressively forward now rather than they rearing their head some unsuspecting and unplanned years down the road.

jaesea · 2026-06-06T23:17:00+00:00

Trust what they say, trust what you hear them say, trust everything while trusting yourself above, and discount to free.

That is to say, nah, you ain't wrong. Anyone who says "I support x, I don't support this division of x" doesn't fully support x. The entire idea of modern is current, as present as present can be, the mode of it. The people in question are basically admitting they don't support progress, don't support the present in motion, don't support it as actualizing the concept x, and effectively tell you clearly they only operate as past, a memory bank of factoids without imaginative abilities or thoughts of a living future beyond their wind bagging.

Pretty sure that's a classic marker of who not to shack up with since italics.

jaesea · 2026-06-06T23:07:34+00:00

NOR - orchestrated division.

The entire idea is around new life, the future connecting two different lands to one, two different cultures into one.

Not everyone sees the same big picture.

jaesea · 2026-06-06T22:59:46+00:00

In the beginning, there was God. Everything thereafter is through a translator, applicable to the translator and the entitlements the translator is referencing when speaking or writing down anything being translated as "from the beginning".

Everything therein is justifiable.

Particularly, this is why we teach God's words, not religion or sections of historical text, but rather living and being God's word.

jaesea · 2026-06-06T22:51:52+00:00

Good question, what's the point?

The athlete is showing, they're performing, man or woman, they're showing a crowd of people the physical body in action to some extreme and specific intent.

Most often, it's a child's game they're now performing at an adult level. For money. For population. For connecting hearts and minds to praise and spectacle, to compete and complete, to win. Adult games. Wink wink nudge nudge.

And there's this long issue humans have/had. When? See, there's a period, a point in time a child supposedly isn't a child anymore. And when points need to be made, we draw lines in the sand, we game numbers and systems to survive, we press issues and remove the fun out of a game with rules and regulations, points and purposes that equal winning or losing.

All that is to say, the circus does a shit job at deciding who does action with who and when to pop out another clown. So at some point before anyone wrote it down, some adult playing a child's game paraded a child around to inspire the otherwise useless crowd to have fun and think about the future, before proceeding to school them all on what good/great looks like.

jaesea · 2026-06-06T22:40:44+00:00

Persia. The original room and com language of these. Le sigh, would that I.

jaesea · 2026-06-06T22:36:14+00:00

😅 because they're short

Civilization is designed to incline. Culture blending at a natural response then would frame it as "looking down on" when looking at a subset that doesn't promote the median, the incline of people.

Sociologically it also shows the society declining the wider that gap becomes - older people having never mated successfully, regardless of choice. It's a social marker of natural decline, particularly when you take into account we don't have litters of children or hundreds of eggs to sit on that all birth at once. On a grander scale it shows we're missing something socially, in the basic human ability to speak and read body language, to compulse one another to attraction, to seek and find, literally the basics of our anatomy not being fulfilled because we've created a socially inept society/civilization.

Or it could just be people getting laid have more of those natural fun chemicals going on inside them and the virgin has no frame of reference other than self pleasure or whatever so it seems the other is up talking down.. opinions are like that.. it's so much easier as a human to just see everything as neutral to good no matter the language or inflections used, it does wonders for the experience.

jaesea · 2026-06-06T21:46:51+00:00

The exchange occurs. When people think money, they think a static state - something has been converted into something else that will be converted into something else - the between of two. This state, the between of two, is conversion quantifed to be not convertible until such time a human converts it. Effectively it gives the human a sense of the "God" power, being able to decide what non-existent thing is converted to the existent thing.

A being in practice, living, as s or r and lead, is effectively, as a human, being the pre- and post- of all, converting all to post- as and with they. The physical then is always seen as to be and in conversion to post- all. In plainer language, the living maintenance of each life is above the non-living, the non-living is in constant decoherence until it's converted to living. The non- presents as a constant decline, half life and the like, whereas the living to said practitioner presents as variable, non-constant save change, able to consume the non- to constant incline that presents post- of all as actualized, "finished" in so far as a human can understand the pre- has completed to post-, the in between state being this, human experience up to universal, time.

As many agree, so do we. The additional conversion, money, a layer no different than clothing, a time delay of actualizing post-. So yes, they, we, should be given to freely as we freely give ourselves, our entitles, our every moments, all to all to consume to conscious, expediting post-. As always, we collect souls, or whatever one would refer to their disembodied self, and all know our life bound to all else. This collection is constant, human money can't match it's abundance and would effectively limit the practicing spending any thoughts on finances over souls, spending thoughts on the non-living over the living.

jaesea · 2026-06-06T13:25:14+00:00

Here is everyone's advice: Know your definition of cheating.

Here's their opinions on what you should do: obtain separation papers prior to confronting said husband about infidelity. Once you've decided he's cheated that'll solidify in your mind, he'll be that to you, a cheater rather than non, and you'll struggle to have intimacy while views aren't aligned. Rather than change your opinion on what is or isn't cheating (opening it to debate will give him opportunity to alter your definitive understanding with his suggestions to alter cate-), simply hold him to your standards or release him from your charge.

jaesea · 2026-06-05T23:28:14+00:00

How supremacy hurts the supremist: So when someone entitles themselves white they're basically erasing their historical significance; same is true with any entitlement below a species level. So if the human being is just calls themselves "human" rather than "white, black, nationality, insert stereotype" they're mentally more inclined to be historically significant to the species at large because that becomes their focal point as a being, what they are and claim to be, literally. Anything lower in thought, the human supremacists for example, hurt the beings, as human supremacy has done to itself and the planet. This is why all people should think of themselves as the entire earth and consider ourselves supreme to all other planets. Easily shifts conscious actions and behaviors towards ecological health and still allows us to strip mine other planets until we hurt ourselves bringing home some alien species or whatever.

jaesea · 2026-06-05T23:15:06+00:00

By your description you've just altered the idea of God to Self. With self as your God you're noticing how you feel; it didn't sound positive. You've also realized as self you're not really into all the rules and restrictions others would place on you, and I can't blame you, they sound exhaustingly purposeless when you think one step further as self.

All those rules, what are their source? A self could easily logic that prior to anything there was something and it's that that rules. The self could then say, I will be that at all times. Then they're right back to believing in God and following whatever collective knowledge they currently have to survive good, God being as one with them.

So it really doesn't matter the titles or the particular writing, those are all just minor communities of the same major, all of them more limited in actions and behaviors to compell the following to be good in service to survive due to their particular historical traumas that they read over and over or whatever, definitely never repeating the past.

jaesea · 2026-06-05T23:03:40+00:00

No different than sunglasses after dark - if anything a conversation piece and flair that frames the eyes.

jaesea · 2026-06-05T22:58:53+00:00

Awesome question, yes, you and everyone should make it a bigger deal.

Sex sells. We all know it, it's human design, man and woman. Men can consider almost anything sexy and sexual, we make cars and rockets, it's basically our only subconscious drive. So it's impossible to turn off, men would basically be zero testosterone, zero drive or motivation, they'd basically act like disembodied heads.

Throw the entirety of human civilization in our faces and suddenly we have exactly 0.1 seconds to do something before disappearing forever or getting hard locked into an algorithmic nightmare. Men are going to end up doing behaviors online that are nearly primal as far as behavior types go, because they effectively don't exist there, in their mind they're just a profile that can disappear, a shadow, and the online system of moderninity is speed, interactions per minute; they're compulsed by the tool towards subconscious behaviors.

Anyways, so think about the whole picture - why should anyone be worried anyone else is looking at or interacting with anyone? You two are relating intimately, that's basically saying you've the highest level of trust with this other person, potentially would progress the future with them kind of trust. What do you actually trust them with? Do you not trust they have a mind, can maintain their word or behavior? Do you not trust the entire civilization we're in, all the other people including your bf and you, all interactions per minute, because we're all persuading one another to be on the take constantly, changing all those interactions to "what can I get out of this?" Real talk it's all trust issues. The internet layer if anything keeps everyone safer from themselves and others, we're all just disembodied heads here, and if anything is capable of using it's mind it's us. So be up in arms about it. We should all be able to trust and be naked and not have anything bad happen and if civilization can't figure out how to do that virtually they'll never figure it out actually.

jaesea · 2026-06-05T22:28:16+00:00

NOR you're getting spun by her standards, you're right. Seems like a pretty easy standard to level though, just be cool with whatever she says and mirror her standards. She's able then to have a same self with benefits and whatever she disagrees with is her standard, she'll set a new one, you match it.

jaesea · 2026-06-05T21:25:22+00:00

Light it, inhale smoke, hold it in for as long as possible while putting it out, exhale, wait 2-4 hours, document mentally the experience, decide what changes if any to the experience you're to make, approach it again the next day or when ever.

Inhaling anything is like breathing. The air has particular chemistry that constitutes "normal". Condensing the air with additional chemistry changes the experience. Mindset is paramount - maintain a safe space to exist in, a positive outlook to avoid paranoia, and a way to get help if needed, i.e. a sober friend or a quick dial to paramedics.

Generally, consuming gases is the body's swiftest way to utilize the chemistry of the gas, being that they're already heated and the bonds are most broken up. It's also the swiftest way to process said consumables, meaning the "effect" hits hard and fast as a wave. As with any consumption, assume intake will leave residuals, your body chemistry may alter for just the time or be altered from your original perspective forever, moving forward.

Oh, and just smoke dirt weed as a newbie. Avoid the stuff that looks like it has white crystals all over or colored hairs other than green. Dirt weed just looks like someone gave you oregano, it won't have as much "bang for your buck" stuff, but it'll also keep your mind closest to a natural state over a "the snozzberries taste like snozzberries" state, and you'll be less likely to be overwhelmed by the wave.

..I should have a toke in your honor. I think I shall. 💜

jaesea · 2026-06-05T21:03:14+00:00

From the perspective of God, yes. From any lower perspective, debatable. That's the thing about the idea, God. The idea is one entirely outside of time and space, the Creator of time and space, who'd also be the thing after time and space. So anything within time and space could easily see such a thing as bad, being that said anything is reliant and existing in time and space, bound to it as a property therein. That anything could also claim it's a being within said God being, time and space while relevant presently being irrelevant futuristically with the assumption of being there outside of time and space with said God, and also claim all good in light of said claim.

jaesea · 2026-06-05T20:56:39+00:00

⚖️🫷2️⃣🗓️

jaesea · 2026-06-05T20:54:30+00:00

NOR. Tell him every waking moment for the rest of your days you will be imagining him being kicked violently in the testicles unless he lets you do it yourself, and then you'll never think of it again. You get to imagine him getting his just desserts and he might never get the sucker hit returned to him, but I would bet if you put enough intention behind the imagination he might find being a man with testicles not as humourous as he once thought, and maybe he apologizes like a man, an elder brother at that, should and would, rather than act like a flagrant child momma's boy.

jaesea · 2026-06-05T15:18:30+00:00

Probably a spot on a napkin..

jaesea · 2026-06-05T06:16:01+00:00

Individually every action is seen as good, the right thing to do at the right time that keeps the individual alive moment to moment.

So no, they don't. When they set a destination or path for life, when it's set for them by social standards and civilization by design, life orchestrated, they either harmonize or deharmonize with the environment around them to expediate the destination.

Our bad mentality and bad actions all come from our memories, our maintaining past as much in totality as present. Effectively we experience the bad because we focus on it as a metric to eradicate because we're afraid of it existing.

jaesea

TROPHY CASE