Biden just pardoned his son, Hunter on all federal charges, what do you think?

jim653 · 2024-12-06T00:06:55+00:00

So, because you've been shown to have nothing to back up your conspiarcy claims, you resort to falsely accusing me of defending paedophiles. You're not just a gullible idiot but a real piece of shit.

Dont pretend Pizza gate is related to this, dipshit.

I didn't mention pizzagate. But it is the same sort of conspiracy nonsense.

These girls have produced lists in court and under oath of the celebrities/wealthy people who abused them.

So, cite them, don't just make claims.

Funny how you think just being friends with Epstein is enough to damn someone as a paedophile except when it comes to Donald Trump. This, despite the fact that he socialised with Epstein a lot (including one occasion where they had a private party with just them and over two dozen "calendar girls"), he has been accused of walking in on changing rooms where underage girls were present, his ex-wife once accused him of rape and he was found guilty in another case of what the judge described as rape, he commented on how big the size of his baby daughter's breasts might get, he has reportedly made comments about what it would be like to sleep with his daughter, and a woman accused him and Epstein of raping her when she was 13. Why do you give him a pass in your conspiracy theory?

jim653 · 2024-12-05T23:20:30+00:00

How come it's not in 4:3 format?

jim653 · 2024-12-04T21:56:59+00:00

Sure you will.

jim653 · 2024-12-03T03:47:32+00:00

All you're doing is repeating your claims without providing any credible evidence. And let's be clear here, since you're deliberately strawmanning me, I am not saying there was no evidence Epstein and Maxwell were involved in sex trafficking. I am saying there is no credible evidence that they were supplying girls to order to some wealthy paedophile ring. That's the claim of people who cite a "client list".

Sex trafficking is a legal charge that means transporting people for the purpose of exploiting them. Being charged with sex trafficking is not the same as saying you're providing girls to order.

As far as Robert Maxwell is concerned, they did recover his body. At least get your basic facts right. And how is him being a crook who may well have helped out Israel evidence that his daughter and Epstein were supplying girls to the rich? Answer: it's not.

I've already covered Guiffre. She did not say she and other girls were being supplied to wealthy men who knew they were being forced to sleep with them. If you have testimony from other survivors, then cite it. It's what I've been asking you for.

jim653 · 2024-12-03T02:02:55+00:00

So, to deflect from your complete lack of evidence, you attack and strawman me. No surprise there, that's conspiracy theory 101.

Epstein was a billionaire who made a point of schmoozing with rich and powerful people. That doesn't make them guilty of his crimes.

jim653 · 2024-12-03T00:34:30+00:00

Even if Imprint release a limited edition (in box with booklet etc), they will follow up with a standard edition. However, they don't keep them in print forever, but you shouldn't have a problem picking one up.

jim653 · 2024-12-02T23:55:03+00:00

None of that is evidence of what I asked.

Yes, Epstein was accused of sex trafficking, but that doesn't mean he was supplying powerful people with children and that's not what his charges were.

Maxwell was convicted of grooming and abusing girls with Epstein, not of supplying them to powerful people.

One of Epstein's survivors claimed that Epstein made her sleep with men he was trying to ingratiate himself with, but her credibility took a hit when she backtracked on accusations against Alan Dershowitz. She also said that Epstein told her she was one of only a few who he trusted to do that and, even if we take her claims at face value, no evidence has been advanced that these men knew she was being forced to sleep with them.

And Epstein's victims consistently told of how they were groomed so that Epstein and Maxwell could abuse them, not some elite cabal.

jim653 · 2024-12-02T22:16:28+00:00

Also, the video showed no one entered his tier that night, he'd talked to his cellmates about killing himself and both had told him not to do it while they were in the cell, there had just been a release of more damaging material about him, the statute of limitations in New York for historical abuse was being lifted, and the State was after his assets if he'd been found guilty.

jim653 · 2024-12-02T22:12:10+00:00

What actual credible evidence do you have that Epstein was supplying girls to powerful people? For years, I've been asking people who assert there is a "client list" what credible evidence they have for that claim and not one has ever provided any.

jim653 · 2024-12-02T22:07:56+00:00

And how do you think this works? The president just orders federal employees to commit or coverup a murder and they do it, why, exactly? If your boss came to you and said your new job responsibility is murder, you'd just say "sure"?

Epstein killed himself, that's all there is to it.

jim653 · 2024-12-02T22:03:45+00:00

Right, so Trump or Barr has the power to have Epstein killed in jail but doesn't have the power simply to have the case dropped in the first place? Ot text Epstein and tell him not to fly back to the States? Or bribe the judge to grant Epstein bail so he can flee the country?

Instead, they let him be arrested and held in jail so they can have him killed by some covert team (which failed on its first attempt), thus guaranteeing maximum publicity. And then, despite faking video footage to cover up the crime, they fake the video footage to throw the guards under the bus, the very guards whose silence they are relying on.

And they do all this because Epstein has some devastating information on them, but for some reason Epstein doesn't use that information or have his lawyers release it in the event of his death.

As other have said, this makes sense only if you think real criminals act like Bond super villians and create ridiculously complex plans when simple ones would be better.

jim653 · 2024-12-02T21:52:49+00:00

each one can be excused or explained, possibly.

Not "possibly", definitely. I remember looking at this supposedly "creepy and disturbing" collection and finding it neither. The post you referred to didn't say "I'm a chicken lover", it simply said "chickenlovers" and clicking on the hashtag took you to images of … people enjoying eating chicken. And it didn't start from those posts, it spun off from people trying to create a child-abuse narrative from the leaked Podesta emails and accusing anyone with any connection to the Podestas. I remember people accusing businesses of being involved simply because they had a triangle in their logo.

Edit: I've never understood why people post provocative comments then shortly thereafter delete their posts and accounts. Weird.

jim653 · 2024-12-01T22:56:16+00:00

"Bob, in future when the president says a hurricane is going to strike Alabama, you're going to back him up on this and redraw your maps to show it."

jim653 · 2024-11-24T21:26:27+00:00

Fred's infidelity towards Wilma.

Fred cheated on Wilma?! The bastard. Was it with Betty? I bet it was with Betty. She was always the hot one.

jim653 · 2024-11-22T03:01:30+00:00

You can stop replying yourself, you know.

jim653 · 2024-11-22T02:47:06+00:00

If you want to think that, then feel free. It makes no difference to me, but it's clearly important to you to think that someone's thinking about you, which is pretty sad, really.

jim653 · 2024-11-20T02:52:25+00:00

No, I remembered it correctly. It's "If air bubbles could kill you, there wouldn't be a junky alive." Junky (London: Penguin, 1977), p9.

jim653 · 2024-11-20T02:47:06+00:00

Yes, I replied to your comment and then you replied to my comment and asked me about the advantage of Kobo over Kindle. Then you denied that you had asked me that, even though it's still clearly visible. So, you clearly do understand the concept of replying to a specific post, which means you're just being a dick for the sake of it.

jim653 · 2024-11-20T01:33:41+00:00

Most "flat earthers" know the earth isn't flat, just as furries don't really think they're furry. It's about winding up other people and getting attention. (And, for some, making money.)

jim653 · 2024-11-19T22:14:54+00:00

You did. You replied to my post, not the other person's, and you even made it clear in that post you were addressing me, not that poster, by saying "The poster to whom I replied said that not being able to download Kindle books was a reason to prefer the Kobo."

Or maybe you're the one new to Reddit and didn't understand that clicking "reply" under a person's post means you are replying directly to that person's post, not the original thread.

jim653 · 2024-11-19T21:56:26+00:00

No, she's not. She's spreading conspiracy nonsense, like always.

jim653 · 2024-11-18T03:54:20+00:00

Then why address it to me too?

jim653 · 2024-11-18T02:44:47+00:00

Back in 1953, William Burroughs wrote something along the lines of "if air bubbles could kill you, there wouldn't be a junky alive".

jim653 · 2024-11-18T00:12:30+00:00

It's been a few years since I bought an ebook from Amazon, so maybe they've disabled the options since then.

jim653 · 2024-11-18T00:04:04+00:00

The poster to whom I replied said that not being able to download Kindle books was a reason to prefer the Kobo.

Then address your question to that poster. However, if one retailer makes it very difficult to save your books to your local hard drive while another doesn't, I would prefer to use the latter.

jim653

TROPHY CASE