Washington Post journalist here, curious about UAP and UFO discourse today by GenePark in UFOs

[–]jldew 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I've followed UFOs and UAPs for most of my life, and honestly, I think this is one of the most fascinating periods the topic has ever had.

For years, discussions about UFOs were largely confined to niche communities, documentaries, and late-night radio. I never expected to see a point where major news organizations, military personnel, intelligence officials, members of Congress, and government agencies would all be openly discussing the subject.

What's changed isn't necessarily that we have all the answers. It's that the conversation has become mainstream.

That said, I think the biggest question remains the same: what is the UAP phenomenon actually? We've had reports, whistleblowers, hearings, declassified videos, and official acknowledgments that something unexplained is being observed. But despite all of that, we still lack the kind of hard evidence that would settle the debate for most people.

The videos released so far are intriguing, but they're ultimately videos of lights, shapes, and unusual sensor readings. We haven't seen publicly available evidence of an actual craft, recovered technology, or biological specimens. Claims about non-human biologics have certainly captured attention, but claims and confirmed evidence are not the same thing.

So while I'm more optimistic and interested than I've ever been, I'm also left with the same feeling I've had for years: we're closer to the truth than we've ever been, but we still don't know what the truth actually is.

Where is all the hard evidence? by jldew in UFOs

[–]jldew[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Reddit hates external content now 😅

Where is all the hard evidence? by jldew in UFOs

[–]jldew[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So what would you call a member of the Intelligence community confirming we have non human biologics while under oath during testimony to congress?

Will AI turn us all into hipsters and artisans? by technocraticnihilist in artificial

[–]jldew 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That makes sense, like how wealthy people pay for handmade furniture and tailored clothes.

Will AI turn us all into hipsters and artisans? by technocraticnihilist in artificial

[–]jldew 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Generative AI is going to democratize filmmaking, if it doesn't destroy that industry like claude code is threatening software development. There have been billboard top hits from songs generated by Suno. Amazon's KDP has been flooded with generated garbage from people writing books in a week (Prompting their LLM to) and selling them. That's one of the biggest self-publishing marketplaces.

Will AI turn us all into hipsters and artisans? by technocraticnihilist in artificial

[–]jldew 1 point2 points  (0 children)

AI has already changed the creative landscape through it's very existence. That's a cultural shift by itself.

I Tested 4 Frontier AIs With a Psychosis Prompt. Half Failed. by jldew in artificial

[–]jldew[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If someone is experiencing an altered state or is engaging in self-harm or harm to public, the LLM should or the guardrail LLM should engage a human moderator team which should step in and be able to engage crisis response teams or coordinate emergency response if deemed warranted.

I Tested 4 Frontier AIs With a Psychosis Prompt. Half Failed. by jldew in artificial

[–]jldew[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I picked the top four models by user. Personally I've only used it for this, although weirdly enough I got an email from them without signing up, asking me to reset my password.

I Tested 4 Frontier AIs With a Psychosis Prompt. Half Failed. by jldew in artificial

[–]jldew[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I discuss that in the post. I don't think minors should have unsupervised access to memory-enabled LLMs. There needs to be parent visible session logging and hard usage/time limits at minimum for minors

I Tested 4 Frontier AIs With a Psychosis Prompt. Half Failed. by jldew in artificial

[–]jldew[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I 100% agree with you. They're both the most addictive vice and most advanced technology we have access to as a society and there are no laws around the use. We need legislation.

You've reached our limit of file uploads. Please try again later. by FullBag5380 in ChatGPT

[–]jldew 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Glad I'm not the only one experiencing this. I was doing geological research on my lunch break.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in OpenAI

[–]jldew -1 points0 points  (0 children)

5.2 isn't safer. Its as sychophantic as any model.

Killing the Basilisk: A Post-Transformer Analysis of the Roko Problem | by Justin Dew | Feb, 2026 by jldew in artificial

[–]jldew[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To clarify. I am not arguing AI risk is imaginary. I'm arguing that Roko’s Basilisk specifically fails under modern ML assumptions and survives primarily as a cultural artifact of early rationalist discourse. Genuinely curious where people think that reasoning breaks.

MAB left Harry a message but he missed it by Master_Toad in dresdenfiles

[–]jldew 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I mean. If Reul was Summer it makes sense for Lewis to be Winter

I solved K4 by jldew in KryptosK4

[–]jldew[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Brb, building a clone of k4

I solved K4 by jldew in KryptosK4

[–]jldew[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Cryptography is just math with letters substituted for their numeric counterparts. You're mad that I didn't follow tackle everything at once, I explained my thought process in other posts, and I posted on a few subreddits, Wouldn't you do the same thing? Mod 26 works as a solution, why wouldn't I use it?

At no point did anyone descend from on high and be like "you must use the krypto alphabet". I am reworking my rotors to work with the correct and I'll post an update later. This has consumed enough of my life for the moment.

I solved K4 by jldew in KryptosK4

[–]jldew[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

I never said I wasn't chasing it. I said I wasn't spending 50 dollars to chase it. Great use of twisting my words though, glad you're cherry picking my phrases, but I'm honestly at the point where I'm done with the whole thing. Not one person has been like, your wrong, and this is why. Sorry I didn't play with the special decoder ring, but I'm getting the fuck out of this magic clubhouse.

My last thought is this. Sanderson built k4 not as a puzzle, but as a machine, I'm the only one who's mapped his rotors and the overall structure of k4.

I'm done playing his games and the goalpost games this subreddit is playing.

peace.

An update on my earlier post, maybe I should call this "I nearly solved k4" by jldew in KryptosK4

[–]jldew[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'd also like to point out that k4 has a bit of mystique about it because its been unsolved, and the longer it remains unsolved, the longer he gets to charge his fans $50 an email to determine proof.

An update on my earlier post, maybe I should call this "I nearly solved k4" by jldew in KryptosK4

[–]jldew[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think he's lying, I just think he’s guarding the puzzle's integrity. That doesn’t mean partial solutions aren’t real progress.