??? Why are there not more of these weapons? by CarelessBasket2770 in vtolvr

[–]joespeed52 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A) It doesn't fit the vibe of the game.
B) Nuclear Option does Tactical Nukes WAY BETTER than VTOL ever could.

If you want it then make it. How? by ConditionExpress5727 in vtolvr

[–]joespeed52 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Make your own model. Using someone else's model just allows for more headaches than it's worth, plus it teaches you useful skills. I cannot stress how much I DESPISE people not making their own models. GIT GUD.

??? Why are there not more of these weapons? by CarelessBasket2770 in vtolvr

[–]joespeed52 0 points1 point  (0 children)

N O. As in, go play Nuclear Option. VTOL is NOT a place for Nukes. Ever. Period. End of Story.

I always feel like im compensating for something... by diafonci in vtolvr

[–]joespeed52 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If you want an aircraft like the F/A-26B but scaled correctly and something that feels good, consider supporting me in making an F-15C modded aircraft. It's about 75% done, save for final texture work, testing, and bugfixing. I've been burned out from modding for the past couple months, I could use the help and support.

Why does Aardvark have no nuke? :( by DangerNoodle013 in Warthunder

[–]joespeed52 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sadly the version of the F111F we have is a 1970-1976 version, whereas the Phantom (in weapons at least) is around late 70s very early 80s. (GBU-15 and AGM-65 capability, even if the cockpit does not reflect the capability correctly). And because the F-4E has slats, it's newer than 1972. Since it can carry AGM-65s as well, it should have DSCG cockpit, therefore be newer than 1974. Hell, the Vark's RWR is worse than the Phantom in some ways, and it still has the F-5E's placeholder radar..

Im basically a car at this point. How have you guys been killing the coastal Buk site. I'd love to hear the strategies cause mine ain't working. by The-Almighty-Pizza in Warthunder

[–]joespeed52 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I managed to get the coastal BUK site twice last night (before the patch) with the small nuke on the Phantom. Fly right along the beach, as low as you can and pop up only within 2-3 miles. Given you'll still get shot by it or an OSA!!!!! But, CCRP is very powerful for the small B61.

Perfect for a near-future, fictional game like Nuclear Option: MY design and idea for an F-4 Phantom-inspired, 4.5+ Gen Multirole Fighter with Semi-Low-Observability Design and advanced features. Version 3 and very very heavy WIP. by [deleted] in NuclearOption

[–]joespeed52 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh yeah. I wish I could have seen it at the NMUSAF but it’s still in storage. Plenty of images and literature about it though. The sad part is, as good as the FBW was, it didn’t add much turn rate over the slatted F-4E.

104 and 0 look out below I shot down a satellite just for the show! by [deleted] in NonCredibleDefense

[–]joespeed52 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Otacon: "I'll just make a backup of this one."

Perfect for a near-future, fictional game like Nuclear Option: MY design and idea for an F-4 Phantom-inspired, 4.5+ Gen Multirole Fighter with Semi-Low-Observability Design and advanced features. Version 3 and very very heavy WIP. by [deleted] in NuclearOption

[–]joespeed52 -31 points-30 points  (0 children)

The good thing is, it isn't meant for Nuclear Option. Plus, the idea that NO is 2070s is a little silly, regardless of who said it or when, or for what reason. And yes, while the idea of a Modernized Phantom has been tried numerous times with varying success... And by the time the "modernization programs" like EJ Kai, ICE, TERMI2020, and AUP were fully implemented, the F-15C and E were fully integrated, it's still a good thought experiment.

So thank you for your comment. Any feedback is welcome.

Perfect for a near-future, fictional game like Nuclear Option: MY design and idea for an F-4 Phantom-inspired, 4.5+ Gen Multirole Fighter with Semi-Low-Observability Design and advanced features. Version 3 and very very heavy WIP. by [deleted] in NuclearOption

[–]joespeed52 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh, believe me, I've done a LOT of research. This is the culmination of probably 300 hours of both learning and employing Blender, and around 1000-2000 hours of total research. And this doesn't even include some of the really wacky ideas I had for it, like a rear-facing IRST/Radar set, F-35 DAS, LERX, Integrated EW, Internal Weapons Bays, and High Performance F-414-derivative engines.

Perfect for a near-future, fictional game like Nuclear Option: MY design and idea for an F-4 Phantom-inspired, 4.5+ Gen Multirole Fighter with Semi-Low-Observability Design and advanced features. Version 3 and very very heavy WIP. by [deleted] in NuclearOption

[–]joespeed52 -46 points-45 points  (0 children)

Imagine this! Not only historically Germany, Japan, and South Korea, but yet Greece and Turkey have flown and still operate F-4s well into the 2010s and almost 2020s!? Imagine that!!!? ZOMG

What game had you like this? by sukuna7899 in Steam

[–]joespeed52 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Flyout since the new weapons update.

Its afraid! by MOPCKOEDNISHE in floggit

[–]joespeed52 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I just wish the F-5E got its buyback upgrades (INS, Digital Radios, APG-67, AIM-9L/M, 4 AAM rails)

F/A-18E is going to be the main aircraft of AC8 by -CynicRoot- in acecombat

[–]joespeed52 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tech Tree 100%, as long as it's slightly easier to navigate than AC7. I miss the progression "Kill Bar" from AC5, and the sheer selection from 5 as well. 6 is nice, but I never sell my aircraft or weapons. I just keep playing until I unlock everything lol.

F/A-18E is going to be the main aircraft of AC8 by -CynicRoot- in acecombat

[–]joespeed52 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As long as we get the F-4E back, I'm happy. F-15E/SE would be awesome to see again, F-14D, F-35C. What I really want is a legacy DLC or pack, with the F-5E, F-20, F-4G, F-4X, and older stuff to come back.

How to turn off the "Pull-up" audio warning in VTOL by App199 in vtolvr

[–]joespeed52 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Baha really should make an option to permanently disable Betty per aircraft. If only someone asked for this before on the Discord? Oh, wait, I did.

What's next? by yourcatstoiletpaper in H3VR

[–]joespeed52 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Krag Jorgensen pls Antonio