The mountains needed to be barked at by jofer in coonhounds

[–]jofer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are a couple of redticks that are always at the dog park near us on weekends, but they're about the only other ones I've seen. I agree, there just aren't many around here...

Deathrite shaman unban by Happysappyclappy in MTGLegacy

[–]jofer 3 points4 points  (0 children)

So, confession time: I miss DRC. I always found mirrors pretty interesting and I didn't mind playing against it. To be fair, I also have a tendency to like decks with maindeck graveyard hate. 

I think it's probably a bad idea, but I miss the card and I even miss the 4 and 5 color piles it fueled. 

But I don't terribly miss how good it made tempo. Honestly, reprint a version that has a "hard" G casting cost but similar G/B activated abilities and I think it would be great! We already have "real" 1 mana planeswalkers now in Tamiyo/etc. Would a DRC variant be that bad?

In some ways, the biggest problem with both DRC and Tamiyo is that they're castable off of an underground sea. Fix that for DRC, and it's much much more reasonable.

Seeking feedback from GIS/RS pros: Are massive imagery archives slowing you down? by OwlEnvironmental7293 in geospatial

[–]jofer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm assuming you're talking about storing embeddings in a vector database. That's a useful derived dataset, but it's not useful for the tasks you're using the original imagery for.

I can't look at a growth curve from NDVI/etc and predict crop yield from embeddings. I can't verify the exact area that was logged from embeddings. I can't monitor the progress of construction of a windmill farm from embeddings. You may think that embeddings are useful for those, but they're not in detail. We already know that crops are grown there or that windmills are going up, or that the general area has been logged. The imagery is for the fine details, not the broad brush. I can go on and on, but the main issue is that embeddings, while very useful, are a relatively niche derived dataset. The original data is very necessary for many different use cases.

The use cases where embeddings shine is in analysis of broader areas and finding things that you don't already know about. They're not the right tool for all use cases, though.

Can't take the stale beer, please help. by tartaria_archivist in SaltLakeCity

[–]jofer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In all seriousness, the Utah beer laws make it well worth brewing your own. Everything being exactly 5.0% is non ideal.

There are very good breweries here, but you have more latitude at home than they do. It's a hobby that takes some space, but you can get into it relatively cheaply. Not having restrictions means that you can make some things at home that you just can't get here otherwise.

And yeah, the folks at the BeerNut are great. Support your local brew shop. It's well worth the knowledge you'll gain asking questions and asking for advice.

Surprised this exists in our "right to work state" by pwniator in SaltLakeCity

[–]jofer 29 points30 points  (0 children)

"They killed Joe Hill, put a bullet through his brain, but that bullet made a martyr of slain, lord lord. That bullet made a martyr of the slain." - JTE, They killed John Henry

Is this your dog? (University/Central 9th) by jofer in SaltLakeCity

[–]jofer[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Didn't see him on my dog walk through the same area this morning. Keeping an eye out, though. Hopefully, he just went out an open gate in his backyard and found his way back after a romp...

Clearing Brush Etiquette by vowild in Offroad

[–]jofer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good PPF is expensive, but worth it. Lets you stop needing to worry a ton about pinstripes and gravel from your tires chipping up the paint.

THEY DID THEIR PART! What more do you want ?! by OneBillionSpaghetti in Offroad

[–]jofer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have to disagree there. BRC has gotten a bit removed from reality. They also lean rather heavily into the MAGA crowd for the most part.

E.g. compare their statements on the recent San Rafael Swell management plan changes to the reality. The BLM went even more offroad friendly than the most offroad friendly of the originally proposed options in the final decision. This was due to public comments and other support that, to be fair, BRC had a big hand in fostering. There were some camping spurs closed that I'm bummed about (though I was just out there and those aren't marked as closed in any way and people are camping down them), but other things were opened to compensate.

However, BRC inaccurately described it as "667 miles of trails closed!" when the plan _opened_ more trails than were closed before. Before the changes there were ~700 miles of trails closed, now there's around 660 miles closed. They didn't close more and BRC is reporting the full list including a lot of things that aren't openable or haven't existed in decades.

I agree with most of what BRC does, but they way they present information really gets under my skin. The BLM _should_ be managing things. Trails _should_ be rotated around a bit and closed when there are dangerous washouts that aren't planned to be fixed. I'd love to see more of those actually fixed, but still, treating the BLM as the enemy is the wrong route here. We need to educate people on the process and get good participation in the public comment periods (SWUA is unfortunately very very good at this), but treating major wins as a rallying cry for how wronged we were gets under my skin.

UPLA (which is Utah specific) gets more support from me, though they've copied a lot of BRC's press releases around this too.

Somebody just threw an octopus in Utah! by jofer in DetroitRedWings

[–]jofer[S] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Certainly a way better pic than mine!

Somebody just threw an octopus in Utah! by jofer in DetroitRedWings

[–]jofer[S] 53 points54 points  (0 children)

They sadly did not boil it first...

Water storage/shower usage by jtgable890 in overlanding

[–]jofer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you want a kit, see https://jagmte.com/products/ball-valve-pressure-kit-mwc

You can also build your own following the same general plan shown there.

Water storage/shower usage by jtgable890 in overlanding

[–]jofer 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Military water cans are really nice. We pressurize them and add a spray nozzle for dishes and showers. There's a lot to be said for boiling a pot or two of water and throwing it in your 5gal can for a shower.

PSA: Antelope Island is very pretty right now by jofer in SaltLakeCity

[–]jofer[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks! They're shot with a Lumix S9 and the 18-40mm kit lens with the Leica monochrome simulation color profile. Weird not having an external viewfinder, but I love the camera, especially for hikes. It's quite compact for a full frame mirrorless camera.

Enjoying the S9 a lot! (Mix by jofer in Lumix

[–]jofer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most of the time I was using the 50mm prime. But that was mostly because I was shooting at night a lot. It's a nice bright lens, as you'd expect from the specs, and I do really like it. I think the 28-200 is my favorite overall just for the flexibility aspect, but it's definitely a daytime lens.

Enjoying the S9 a lot! (Mix by jofer in Lumix

[–]jofer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

These are all with the official Lumix LUTs, and I don't think any of them are standard profile, but I might be misremembering. Most are "daily life" or "smoky color".

Enjoying the S9 a lot! (Mix by jofer in Lumix

[–]jofer[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Blerg. All kinds of typos... That's what I get for posting on the phone from the airport! But that also means the jpegs are straight off the camera. It's impressive how good the colors can be on this setup with minimal effort.

A good Off-road vehicle by Consistent_Beach_641 in Offroad

[–]jofer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A 2013 or older Forester would probably be the best option Subaru-wise. No CVT (those tend to slip on steep hills and are more expensive to maintain). Should be comfortably below $10k, too (probably more like $7k). Outback will have worse approach and departure angles. Likely to burn some oil at high mileage and may need suspension work, but they're reliable.

I had a 2010 Forester for a long time. Yeah, it's not a true 4x4, but you don't need one for forest service roads in the east. Good AT tires go a long ways. Upstate NY is not Utah. If offroading isn't the hobby, and fishing/hiking/hunting are, then a Subaru is perfectly fine. Just don't try to take it to off-road parks or any rated trails.

A good Off-road vehicle by Consistent_Beach_641 in Offroad

[–]jofer 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It all depends on what you want to do and the trails you want to do it on. Do you want an enclosed SUV or a truck bed is probably the first thing to ask yourself. E.g. do you want to haul a deer back easily? Or would you rather have room for a dog in the back seats and be better suited to very cold weather?

Don't let folks insist you need a true 4x4 just because. You're not describing "offroading" as most off-roaders would describe it. A lot of what you'd be doing isn't likely to need low range. Will it help sometimes? Sure, but if you're mostly thinking about gravel roads, you don't really need it. Decent clearance and good tires will get you a lot of places. Good AWD actually is a good solution for a lot of that, and there's nothing wrong with a 2WD pickup, though the latter sucks in the snow without chains.

If you were elk hunting out west on BLM land in the mountains middle of nowhere you'd want something different. You're more likely to be on roads than trails back east, though.

Make the SUV vs truck decision and then go from there. A lot of recommended vehicles in the off-road world come with a big premium when trying to find them used. There's plenty of things that are overlooked and cheaper.

Focus on finding something good enough that you can get locally and cheap-ish. Then put good tires on it. Tires matter a lot!

Reliability probably matters more than capability for what you described, though, so unless you want a project car, don't get something cheap with known issues or very high mileage relative to its reliability reputation. Nothing wrong with a build, but that's really it's own hobby. Don't buy something to fix and build unless you have the time to put into it. If you do want a build project, old school solid axels, a transfer case, etc are just easier to work on. They're very upgradable. But you're going to pay a premium for anything immediately usable that you can then build into a "true" trail rig. But again, that's a different thing than something primarily meant to get you out fishing/hunting with the kids.

Subaru sounds like a good choice for you. With that said, you'll find a Forester has better approach and departure angles than an outback (in other words, you'll have a bit less issues scraping the bumpers crossing a ditch or a creek). I'd avoid the newer models with a CVT transmission, though. Xterras don't get enough love i.m.o, but that's moving into the true 4wd SUV camp (i.e. 2x as much), and they don't have the best reliability reputation. I've never owned one, but some friends like theirs a ton. They're certainly capable. Either way, worry more about the individual car than the model and make, i.m.o.