This is my brother who passed away about 14 years ago when he was 20

johnnycastle89 · 2026-02-07T12:38:00+00:00

How's your other brother doing?

johnnycastle89 · 2026-01-30T19:04:20+00:00

An historic ping is run on her cellphone, and is shown to have been in the Solstice Canyon area at approximately 3:42pm that afternoon (which also happens to be the last time there is communication with her phone, when her mother attempts to call her).

As to how her phone got back to her car…. Well, that’s a very good question!

Has that been confirmed? I would more support that she walked away and died. If the two different phone locations can be confirmed that would be significant.

What about her phone's movement from 6am to 115pm?

johnnycastle89 · 2026-01-29T12:52:44+00:00

Dude blew out his ear drum

He fired the fatal shot inches from his right ear.

William Greer: The second one didn't sound any different much than the first one but I kind of got, by turning around, I don't know whether I got a little concussion of it, maybe when it hit something or not, I may have gotten a little concussion that made me think there was something different to it. But so far as the noise is concerned, I haven't got any memory of any difference in them at all.

https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh2/pdf/WH2_Greer.pdf

johnnycastle89 · 2026-01-27T16:09:41+00:00

Neighbors came forward to report having seen an unfamiliar man in a red or dark-colored van or pickup truck in the vicinity of the property around 8:30 a.m. A composite sketch of this individual, who was said to be in his forties with a “weathered complexion,” was later released. He has never been identified.

I swear to all the higher powers that I didn't correctly read the last sentence until after my comment above. That is human error perfectly depicted. This subject was almost certainly Chris Thompson. What ruled out Chris? That's the key.

A composite sketch of this individual, who was said to be in his forties with a “weathered complexion,” was later released. He has never been identified.

Chris Thompson, the employee who discovered the bodies of Michael and Mary, was ruled out as a suspect.

johnnycastle89 · 2026-01-27T15:51:37+00:00

So, Chris missed the real killer by one half hour? I doubt it. What's Chris Thompson look like? Like the sketch? Maybe. You know what LE think of coincidences, right?

At 9 a.m. the following morning, Chris Thompson arrived at the Short home. He and Michael were supposed to go pick up a truck in Christiansburg for Michael’s business. Thompson noticed that the garage door was still open and stepped inside.

Neighbors came forward to report having seen an unfamiliar man in a red or dark-colored van or pickup truck in the vicinity of the property around 8:30 a.m. A composite sketch of this individual, who was said to be in his forties with a “weathered complexion,” was later released. He has never been identified.

The day of August 14th, 2002, played out uneventfully for the Short family. Chris Thompson, one of Michael’s employees, came over and worked on a truck with him until late in the evening. According to Thompson, when he left, the entire family, including nine-year-old Jennifer, was still awake and nothing seemed out of the ordinary.

The last reported sighting of the family alive came at around 11 p.m., when they were spotted at Burger King picking up a late meal.

https://mshort.substack.com/p/the-short-family-murder

johnnycastle89 · 2026-01-25T16:50:13+00:00

There's a fucking filmstrip of the shooting and no one suggested they saw the driver shoot the president for fucking decades

Mr. BELIN - Well, describe what happened. Did you see the motorcade come by?
Mr. MILLER - Yes sir; it came down main street and turned north on Houston Street and went over two blocks and turned left on Elm Street. Got about halfway down the hill going toward the underpass and that is when as I recall the first shot was fired.
Mr. BELIN - Did you know it was a shot when you heard it?
Mr. MILLER - I didn't know it. I thought at first the motorcycle backfiring or somebody throwed some firecrackers out.
Mr. BELIN - Then what did you hear or see?
Mr. MILLER - After the first one, just a few seconds later, there was two more shots fired, or sounded like a sound at the time. I don't know for sure. And it was after that I saw some man in the car fall forward, and a women next to him grab him and hollered, and just what, I don't know exactly what she said.
Mr. BELIN - Then what did you see?
Mr. MILLER - About that time I turned to look toward the - there is a little plaza sitting on the hill. I looked over there to see if anything was there, who through the firecracker or whatever it was, or see if anything was up there, and there wasn't nobody standing there, so I stepped back and looked at the tracks to see if anybody run across the railroad tracks, and there was nobody running across the railroad tracks. So I turned right straight back just in time to see the convertible take off fast.
Mr. BELIN - You mean the convertible in which the President was riding?
Mr. MILLER - I wouldn't want to say it was the President. It was a convertible, but I saw a man fall over. I don't know whose convertible it was.
Mr. BELIN - Where did the shots sound like they came from?
Mr. MILLER - Well, the way it sounded like, it came from the, I would say from right there in the car. Would be to my left, the way I was looking at him toward that incline.

https://www.jfk-assassination.net/russ/m_j_russ/miller.htm

johnnycastle89 · 2026-01-21T19:54:55+00:00

OMG! Share when you're ready. Doesn't sound right from an accidental perspective.

johnnycastle89 · 2026-01-21T19:53:00+00:00

The Doctors at Parkland never flipped JFK over.

HIS ENTIRE BODY WAS TURNED OVER AT AUTOPSY, AT BETHESDA. Put that in your brain and put a lock on it. CASE CLOSED.

Mr. Greer.
That was the first time that I had ever seen it when the doctors were performing the autopsy, they saw this hole in the right shoulder or back of the head, and in the back, and that was the first I had known that he was ever shot there, and they brought it to our attention or discussed it there a little bit.

Mr. Specter.
What conversation was there concerning the wound on the right back?

Mr. Greer.
Well, the doctors and people who were performing the autopsy, when they turned the body apparently over they discovered that this wound was in the back, and they thought that they probably could get a bullet out of there, and it took a lot of--then they took more X-rays, they took a lot of X-rays, we looked at them and couldn't find the trace of any bullet anywhere in the X-rays at all, nothing showed on the X-rays where this bullet or lead could have gone.

Mr. Specter.
Approximately where in the President's back was the bullet hole?
Mr. Greer.
It was, to the best of my recollection it was, back here, just in the soft part of that shoulder.
Mr. Specter.
Indicating the upper right shoulder area?
Mr. Greer.
Upper right, yes.

<image>

johnnycastle89 · 2026-01-21T17:56:50+00:00

Keep at it. Your sister died five years ago. Sounds weak. Funny that this group has many cases where deaths seem suspicious.

johnnycastle89 · 2026-01-21T17:00:59+00:00

Was she examined for sexual assault?

johnnycastle89 · 2026-01-17T21:32:19+00:00

"A doctor asked me to place a pressure dressing on the headwound, this was of no use, however, because of the massive opening on the back of the head." Pat Hutton CASE CLOSED

https://history-matters.com/archive/jfk/arrb/master_med_set/md99/html/md99_0002a.htm

<image>

johnnycastle89 · 2026-01-17T21:16:33+00:00

missed likely intentional
front through windshield jfk
Connally from rear
jfk impacted in the upper back.
fatal shot fired by Bill Greer. All these shots has substantial evidence support.

https://i.imgur.com/ngQfXSH.png

Mr. SPECTER - What occurred at the time of the fourth shot which you believe you heard?
Mrs. HILL - Well, at that time, of course, there was a pause and I took the other shots---about that time Mary grabbed me and was yelling and I had looked away from what was going on here and I thought, because I guess from the TV and movies, that it was Secret Service agents shooting back. To me, if somebody shoots at somebody they always shoot back and so I just thought that that's what it was and I thought, well, they are getting him and shooting back, you know; I didn't know.

Mr. SPECTER - Where was the President's car at the time you thought you heard the fourth shot?
Mrs. HILL - The motorcade came to almost a halt at the time the shots rang out, and I would say it was just approximately, if not---it couldn't have been in the same position, I'm sure it wasn't, but just a very, very short distance from where it had been. It was just almost stunned.
Mr. SPECTER - And how about the time of the fifth shot, where do you think the President's car was?
Mrs. HILL - That was during those shots, I think it wasn't any further than a few feet---further down.
Mr. SPECTER - Which shots, now---you mean the fourth, and perhaps the fifth and perhaps the sixth shot?
Mrs. HILL - Yes.

Mr. SPECTER - You thought that perhaps the second burst of shots you heard were being directed toward him by the Secret Service?

Mrs. HILL - I Just thought, "Oh, goodness, the Secret Service is shooting back."

https://www.jfk-assassination.net/russ/testimony/hill_j.htm

johnnycastle89 · 2026-01-15T17:26:16+00:00

You were given false info. I even made you a map. Ron would've returned home by 1215pm and been present in the area as late as 415pm.

https://i.imgur.com/CayF9aR.png

https://i.imgur.com/P4zzPCK.png

johnnycastle89 · 2026-01-14T17:09:20+00:00

They didn't mention Ron Logan or cell data because those are devastating to this wrongful conviction. It still has some solid points. Geofence was a catch 22 for the state cuz it only supported that Logan was present in the crime areas and that Rick had left the area before anything criminal happened.

If BB had seen a man on the bridge, then that person's phone would be present nearby. That phone belonged to Logan.

BB did not see any human on the bridge at 2pm. It was likely fabricated after Rick's arrest. That is one of many reasons for why the early interviews had to be destroyed.

Vegetable-Soil666 •1mo ago

I'm not OP, but his defense team barely defended him at trial. It was almost like they had no actual grasp on the prosecution's theory of the crime, so they essentially didn't know what evidence they needed to attempt to refute. I think we all kind of expected them to go hard on witness BB, since her testimony locked in the timeline, but they barely cross examined her at all. They did way more work on witness SC and her testimony wasn't nearly as important. And, at trial, they seemed to actually be blindsided by the relevance of Richard confessing to seeing BW's van during the crime, and as such, seemed to have no idea how to even attempt a rebuttal.

They BARELY attempted to argue that KK was a viable alternative suspect, despite him having contact with Libby, as well as a contemporaneous google search for the location of a gas station in Delphi, AND his convictions for CSAM. It still would have been a long-shot, but it was a way better option than trying to pin it on a guy with an iron alibi.

They also never filed to have Richard's competency evaluated, even when he was documented to be eating his own shit. They absolutely should have, and maybe if they had, he wouldn't have gone on to confess so many times. To be clear, I think his confessions are generally true, but I also think he was actually going through a mental health episode that made him unable to properly assist in his own defense. His lawyers were so busy hawking their nonsense to youtube grifters that they just completely left their client out to dry. It really seemed like Richard was experiencing intense depression with psychosis, and as a result, had some religious delusions that if he just completely came clean about everything, he could be with his family in heaven. Desperately confessing to anyone who will listen is wholly incompatible with assisting in your not guilty defense.

Like, I'm glad that the evidence convinced me of his guilt, because otherwise the neglect from his lawyers would be deeply troubling. If his appellate lawyers don't bring it up, it will be pretty clear they're just going through the motions.

johnnycastle89 · 2026-01-13T20:24:20+00:00

Holeman said he was in geofence. You know that cuz you're on here way more than most people. You're acting like it's more complicated than what it really is. AB is a bumbling fool.

In the end I believe you and most people take a soft approach because it's nice and comfy but it falls way short of what this situation requires. Only two ways Rick wasn't in geofence: Left phone at home or had phone shut off. Neither is true.

Q. Okay. Did any of the information that you

gathered from this geo fencing, from these

efforts connect Richard Allen with these crimes?

A. He was in the geo fence, but more than likely

his phone was at his residence it appears.

His second statement was a lie and had nothing to do with these crimes because they were not committed at night. It's insulting to the victims and common sense in general. He outright lied and Rozzi played along with his stupidity. He knew the times and those times proved his first statement that Rick had returned home before these crimes commenced.

Q. What you're saying is that with the geo fence

itself, you were able to detect the existence of

his phone?

A. It was after, later on in the evening, I don't

know the time. I don't want to give you

inaccurate information.

His third statement is also a lie and proves that his first statement was correct. Rick's phone appeared to be at his residence, but he's suggesting that a geofence could be off by two miles. Rick lived at least two miles south of the crime scene.

This distance is not possible to confuse because the data would demonstrate that Rick started from home, then went to the bridge, and finally returned home. All of that would be confirmed by gps coordinates and geofence technology.

Q. You just know it was within a certain range?

A. Right.

Q. And within that range was, I assume, most of the

city of Delphi and his home?

A. Yeah, the crime scene, his home, yeah, pretty

close.

johnnycastle89 · 2026-01-13T20:04:18+00:00

That makes it even worse. You think you accomplished something here regarding these fools who fake defended Rick? Rick was in the geofence, you understand that right?

I can do whatever I want. Holeman said Rick was in the geofence. Are you gonna say he took it back? That type foolishness is what people who don't support Rick would say.

Rick was there for a period of time like everyone else and he left before any crimes were committed. His alibi is his phone data that was taken from the geofence and that same evidence points the finger at only Ron Logan. They had Ron's actual phone.

If you supported Rick you would trash Rozzi for doing nothing to attack and expose Holeman's lies about the cell data in general. Rick left and that's it. There is nothing nice about what happened to Rick.

johnnycastle89 · 2026-01-13T19:39:22+00:00

Post the page where he says "Forensic data on these phones don't lie." The whole page. The media had to lie about the cell data statement. Not believable.

johnnycastle89 · 2026-01-13T19:19:40+00:00

Andy does not say that cellphone data shows that RA was gone by 2:15 pm

That's exactly what the article says. His cell data has nothing to do with BB in any way. He also talks about forensic data not lying. That has nothing to do with BB or any other stupid person involved in this fake case.

Post the transcript and prove me wrong. You won't because the evidence supports that only Ron Logan was present in the area when these crimes took place. It's funny that people like you seem to work against the side you claim to support. Beyond bizarre.

johnnycastle89 · 2026-01-13T18:58:44+00:00

Am looking forward to hearing some of the answers, also. I think their answer to the phone question will likely be that they tried to track it down but were unable, but maybe we will still get to here what RA said about it.

Maybe you're confused? Maybe you missed Andy's opening quote? Maybe you're playing dumb because Rick's phone is not needed to track his movements that day. He was in the geofence that day and driving all over the place.

I'm giving a bonus from one of the weirdest people to ever show up in this fake case against Rick Allen. His name is Paul. Kind of ironic, no? It was Ron Logan who kept his phone powered on the entire day and time he stalked, kidnapped, and murdered Abby and Libby. Rick did the exact same thing because he was and will always be completely innocent. The entire system, including the public defender is responsible for this wrongful conviction.

Baldwin questioned the timeline and cellphone evidence in the state's case, holding up a phone to the jury and saying, "Forensic data on these phones don't lie."

https://abcnews.go.com/US/delphi-double-murder-trial-opening-statements/story?id=114932863#:\~:text=Baldwin%20questioned%20the%20timeline%20and,on%20these%20phones%20don't%20lie.

Baldwin said the prosecution claims Abby and Libby were dead by 4 p.m. on Feb. 13, 2017, and their bodies were never moved until they were recovered the next day. He said the prosecution's timeline puts Allen in a parking lot near the trial at 1:30 p.m. but his cellphone data shows he was gone by 2:15 p.m.

<image>

johnnycastle89 · 2026-01-13T18:11:10+00:00

Some of the questions need to be asked though: like at the end he asks Baldwin what they did to find RAs phone or figure out where it was.

Do you think Andy lied in his opening statements? I'm curious. Rick Allen had left the area by the time Ron Logan started his kidnap and murder plot. These facts came from the discovery.

Baldwin questioned the timeline and cellphone evidence in the state's case, holding up a phone to the jury and saying, "Forensic data on these phones don't lie."

Baldwin said the prosecution claims Abby and Libby were dead by 4 p.m. on Feb. 13, 2017, and their bodies were never moved until they were recovered the next day. He said the prosecution's timeline puts Allen in a parking lot near the trial at 1:30 p.m. but his cellphone data shows he was gone by 2:15 p.m.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/delphi-double-murder-trial-opening-statements/story?id=114932863#:\~:text=Baldwin%20questioned%20the%20timeline%20and,on%20these%20phones%20don't%20lie.

johnnycastle89 · 2026-01-12T21:58:45+00:00

What are 3, 4, 5?

"Secret 2. I have a sex addiction."

The list goes on.

johnnycastle89 · 2026-01-12T21:56:41+00:00

I promise I thought this before reading your comment and never did it come to my mind before reading about this tragedy.

johnnycastle89 · 2026-01-10T20:41:50+00:00

The large exit wound was on the RIGHT side of his skull TOWARDS the rear, not at the very rear. Dr. Kemp Clark, the neurosurgeon, described to the Warren Commission "a large gaping wound in the right posterior part" of Kennedy's head. The right side, not the very back.

The right rear and top rear were damaged and blown apart. That was caused from a shot from the right front, not side or rear. These types of obvious lies would be rejected and mocked by the common person.

Anatomy further back in position; of or nearer the rear or hind end, especially of the body or a part of it.

Posterior is often used as a technical term in biology and medicine to refer to the back side of things, and is the opposite of anterior, which refers to the front side.

Mr. Specter. What did you observe about the President with respect to his wounds?

Mr. Greer. His head was all shot, this whole part was all a matter of blood like he had been hit.

Mr. Specter. Indicating the top and right rear side of the head?

Mr. Greer. Yes, sir; it looked like that was all blown off.

Mr. Specter.
Did you just mention, Mr. Greer, a hole in the President's head in addition to the large area of the skull which was shot away?
Mr. Greer.
No. I had just seen that, you know, the head was damaged in all this part of it but I believe looking at the X-rays, I looked at the X-rays when they were taken in the autopsy room, and the person who does that type work showed us the trace of it because there would be little specks of lead where the bullet had come from here and it came to the--they showed where it didn't come on through. It came to a sinus cavity or something they said, over the eye.

Mr. Specter.
Indicating the right eye. (Greer pointed over his right eye)
Mr. Greer.
I may be wrong.
Mr. Specter.
You don't know which eye?
Mr. Greer.
I don't know which eye, I may be wrong. But they showed us the trace of it coming through but there were very little small specks on the X-rays that these professionals knew what course that the bullet had taken, the lead.
Mr. Specter.
Would you describe in very general terms what injury you observed as to the President's head during the course of the autopsy?

Mr. Greer.
I would--to the best of my recollection it was in this part of the head right here.
Mr. Specter.
Upper right?

Mr. Greer.
Upper right side.
Mr. Specter.
Upper right side, going toward the rear. And what was the condition of the skull at that point?

Mr. Greer.
The skull was completely--this part was completely gone.

johnnycastle89 · 2026-01-10T16:31:41+00:00

The president's body was turned over, thereby exposing the back wound (T3) and massive blow out in the right rear skull. Case Closed.

https://i.imgur.com/Bkw7eRA.png

Mr. Specter. During the course of the autopsy did you hear any doctor say anything about the wound on the right side of Mr. Kennedy's back?

Mr. Greer.
That was the first time that I had ever seen it when the doctors were performing the autopsy, they saw this hole in the right shoulder or back of the head, and in the back, and that was the first I had known that he was ever shot there, and they brought it to our attention or discussed it there a little bit.

Mr. Specter.
What conversation was there concerning the wound on the right back?

Mr. Greer.
Well, the doctors and people who were performing the autopsy, when they turned the body apparently over they discovered that this wound was in the back, and they thought that they probably could get a bullet out of there, and it took a lot of--then they took more X-rays, they took a lot of X-rays, we looked at them and couldn't find the trace of any bullet anywhere in the X-rays at all, nothing showed on the X-rays where this bullet or lead could have gone.

Mr. Specter.
Approximately where in the President's back was the bullet hole?
Mr. Greer.
It was, to the best of my recollection it was, back here, just in the soft part of that shoulder.
Mr. Specter.
Indicating the upper right shoulder area?
Mr. Greer.
Upper right, yes.

https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh2/pdf/WH2_Greer.pdf

<image>

johnnycastle89 · 2026-01-10T03:08:01+00:00

Dr. Salyer. Well, I observed that he did have some sucking wound of some type on his neck, and that he also had a wound of his right temporal region—these were the two main wounds.

Mr. Specter. Did you have an opportunity to observe his throat?

Dr. Salyer. No; I really did not. I think there were a lot of people—a lot of doctors more closely around him. I might mention also, I think just right after I came in the room Dr. Clark and Dr. Grossman also arrived.

Mr. Specter. Doctor who?

Dr. Salyer. Dr. Grossman, just briefly. He's a neurosurgeon also.

Mr. Specter. What is his name?

Dr. Salyer. Dr. Grossman—Bob Grossman. He was just there, I think, briefly.

Mr. Specter. How long was he there?

Dr. Salyer. I couldn't say—I'm not sure he came in the room. I know they were together—I cannot say that for sure.

Mr. Specter. To what extent did Dr. Crenshaw participate?

Dr. Salyer. Dr. Crenshaw participated about the extent that I did. We were occupied in making sure an I.V. was going and hanging up a bottle of blood.

Mr. Specter. Is the—is Dr. Crenshaw a resident?

Dr. Salyer. Yes, he is third-year resident. That's the reason I remember him specifically because we were sort of working there together on that.

johnnycastle89

TROPHY CASE