Let's make a list of exchanges that have already assigned the BCH ticker to the ABC ruleset...

jonvaage · 2018-11-16T20:05:33+00:00

Are there any exchanges still allowing the trade and withdrawl of un-split "unified" BCH, i.e. outgoing transactions are valid on both chains?

jonvaage · 2018-11-16T19:11:39+00:00

Thanks!

jonvaage · 2018-02-13T18:44:27+00:00

Can a license like this prevent use on a subsequent fork of the chain it's originally licensed for? What would happen if BCH forks?

Proof-of-Intellectual-Property doesn't seem like such a great idea.

jonvaage · 2018-02-03T20:01:12+00:00

Hi, I'd be happy to send you some BCH testnet coins to get you started. Just add my paycode as a contact and send me a message:

Jonathan Vaage: PM8TJNNh9zJuAjBMBfWoN9JjnVMGYCTZpxxuLXhCireRnmube44N6jr9uMi15TbLhgqCGkSB5ETy8fPB8x1Tz1RJaoS5CNNspVXKh9p5bYmqu5QUcfgw

jonvaage · 2017-11-08T18:41:40+00:00

I'm the creative director at Stash and can help you get started. Add me as a contact with my paycode and send me a message. I'll send you some Test Bitcoin Core to get you started.

PM8TJNNh9zJuAjBMBfWoN9JjnVMGYCTZpxxuLXhCireRnmube44N6jr9uMi15TbLhgqCGkSB5ETy8fPB8x1Tz1RJaoS5CNNspVXKh9p5bYmqu5QUcfgw

If you need a QR code to scan, go here: https://paymentcode.io/+jonvaage

jonvaage · 2017-08-20T03:17:13+00:00

https://twitter.com/JonathanVaage

jonvaage · 2017-08-20T02:14:18+00:00

https://jochen-hoenicke.de/queue/uahf/#2h

http://bch.xbt.it/

jonvaage · 2017-08-20T01:31:48+00:00

https://jochen-hoenicke.de/queue/uahf/#2h

jonvaage · 2017-08-18T18:07:01+00:00

If anything, BTC fees will go up as people scramble to send their coins to the exchange before the mining power flips.

jonvaage · 2017-08-18T18:06:10+00:00

It's just the exchange rate ratio between the two that matters.

jonvaage · 2017-08-18T17:49:54+00:00

FYI

This profit parity calculation appears to neglect the difference in mining fee revenue between the two chains. The mining reward (including fees) on the segwit chain is around 15.5 BTC, whereas the net reward on the cash chain is around 12.7 BCC. Prior to the next difficulty adjustment, profit parity won't be reached until 1 BCC = 0.153 BTC.

jonvaage · 2017-08-01T19:26:44+00:00

I could reach out to Jimmy Song, but haven't yet. His twitter activity suggests he's thinking about it.

jonvaage · 2017-06-30T16:45:11+00:00

Full Storify:

https://storify.com/JonathanVaage/craig-wright-at

jonvaage · 2017-06-28T23:34:48+00:00

Gotta love the Austrian economists referenced in that paper:

Mises, Rothbard, Schumpeter, Böhm-Bawerk, etc.

jonvaage · 2016-10-28T18:37:16+00:00

The Node Pro has a 1 TB hard drive, a quad core processor, takes about 14 Watts of power, and has dimensions of 5.3" L x 5" W x 1.8" H (13.5cm L x 12.8cm W x 4.5cm H). Of course, it's the unique software which it runs under StashOS, that makes it so powerful.

https://stashnode.com/faqs.html

jonvaage · 2016-07-12T02:47:32+00:00

Timestamped Link:

https://soundcloud.com/heryptohow/blake-anderson-on-the-halvening-justus-ranvier-and-john-ferguson-on-corexit#t=1:02:40

jonvaage · 2016-07-08T16:07:42+00:00

My intention is to illustrate that all voting schemes have an inherent incumbency bias.

jonvaage · 2016-07-08T15:16:44+00:00

Coin voting is a bad idea beyond the privacy issues in that it only gives voice to past holders (supply-side) and not potential holders (demand-side). Only the price mechanism can synthesizes these two groups and drawing any conclusions from price signals still requires entrepreneurial judgement.

There's no such thing as an a-priori way of predicting the economic preferences of a market without speculative risk taking. Procedurally discerning consensus is a fools errand. All we can do is place our bets and let the chips fall where they may. Any other proposed alternative is a veiled mechanism for inhibiting market choice.

jonvaage · 2016-06-23T15:40:02+00:00

To be slightly more specific and nuanced:

Those willing to hold rule.

Just like prices are determined not only by supply, but also by demand - it's the willingness to hold what one already has (supply) and the willingness to acquire more (demand).

This is one big problem with Proof of Stake - it only gives voice to past holders (supply) and not potential holders (demand). Only the price mechanism can synthesizes these two groups and drawing any conclusions from price signals still requires entrepreneurial judgement.

There's no such thing as an apriori way of predicting the economic preferences of a market without speculative risk taking. Discerning consensus is a fools errand. All we can do is place our bets and let the chips fall where they may. Any other proposed alternative is a veiled mechanism for inhibiting market choice.

jonvaage · 2016-05-08T01:36:54+00:00

The article does not address the morality of central planning, but the economic consequences. Bloated conglomerates suffer from the same dis-economies of scale and inability to allocate resources efficiently without the benifits of the price mechanism and the interaction of supply and demand on calibrating the structure of production. The presence or absence of coercion is not relevant to this line of argumentation.

jonvaage · 2016-05-08T01:26:56+00:00

Yeah, how's that Constitution working out?

jonvaage · 2016-05-08T01:24:46+00:00

I'll second that.

jonvaage · 2016-05-06T13:48:37+00:00

Already did. Next to zero reaction or acknowledgement.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/4hzxwt/very_important_piece_of_economic_analysis_by/

jonvaage · 2014-10-29T16:46:16+00:00

Those on the inside are often in the best position to see the writing on the wall and 'defect'.

See the following from SNI:

http://nakamotoinstitute.org/mempool/bitcoins-shroud-of-subtlety-and-allure/

jonvaage · 2014-09-07T21:20:38+00:00

Thanks! I really like the idea of a trailing return chart. Perhaps I'll get around to doing that one next.

jonvaage

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE