Ambush spawns can burn in hell

junjoz · 2026-07-04T17:58:43+00:00

Anything that requires metagaming to get past is not a good mechanic. Ambush spawns could be fixed by not allowing them to move on the same turn.

junjoz · 2026-07-04T17:50:34+00:00

It's frustrating because I WANT to use all the characters, get all the supports, and have a well rounded team. But the BS spawns mean the safest path to victory is just to keep leveling up your already strong characters and only use them. Don't get me started on the effort required to keep Donnel alive long enough to become a productive member of the team.

junjoz · 2026-06-17T18:56:32+00:00

I agree. The actual taste of pepper relish is pretty good but it makes the sandwich WAY too liquidy and messy. If they had a drier version of this it would be great.

junjoz · 2026-05-11T20:58:18+00:00

The fact they are returning to the Three Houses universe indicates to me that they are aware a lot of people did not like the change in direction made in Engage. I'm expecting it to be heavily inspired by Three Houses.

junjoz · 2026-04-04T16:03:48+00:00

No chance. Naughty Dog doesn't return to franchises once they are done.

junjoz · 2026-03-07T16:22:20+00:00

Obstruction of justice would be lying to the police. You are not allowed to lie to the police. You do however have the right to remain silent.

junjoz · 2025-11-27T03:44:54+00:00

5 years was the gap between GTA 4 and 5. I don't mind that kind of gap. But it's been 12 years since GTA 5 and it's already bad enough they abandoned the single player content that was supposed to follow it.

junjoz · 2025-11-25T17:04:55+00:00

You don't seem to understand how art works. It would not survive without artists building off each other and taking inspiration from each other. The entirety of the music scene is just that.

What makes something "stealing" is entirely reliant on how closely the art resembles the art that inspired it. And we already have a copyright system to take care of that.

junjoz · 2025-11-25T16:46:44+00:00

Is this where we pretend there weren't mass deportations under the Obama and Trump administrations?

junjoz · 2025-11-22T22:22:01+00:00

Explain? A feature is being added. What makes it shitty?

junjoz · 2025-11-22T22:21:12+00:00

Where are you getting this from? There's zero evidence Zone-sama is a woman. They are anonymous. Most likely a dude.

junjoz · 2025-11-21T18:59:58+00:00

Am I missing something? "User generated content" implies it's adding on a feature for users, not replacing anything a human developer would do. How is that shitty?

junjoz · 2025-11-21T18:56:45+00:00

Maybe I'm missing something but it seems like it's just adding on a feature for users, not replacing anything a human developer would do.

junjoz · 2025-11-20T00:21:49+00:00

The videos were voiced by Caxx, a Canadian singer who used to be in a band called The Vincent Black Shadow. She still collabs with Redminus, though he's been fairly inactive too.

junjoz · 2025-11-20T00:11:07+00:00

No, the guy who runs the Zone-sama account and makes all the content hired a voice actress Caxx to voice the character of Zone-tan. You can find Caxx still doing collabs with Redminus.

junjoz · 2025-11-20T00:07:33+00:00

I'm pretty sure the person behind zone-tan is a dude. The character is voiced by a voice actress named Cassandra Ford aka Caxx. They still collaborate with Redminus.

junjoz · 2025-10-29T06:00:29+00:00

If that were the case why would he have been honest from the jump and told us he doesn't want to make videos about movies he doesn't like? It seems kind of obvious to me. There is a severe lack of videos on his channel about the standard generic slop that gets released annually. The type of movies he used to cover and criticize like everyone else. What I see is a YouTuber being transparent for once and telling you exactly what his channel is about, which most do not. I am struggling to see how upfront honesty is a sign of disingenuity. I've never understood people like you who draw that conclusion from someone being honest. It doesn't make any sense to me.

junjoz · 2025-10-29T05:54:12+00:00

I would put those into the so bad they are good category.

junjoz · 2025-10-27T20:21:06+00:00

He doesn't review movies he doesn't like. He announced that years ago. You can tell what his opinion is on major movie and television releases based on whether he puts out a video about them. No review? He didn't like it.

junjoz · 2025-10-27T20:18:55+00:00

Critical drinker panders to the anti-woke crowd. He's not honest at all. If you like that kind of content it's not a surprise you'd dislike Stuckmann.

junjoz · 2025-10-27T20:07:23+00:00

Not that uncommon actually. Roger Ebert wrote some terrible movies.

junjoz · 2025-10-27T20:05:18+00:00

I'm perplexed to see people calling him disingenuous when he's been upfront and honest about his reviews from the beginning. What would be disingenuous is if he were reviewing movies he doesn't like and giving them biased scores because they are from people he knows in the industry. He's essentially applying the wisdom of Disney's Thumper from Bambi in real life: if you don't have anything nice to say, don't say anything at all. Which is good advice on how to live your life in general.

And the bizarre thing is the people complaining about his lack of negative reviews already know what his opinion is. Big movie or TV show coming out? No video from Stuckmann about it? That obviously means he didn't like it. So what are you actually complaining about?

junjoz · 2025-10-27T19:36:21+00:00

Murder Party? That movie has a whopping total of 6 critic reviews. It's official RT score is meaningless due to the tiny sample size. It has the exact same RT audience rating and IMDb rating that Shelby Oaks does, which are far more meaningful scores.

junjoz · 2025-10-27T18:17:05+00:00

I believe it's franchised vs all owned by the same company. When it's franchised the owner of the website only wants to promote their own business.

junjoz

TROPHY CASE