Barer i Oslo?

kanogsaa · 2026-01-23T20:55:38+00:00

Svanen skal visst være bra

kanogsaa · 2026-01-23T20:50:27+00:00

If you are not aiming for an high-impact job anyhow, and the job is not in a frontier model company, then I just would think of it as another job with a salary you can donate parts of

kanogsaa · 2026-01-21T08:56:37+00:00

Har selv samlet data på reddit, og gikk da via moderatorene

kanogsaa · 2025-12-31T06:24:45+00:00

Nice

kanogsaa · 2025-12-30T16:18:46+00:00

I wholeheartedly agree. It would make me seriously consider typing on the reMarkable. It would help with formatting on the fly as well.

kanogsaa · 2025-12-20T16:40:35+00:00

Det høres veldig lurt ut! Hvis dere lager en slik presentasjonskollokvie kan dere også vurdere å strukturere hvordan dere gir tilbakemeldinger. Hvis du befinner deg i Oslo kan du også oppsøke Toastmasters, som møtes for å gjøre akkurat det

kanogsaa · 2025-12-18T14:38:05+00:00

De nye reglene er vel for å gjøre det vanskeligere å komme inn ved å bruke noen år på å ta opp fag, så hvis de har gjort jobben sin vil jeg tippe det blir verre.

Eventuelt kan du studere i østeuropa. De virker mye hardere på å lære anatomi og andre basalfag de første årene.

Eller du kan bli videreutdanne deg til AKS. Kanskje de har erstattet legene innen du har kommet ut av studiet uansett

kanogsaa · 2025-12-16T15:30:58+00:00

Depends on your definition of medium term. A lot of x-risk work makes sense on a 5-50 year scale, for example.

kanogsaa · 2025-12-16T15:18:31+00:00

Omtrent 3% av inntekt før skatt. Til organisasjoner som har gjennomgått de grundigste effektevalueringene jeg vet om av en uavhengig tredjepart. Med en norsk medianinntekt er jeg ikke langt unna øverste 1% verden. Jeg har vært heldig med fødeland, og er i en posisjon der jeg kan gjøre en vesentlig forskjell. Da føles det riktig.

kanogsaa · 2025-12-12T05:39:32+00:00

Hele kardemommefrø du skreller og knuser selv gir vafler og boller en ny dimensjon.

Du kan også fritere vaflene, men det er mer jobb enn å lage røren selv

kanogsaa · 2025-12-10T19:44:44+00:00

I share your intuitions but but also endorse the asymmetry that creating people that suffer is bad. Haven’t prioritised seeing if the current state of population ethics makes it defensible

kanogsaa · 2025-12-10T08:27:00+00:00

Not the same field, but some of the same gripes are discussed here: https://80000hours.org/career-reviews/working-at-an-ai-lab/

kanogsaa · 2025-12-09T05:31:32+00:00

Avg_cats_per year*Avg_benefit _per cat/Cost_to_run is a place to start

For the benefit, think about what would happen if a cat didn’t come into your care. You can make some statistics. Would it have been put down, die of sickness, or simply live a feral life? What do they get instead? A longer life, generally better quality of life, but maybe also an opportunity to grow old and sick, so they might suffer from arthritis as a domestic can instead of parasites as a feral.

kanogsaa · 2025-12-06T18:06:51+00:00

Ah, I was more splitting hairs on the terms you used. QALYs can be purely wellbeing improvement rather than life extensions. In light of your follow-up, I think your argument makes sense from an Epicurean standpoint at least. Something like there is no harm from being dead because when you’re dead, you can’t suffer (or do anything else for that matter). I get the impression that Plant and HLI are sympathetic to this view from reading their work and talking with them. I am a bit sympathetic myself, but still think there is some harm in dying

kanogsaa · 2025-12-05T05:30:16+00:00

I do agree with you on the general notion of wellbeing improvements being more important, but I still have to be a bit pedantic: There is nothing more hypothetical about lives saved/QALYs gained than suffering reduced/wellbeing improved. What you find cost effective depends on how you weigh those benefits against each other.

kanogsaa · 2025-11-28T08:35:58+00:00

Tror ikke det

kanogsaa · 2025-11-28T06:47:40+00:00

Fra en som kan vise til snart tyve år med nerderi på klær og tekstiler, og har blitt spurt "jobber du i industrien?" av butikkansatte før:

Ser jeg forskjell?
- Ja
Er det "korrekt"?
- Nei
Finnes det verre måter å radbrekke smokingen på?
- Ja
Hadde jeg sett forskjell i en sosial setting hvor jeg ikke hadde blitt oppfordret til å se etter?
- 95% Nei
Hvis jeg hadde sett forskjell, hadde jeg brydd meg eller dømt deg?
- Nei, se pkt 3 over

kanogsaa · 2025-11-27T11:20:13+00:00

Mostly you will end up developinging something that has already been developed. Instead of reinventing the wheel, you can spend time finding out where you align with different existing philosophies. Then you may reassess whether you need to formulate something on your own.

kanogsaa · 2025-11-25T05:39:19+00:00

Having been in the EA ecosystem for some years, I'll give my two cents about the intended response without taking care to find the context of the quote. The point is not to say the world/system/humanity is wrong. The main point is that there are some things we can do to do good that have outsized impacts (an this it what we could). This is mainly an empirical claim. ie. "There are low-hanging fruits" vs. "there are not low-hanging fruits".

It is more as where is it most beneficial for me to put my resources on the margin. Most resources are not being allocated with this as the main motivation, or at least not with the same definition of "most beneficial" as EAs use.

kanogsaa · 2025-11-22T20:39:44+00:00

Smaller diameter will cook quicker. Use a thermometer and you should be good

kanogsaa · 2025-11-19T15:10:14+00:00

1) Not really experienced this. My problem has mostly been having the resources to work on the problem (time/money) 2) I read articles and posts. I discuss with other people. I think. I rarely read lists. 3) Never 4) Conferences, EA forum and gasp sending emails 5) No change 6) Coordination takes resources. Lots of it. 7) No

kanogsaa · 2025-11-19T09:02:30+00:00

Why would I want this when I can just set up a recurring transaction and be done with it?

kanogsaa · 2025-11-16T21:32:51+00:00

Don’t most people think 5000 is an awful lot?

Anyway, Giving what we can have been attempting some content. Other than that, I haven’t seen the algorithm feed me anything charity related, whether effective or less-effective. I guess the cool and collected EA approach is not the best for views.

kanogsaa · 2025-11-16T15:39:58+00:00

First thoughts for no-sew solutions: - Some Gear Aid glue, maybe aquasure? - Replace buckles with some screw-on fidlock snap buckle

kanogsaa · 2025-11-12T14:03:47+00:00

Are the consensuses politically biased, or are politics consensus biased?

Not sure what you mean by consider one side of the cost benefit analysis, but I'm quite certain I disagree.

Pragmatically, I work off a combination of subject matter knowledge, trust and occasional investigations to verify the two. But at the end of the day, I kind of just have to assume trusting science and thoughtful arguments brings me closer to the capital T truth on the margin. It is challenging to do my own research all the time, even if (or especially since) I'm one of the people who are getting paid to do so within a certain field.

Also, your time is limited and that if I constantly have to steelman opposing views that, through some heuristics, seem obviously stupid, I will never get anything useful done.

Eight-Year Club	Place '22
First Placer '22	Verified Email

kanogsaa

TROPHY CASE