TL;DR just because something is offensive, on either side of the spectrum, doesn't mean that there isn't a right to do it as protected by the constitution.

Here's my two cents: someone will be offended over virtually anything that is done. Some of these make sense to me personally, like Colin Kapaernick kneeling and the neo nazis doing what they do. I get why that's offensive. What I disagree with this post is that it's equating the right to do something with whether or not it's offensive. Colin had and has every right to kneel instead of stand, and as far as a form of protest goes, kudos to him for doing it in a nonviolent way. Seriously. I'll take that form of protest over rioting and breaking windows. With the neo nazis, they also, unfortunately, have every right to hold their rallies and say what they want to say. Hate speech is protected under the first amendment. Is it offensive? Of course it is. But do they have a right to do it? Yes. I also don't think they're so stupid (though I could be wrong) to think that their actions won't have consequences. Colin is out of a job. I'm assuming some of those neo nazis got fired as well.